- 2 -



     3. Allowing SG to choose student members of the Code Committee
        reflects a sincere desire and respect for student input, something
        to which we believe the University is committed.

     This Board should reconsider the revision. Within the board code
committee the measure failed to pass merely by a vote. The vote was 2-1.
This proposal is significant enough to require a close scrutiny by the full
board.

     If useful and valid student input into the code revision process is the
desire of this board, it should move now to adopt this measure.



Action: Approved



Disapproved



Date:                       1975.



Other



I      I  



1 1 975.