wormy. Opinions differ as to all the late July and August. To counter-
CGUSGS i11\'0l\’€‘€l. but Iliff W1`ll€1` feels act scale, leaf curl and possible mite {L
{hilt the i¤diff¤r¤¤t €0\'€i`ilE£€ 0D· troubles, every grower should do an H
tgiggdc ;"lth Clusls “'€ls tv blilmc m extra good job this year of applying i W
s — zses. , . ( S .1 ._ — ,b,S   ,
Harvest counts were made ifi il tll$e.(l`Q1lf,LElle§°1,$t—et»tithZtiLila";}.  V  
¤¤¤¤b¤i· of W¤St¤r¤ Kvmuvky or- mo Beteiehhx. Detailed iheh—ht-tthhe 2
°`ll€ll"l$· In Omg Plldllcllll °l`Clllll`Cl on mixing and application are given
over 80 percent of the crop contained in Kcmuckv Extmlsmn L(.;,i·|M`t)_ \\
· curculio and it was difficult to find Pcqch Tljcc Burn BV thc Um_ A B
Q S°““°l p°"°ll= lll *‘ll°lll°l` °l`“l“‘l"l this IQQLIO of tht- Fruit Ntitts 'l))l"ll`;  — ll
in the same district only 2 percent . [.1*]* _ b_ bl _ I _ I 1_t_‘1‘l4l “,·' lt
of the crop was wormy. Curculio It “lUl°i_°_?) I l°_ Ulm _‘l li. ll ‘lll_llll ` ft
infested peaches in most orchards ll° l°*—ll   Dst**·£}**1*_*‘.* _l’_l_l)a_‘llll
ranged from l0 to 20 percent. In ll°°_Dl)l°l sllllllllj _ll,l” lllslfl, fllls b
general, the best control was ob- `l glsfll   _ll°l°`” ilml _l;°`ll`°ill” U
tained in young orchards or where °llll°l*._°l L"} l.l"ll‘__ " _llllll‘l lll"'l_i ` I.
a very thorough program of spray- lll_°lll lb srllllil llll?lllf'_ll$l_1°.l_l`;l_ _ll ‘1 { I
ing or dusting had been followed. hlllllgl lll,llll‘i   °_l}l°l?ll.i ls lu; lll  ‘ [
Some growers had considerable ll°lF`l*·_ ('lll“l`l*.ll “’_l*'l skill) ll,‘,j‘l _ c
trouble with arsenical injury to lll“`ll .ll°`°*_llll*_ lflll $5lll_ *ll_ _ lll‘l"` Y
foliage but prompt use of nitrogen l‘ll°` lflll lll. °“lll} ”lllllll*· l,l.°:;l;lll_t`lll *  
fertilizers corrected some of the bi “§'l‘=“_°lll}°li.{`,ll1‘FlF`{‘f` fll‘ llllllflh . \
“‘°¤**‘°- E2·tJ3?-filllifhh-H."vI-W Zt»Jtl"Elf'i-Illia ` t
Oriental Fruit Moth. Injury from QOEL A ` ` ` (
oriental moth was very spotty and. ` __AA ,___,_m_n,_ \
in general. lighter than in 1945. . , , , . , . , _. . ;
TWO D,.C_hm.,.CSt Spmys Of DDT 194(1 kI;N'1U(I€\r SIATL PAIR I
again gave excellent control in the FRUIT I·.XI*llBlT Q
EiS<>¤ ¤r¤h¤¤‘d at L¤<¤>¢tt¤r iilivrv The i¤S Represented ‘
more numerous than last year, The apple exhibits were divided
ranging from T to 28 percent of the about equally from Jefferson and .
crop in ten orchards. The type of Trimble counties in central Ken-
cat-facing found on peaches in west- tucky and from Graves and Mc-
ern Kentucky orchards is very dif- Cracken counties in western Ken- ·
ferent from that at Lexington or in tueky. For the first time in years
eastern Kentucky, and is no doubt no fruit was exhibited from Hender- _
caused by different insects in each son county. Peach exhibits came ‘
section. Several western Kentucky largely from Trimble and Mci
growers who used early DDT treat- Cracken counties. The colorfu
ments felt they reduced the amount grape displays were divided between
ofsinjiiiry considerably. 1 H Trimble and Jefferson counties.
ca e. San Jose scae is sti a .
problem in Kentucky peach or- Results `
chards, as evidenced by the amount In the feature apple exhibit of
of scale-marked fruit found at twenty trays consisting of three or t
harvest and the number of young more varieties, first place went to
scales seen crawling over the tree in J. W. Fegenbush, Bucchel, Ken-
2