xt75tb0xqs4d https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt75tb0xqs4d/data/mets.xml   Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station. 1964 journals kaes_bulletins_185 English Lexington, Ky. : The Station, 1885- Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin n.185. text Bulletin n.185. 1964 2014 true xt75tb0xqs4d section xt75tb0xqs4d Regulotory Bulletin 185
1   Commercial Fertilizers
{ in Kentucky, 1964
Including a Report on Oiiicial Fertilizer
Samples Analyzed
` i ~ ]uly-December, 1964
*{ OF
g E
 
Qzsssiv
University of Kentucky
Agricultural Experiment Station
Lexington

 
 FEED AND FERTILIZER DEPARTMENT
_ KENTUCKY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
U Bruce Poundstone, Chairman
Robert Mathews, Assistant Administrator & Chief Inspector
V W. J. Huffman, Registration Inspector
J. M. Fernandez, Auditor-Inspector
FIELD INSPECTORS
' urice M. Davis Wilson M. Routt
oel J. Howard Neville Hulette Eugene Vanderpool
LABORATORY SMFF
 Iva Midkiff John A. Shrader Lelah Gault
ohn T. Adair John H. Ellis Norma Holbrook
‘  ul R. Caudill Dewey H. Newman, Jr. Robert N. Price
CONTENTS
Page _
 planation of Tables ........................... 4
ggested Ratios and Minimum Grades of Fertilizer for Kentucky 1965 .... 5
 mpanies Represented by Samples Reported in This Bulletin ........ 6
 BLE l — Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers ..... 8
·¤  2 — Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Liquid Fertilizers . . . 30
 BLE 3 - Analyses of Straight Materials ................. 32
·  LE 4 — Analyses of Inspection Samples of Soft Phosphate with
Colloidal Clay . .... . ................... 37
 BLE 5 - Results of Analyses of Boron in Fertilizers Reported in
Table l ......................... 38
_ This report compiled and prepared by Bruce Poundstone and W. J. Huffman
Analytical data by the Laboratory Staff

 4 REGULATORY BULLETIN 185
This bulletin contains results of analyses of 682 official samples of com-
mercial fertilizers made during the period July 1 through December 31, 1964.
Separate tables are provided for the results of analyses of mixed dry fer-
tilizers, mixed liquid fertilizers, straight materials, and boron. ·
EXPLANATION OF TABLES -
The information given in the following tables should be useful in deter-
mining how nearly a manufacturer is meeting the chemical guarantee printed on `
the bag or tag for the fertilizer represented by the samples listed. This may
be done by comparing the guarantee shown at the beginning of each listing of
samples with the actual analysis in the columns at the right in terms of ni-
trogen, available phosphoric acid and potash.
An additional means of comparing guarantees with the analyses of samples 7
is in the percent of relative value found, shown in the extreme right-hand
column. The following examples illustrate how this relative value is calcu-
lated:
A 5-10-15 sulfate fertilizer is guaranteed to contain 5 units of Nitrogen,
10 units of Available Phosphoric Acid and 15 units of Potash. Factors for
computing the relative value of these plant foods are: 3 for Nitrogen, 2 for _
Available Phosphoric Acid and 1 for Potash. Thus the combined guaranteed valu
of the product represented is calculated:
5.0 Units of Nitrogen x 3 = 15.0
10.0 Units of Available Phosphoric Acid x 2 = 20.0
15.0 Units of Potash x 1 = 15.0
Total computed guaranteed value 50.0
The same procedure is followed for "found values." Assuming a sample
of 5-10-15 was found to contain 5.1 units of Nitrogen, 10.2 units of Available
Phosphoric Acid and 15.1 units of Potash, the relative found value is computed
5.1 Units of Nitrogen x 3 = 15.3
10.2 Units of Available Phosphoric Acid x 2 = 20.4
15.1 Units of Potash x l = 15.1
Total computed value 50.8
50.8 (computed found value of sample) divided by 50.0 (computed guaran-
teed value) times 100 (to arrive at percentage) gives 101.6 as the percent of
the relative value found. _
ln some samples a deficiency in one nutrient is accompanied by an over-
run in another nutrient. This may be evidence of improper mixing or weighing
by the manufacturer or, in the case of blends, segregation during transfer
from mixer to bagger, or to spreader truck, due to variation in particle size _
of materials. Extreme variations of this kind cannot be attributed to separa-
tion of materials (segregation) after the product is bagged though this may
be a minor factor. Excess of one nutrient cannot compensate for deficiency -
of another nutrient. The purchaser is entitled to receive the full guarantee
of all nutrients as expressed by the manufacturer's guaranteed analysis.
The results of analyses of all inspection samples are given in tables 1,
2, 3, and 4. If an analysis shows a deficiency of more than the tolerance,
the amount claimed for Nitrogen, Phosphoric Acid or Potash, or if the percent
of the relative value is 97 or less, the result is indicated by an asterisk.

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, FALL SEASON 1964 5
SUGGESTED RATIOS AND MINIMUM GRADES OF FERTILIZER
FOR KENTUCKY 1965
‘ The following ratios along with the minimum grade of fertilizer in
each ratio is suggested for use in Kentucky during the Calendar year 1965.
‘ Ratio Minimum Grade
0-1-1 0-20-20
0-l-2 0-10-20*
0-1-3 0-10-30*
1-1-1 10-10-10
1-1-3 6- 6-18
1-2-2 5-10-10
A 1-2-3 5-10-15
1-3-2 4-12- 8
1-4-1 4-16- 4**
1-4-4 5-20-20*
2-1-1 12- 6- 6
4 *When used on clover for seed production or on alfalfa, grades with-
in these ratios should have boron added.
**This is a special fertilizer for tobacco plant beds. Only one
grade in the ratio is suggested. The grade 4-12-8 may also be
used on plant beds.
Grades higher than the minimum grades in all ratios except the 1-4-1
ratio are considered to be on the suggested list.
In addition to this list of mixed fertilizers, straight materials
are suggested. These should be used when only one of the major plant
nutrients is required or if there is no mixed fertilizer that will approx-
imately meet the nutrient requirements. However, when the nutrient re-
quirements can be met by using a mixed fertilizer, the recommendations
should be kept within one of the suggested ratios. The decision as to
whether mixed fertilizers or straight materials are used is often a mat-
4 ter of economics and should be left with the farmer.

 s REGULATORY BULLETIN 185
COMPANIES REPRESENTED BY SAMPLES REPORTED IN THIS BULLETDI
American Agricultural Chemical C0. Darling & Company _
lO0 Church Street 420l S. Ashland Avenue
New York, New York Chicago, Illinois
American Cyanamid Company E-town Fertilizer Company V
Agricultural Division Cecilia
P. O. Box 400 Kentucky .
Princeton, New Jersey
Farmers Chemical Association, Inc.
Armour Agricultural Chemical Co. P, O. Box 67
350 Hurt Building Tyner, Tennessee
Atlanta, Georgia
Federal Chemical Company ‘
Bale Fertilizer C0. 646 Starks Building
Horse Cave Louisville, Kentucky
Kentucky
Glasgow Fertilizer Company
Bartlett 6: 0'Bryan Fertilizer Co. Glggggw
108 River Road Kentucky
Owensboro, Kentucky
W. R Grace & Company ‘
Bluegrass Plant Foods, Inc. Davison Chemical Division
Cynthiana 10l N. Charles Street
Kentucky Baltimore, Maryland
Bunton Seed Company W. R. Grace & Company
939 E. Jefferson Street Nitrogen Products Division
Louisville, Kentucky 147 Jefferson Avenue
Memphis, Tennessee
Burley Belt Fertilizer Co.
Route 4 Hutson Chemical Company
Lexington, Kentucky Railroad Avenue
Murray, Kentucky
California Chemical Company
Lucas & Ortho Way International Minerals & Chemical Cor  ,
Richmond, California P. O. Box 15067, Lockland Station
Cincinnati 15, Ohio
Chilean Nitrate Sales Corporation
120 Broadway Kenco Fertilizer Company, Inc.
New York, New York Bowling Green
Kentucky . `
Commonwealth Fertilizer Co., Inc, ·
Morgantown Road Kentucky Fertilizer Works
Russellville, Kentucky Winchester
Kentucky
Cooperative Fertilizer Service, Inc.
Southern States Building
Richmond, Virginia _
(CONTINUED)

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, FALL SEASON 1964 7
Companies Represented by Samples Reported in This Bulletin (Continued)
Kerr-McGee Oil Industries Swift & Company
_ Prescription Fertilizer Service Agricultural Chemical Division
Kerr-McGee Building National Stock Yards, Illinois
:Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
V Tennessee Corporation
Land—O-Nan Warehouse 2521 Glendale-Milford Road
Sturgis Cincinnati, Ohio
· Kentucky
Tennessee Farmers Cooperative
Monsanto Agricultural Center LaVergne
BOO N. Lindbergh Blvd. Tennessee
St. Louis, Missouri
. ' Tri—State Chemical Company
North American Fertilizer Company Henderson
1419 South Preston Street Kentucky
Louisville, Kentucky
Union Fertilizer Company
Prescription Fertilizer Service Morganfield
- Guthrie, Kentucky Kentucky
(See Kerr-McGee Oil Industries)
{ Valley Counties of Kentucky Cooperative
` Price Chemical Company Benton
2600 Millers Lane Kentucky
Louisville, Kentucky
(Sec F, S. Royster Guano Co.) V-C Chemical Company
Division Socony Mobil Oil Co.
F. S. Royster Guano Company 401 East Main Street
Price Chemical Division Richmond, Virginia
Norfolk, Virginia
West Kentucky Liquid
O. M. Scott & Sons Company Hopkinsville, Kentucky
.rysville (See W. R. Grace & Co., Table 2)
Ohio

 8 REGULATORY BU'LLE'1.`IN 185
TABLE I.- Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers,July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient mare than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent ar less ’
indicated by asterisk.
Manufacturer N_ Available Percent of -
Grade '"°9°" Phasphoric Pomsh Relative
Scmple NU”"b€' Acid Value Found .
AVWEFEICAN AGQ1 CHEMICAL CO CINCINNATI (Percent) (Percent) (percenn
Q IE BVI
15O Q-O I3-E B•7 IO7
5i\¢• 4.3 I2•<4 8-6 IO5
5 20 201/I
*545 5.2 19-7 20.3 100 ‘
6 12 12M
'5i•6 5.0 I1-B 13-'P 103
I6 B BM _
IIOB 1E>•O 7•9 5-9 IOI
AMEDICAN AGF?1 CHEMICAL CO LONDON
 
J 12 IBM
2106 3-0 I2•O 12-0 IOO
A 12 BM
1 4-] 11-8 8-3 IDE
6 ¢».;1 12.1 8.0 103
l1Q1 Q•3 I2-I B-5 IO!4
glo; 4.2 11-B B-14 101 »·
5 IO IOM
190 5•O IO-I IO-5 102
5 El) EOM
191 5-O 20•O 20•O IOO -
1* 1*1 1¤~¤ A
192 5.8* 11•E IO•2 IOO
I.`~'E??ICf\N AGDI C*·*E"1lCAL "O NAQHVILLE
  -
1,*3* 3-O B•E 6-3 IOO
1152 J-O B•B 6-1 99
1. 12 iw
11 41..2 11.7 9.% IO?

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, FALL SEASON 1.964 9
TABLE I.- Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
» Analyses deficient more than talerance and relative values at 97 percent or less
indicated by asterisk.
_ Mqnufccmrer _ Available Percent of
Grade N'*"°9°" Phosphoric P°I°$h Relative
7 Sample Number Acid Value Found
AMEQICAN AGRI CHEMICAL ca NAQHVILLE com (Percent) (Percent) (Percent)
5 20 IOM
1156 4.9 18.7* 11.5 98
5 20 20M
14 5.0 19-1* 19.5* 97*
1153 4.9 21-0 18-5* 100
' 1635 8.0 19.0* 19-6 109
, I 6 12 12M
1636 5.7* 11.8 12.5 99
l IO 10 1nM
I5 9.8 10-7 10.2 102
1109 10.0 10-2 10.4 101
IO 20 20M
16 8.8* 18.9* 19.0* 92*
151 9.4* 19.0* 20.9 97*
12 12 12M
1155 11.4* 12.2 12.6 99
 MEQICAN AGIQI CHEMICAL CO QEVVIOUQ
 
5 2O 2OM
1576 5.0 20.2 20.6 101
1626 ¤.7* 1<9.¤* 20.8 98
A AMERICAN AGQ1 CHEM CO \•lASI-IINGTON C H
6 24 IPM
542 5.9 27.2* 14.3 101
12 12 12M
543 12.G 11-8 12.8 101
’AFQi·/IOLJQ AGRI CHEMICAL CO ATLANTA
/ 8 32 16*/I
1640 8.7 32.0 14.8* 101

 10 REGULATORY BULLETIN 185
TABLE I.— Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers,July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient mare than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent ar less
indicated by asterisk.
Manufacturer _ Available Percent of
Grqde Nlhogen Phasphoric P°I°Sh Relative ’
Sample Number Acid Value Found .
Acwiauw nam CHEMICAL ca ¤ri_ANrA com (Percent) (Percent) (Percent)
  ~
12 za 24M
1057 12.5 25.1 23.7 104 ‘
15 00 5M
1056 15.0 40.6 5.2 101
AQMOUQ AGRI CHEMICAL CO CINCINNATI
 
4 12 5M
65 ¢4.¢4 13.9 10.5 117
105 0.0 12.4 Q.7 106
5 20 20M I
112 5.2 15.9* 21.9 100
115 5.2 15.9* 20.0 95
116 5.1 19.6 21.5 102
I2] 5.2 15.!4* 20.1 97*
6 12 12M
66 5.7* 12.5 12.1 101
71 6.0 11.5 12.5 101
AQMOUQ AGQI CHEMICAL CO JEFFEQQONVILLE i
 
0 12 5M
7 Q.3 12.2 5.5 105
10 4.2 12.2 5.2 103
149 i•.O 12.3 9.0 10Q
155 6.1 12.5 '?.2 106 `
172 4.1 12.6 5.7 105
5 P") 2"M '
11 5.0 20.3 19.6 100 I
50 5.1 15.9* 1*3.7 (37*
156 5.0 20.2 21.2 102
1556 5.6 19.6 19.5* 101
1655 5.L• 19.7 19.3* 100
6 12 12**
-5 6.0 11.lHP 14.1 102 I
12 5.6* 12.5 Ib.5 I0!.
I" ia irxu .
51 :*.2* 10.** 1}.6 105
166 3.0* 10.5 10.6 I0")
1555 5.2* 11.4 12.2 'V7

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, FALL SEASON 1.964 11.
TABLE 1.- Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent ar less
indicated by asterisk.
Manufacturer _ Available Percent of
» Grade N'"°g°" Phaspharic P°'°sh Relative
_ $¤m¤¤•= Number Acid Value Found
A•=2M0u¤ AGQ1 CHEMICAL ca NASHVILLE (Percent) (Percenr) (Pe,-een;)
20 20M
» 132 22.4 15.5* 101
164 17.5* 24.0 99
4 12 5M
165 4.3 12.5 5.0 104
'A 532 4.2 11.7 7.5* 99
I 536 :.,4. 12.3 8.0 104
1070 4.6 12.2 5.5 106
A 1059 4.7 12.5 5.3 105
1610 4.6 12.3 5.3 106
1623 4.1 11.5* 9.5 103
1641 4.2 12.6 9.1 107
2117 4.1 12.5 5.6 104
` 2125 4.4 12.2 5.0 104
‘ 5 20 20M
. 133 5.0 20.6 17.5* 95 `
535 5.1 19.9 20.6 101
550 5.0 19.9 21.9 102
1055 5.0 21.0 19.6 102
1616 5.7 20.7 17.1* 101
1621 5.1 20.0 20.0 100
1677 5.0 21.0 19.2* 102
6 12 12M
43 5.7* 12.5 12.4 101
· 145 6.1 12.1 11.6* 100
1071 5.9 12.3 12.0 101
1624 6.4 12.2 12.1 103
164'1 6.0 12.6 11.6* 101 _
1676 6.0 12.5 12.2 101
6 15 12M
1605 7.0 19.9 12.0 110
1617 6.7 19.1 12.3 107
, 1622 5.6* 16.2* 12.2 03*
. 1O 1O 10M
. 134 9.7 9.5 10.2 95
142 9.7 10.2 11.1 101
530 9.4* 9.7 10.2 96*
I 531 9.5 11.6 10.3 105
537 9.6* 11.2 11.0 104
551 10.1 10.3 10.5 117}
1157 9.6* 11.2 9.5 1C2
1606 9.5* 10.3 11.} 1711
1615 9.7 10.0 11.7 l'J1
1625 9.5 10.5 10.0 1**1
1644 10.0 9.9 10.*1 1C‘1
1675 *3.5* 10.2 11.7 101
1675 9.3* 10.7 10.5 10;}

 12 REGULATORY BULLETIN 1.85
TABLE I.- Analyses of Inspection Samples at Mixed Dry Fertilizers,July-December, I964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent or less
indicated by asterisk.
Mqnurqcrurer _ Available Percent of `
Grade N'"°g°" Phasphoric P°1°Sh Relative
5¤mPl€ Number Acid Value Found ·
Anmoun Ace; c»·<12MicAi_ ca NASHVILLE c0~T (Percenr) (Percent) (Percent) l
IO 10 IOM CONTINUED > A
2118 10.1 IO•1 IO•B 102
2124 9.5* 10•3 11•O IOO
2154 9.9 10•A 10•9 102
BALE FEPTILIZEP COMPANY _
 
15 BOM WITH BORON
1145 12.3* 31.8 9Q*
RLUEGUAQS PLANT FOODS INC CVNTHIANA i
 
IO 1O 10M
1599 10.0 9•7 12.3 103
ELUEGPA55 PLANT ?OOD5 INC DANVILLE
 
20 2OM WITH BORON
1062 1B•9* 19•O* 95*
5 20 20M
1136 5•6 21•5 19•3* 105 .
IO IO IOM
1061 10.5 9.4* 10.7 102
1135 10•4 10•3 lO•5 100
¤1JMTON SEED COMPANY
6 I2 6%
1590 5.¤* I1•B 10.2 104
¤1r¤1_Ev FELT FEQTILIZEQ CO
¤ 12 BM
1144 4•¤ 10•6* B•B QB
5 EO 2OM
556 5•O 21•2 1B•5* 101

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN ICENTUCKY, FALL SEASON 1964 13
TABLE 1.- Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent or less
indicated by asterisk.
- Manufacturer N_ Available Percent of
Grade ·*r<>¤¤r· Phospharic P°t°$h Relative
5¤r¤¤|e Number Acid Value Found
‘ ¤$1JRl_EY een reericxzee co com (Percent) (Percent) (Percent)
 
· IO IO IOM
198 9.8 9.6* 10.5 99
555 9.7 10.0 10.2 99
1142 10.0 9-4* 10-2 98
1600 10.2 9.9 10.9 102
· 20 IO IOM
1143 19.9 10.6 10.3 101
_ CALIFORNIA CHEMICAL COMPANY
IO 20 20M
' 1659 10.0 19.9 20-1 100
16 16 16M
1658 16.0 15-8 16.5 100
` CHILEAN NITRATE SALES CORP
15 0 14KNO3
_ 177 15.0 10.2 100
A COMMONWEALTH FERTILIZER CO CAMREELLSVILLE
zi I2 BM
· 1149 4.8 13.0 8.7 112
` 6 18 12M
1137 6.3 18.7 11.9 103
1138 5.7* 16.7* 11.8 94*
6 za 24M
1139 6.2 24.5 2A.7 103
COMMONWEALTH FERTILIZER C0 RUSSELLVILLE
20 2OM
29 20.9 21.Q 105

 ]_z, REGULATORY BULLETIN 185
TABLE l.— Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent or less
indicated by asterisk.
Munufucyure,. _ Available Percent of _
Grade N'1'°9°“ Phosphoric Pomsh Relative
Sample Number Acid Value Found
<:0MM0r~¤wEAl.rH FEQT co QUSSELLVILLE com (Percent) (Percent) (Percent) .
 
0 12 BM
30 4.5 11.8 9.1 105 .
32 4.6 11.9 B.O 104
161 4.5 12.6 9.0 110
1079 4.7 12.2 B.6 107
5 2O 20M ‘
1076 5.2 19.5* 19.6 99
1148 5.4 19.8 19.9 101 .
6 1B 12M
1146 5.6* 19.2 11.2* 101
R 16 16M
1147 7.3* 17.1 16.2 100 .
10 10 10M
162 8.4* 12.1 10.1 99
1078 10.0 11.5 8.7* 103
COODEQATIVE FEQTILIZED SERV HQIQTOL
 
5 1O 10M _
2 5.2 10.5 10.1 100 I
10 10 10M
3 10.0 10.3 10.3 102 -
10 20 20M _
4 11.4 23.2 18.7* 110
COO¤E¤AT1VE FEQTILIYEF1 SEQV l.OU1$V1l.l.E A
 
15 3(`Wl 11/11*1 QOWON
B5 14.4* 31.1 100
90 16.1 30.3 104
30 3OM I
91 32.5 27.5* 103
97 24.9* 35.6 95*
3 12 12**
1098 3.3 12.2 12.4 104
1663 3.5 l2•2 12.0 104

 COMMERCLAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, FALL SEASON 1964 15
TABLE 1.- Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent or less
indicated by asterisk.
- Mcnufccyurer _ Available Percent of
Grade N‘1"°9E" Phosphoric P°1°Sh Relative
_ 5¤m¤|e Number Acid Value Found
‘ caovsnzxmvra »=e$¤r. ssrzv. . L0u1¤v11.1.E cam. (Percent) (Percent) (Percent)
 
4 12 BM
B6 4-4 11-6* 9-3 104
168 3-9 11-6* 8-6 99
1662 4-6 10-8* 8-9 101
5 20 20M
87 5-0 19-B 20-5 100
_ 169 5-O 20-4 20-3 101
1054 5-0 20-0 20-9 101
1653 5.2 19-8 21-3 102
1665 5-4 19-3* 20-0 100
1 6 12 12M
170 6-O 12-9 12.4 104
1056 6-0 12-5 12-0 102
l 1660 6-O 12-5 12-4 103
10 10 10M
88 10-6 10-1 10-6 104
171 9-7 10-9 10-6 103
1057 10-B 9-7 10-B 104
1652 10.7 9-8 10-8 104
1661 10-1 10-4 10-8 103 _
COOPEFQATIVE FEFQTILIZEFZ SERV PUSSELLVILLE
 
15 3OM WITH BOQON
_ 20 14-7 31 -9 102
93 13-5* 32-7 100
2130 15-3 30-9 103
_ 30 3OM
21 30-5 30-5 102
98 28-6* 32-0 99 V
A 12 BM
22 4-6 11-6* 9-3 105
99 4.4 12-3 9-3 107
1608 4-3 12-9 7-9 106
1684 4-0 12-1 9-5 104
2101 4.4 11-9 8-5 103
2122 4-4 11-3* 8-5 101
2129 4-3 12-4 10-1 109
2132 4-5 11-7 9-2 105
5 20 20M
23 5.3 1 12 12**1
1647 5.7* 12.2 12.4 100
10 30 20*1
‘ 1650 10.3 29.2* 15.6* 95

 22 REGULATORY BULLETIN 185
TABLE l.— Analyses of lnspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent ar less
indicated by asterisk.
Mcnufqcgurey l Available Percent of
Grade Nmogen Phosphoric P°l°Sh Relative `
Scmple Number Acid Value Found
1*1T¤¤NAT 1 0Mm_ M 1 M n Cl·l€?’l c0¤¤ C1’\1C1f\11\lATl (Percent) (Percent) (Percent)
  ·
:4 12 6*/1
528 4.9 13-6 B-O 113 { ·
6 1B 12M
58 5-5* 16-8* 12-7 95*
10 10 10M `
59 9 . 7 9 • 9 10 - 6 99
526 9.1* 10-1 11-3 QB 4
10 20 20M
527 B-B* lB•O* 23-3 95*
1‘JTlT12H/XT IGNAL Mlm r. CHEM CORD C•_A¤»<<\/11.LE
 
is 12 UM _.
127 ¤-6 11-4* 9-O 104
5 1’i 10M
12'B 5-1 10-1 10-7 103
5 P') POW
12'1 5-4 19-1* 20•1 QQ
130 2-6* 10-2 10-F3 100 _
l`l1'ElJN/\TlL)t11\L '*\lM (· CHb"1 CORP S*
 
5 Q'] 20M
1115 6.1 23.7 29.*} 104
5 'QO 20*/1
1111 0.7* 26.0* 27.} 97*
7 P'! 2"l`·*
‘ 116`1 7.7 25.2 2*;%.7 105
9 O !43‘~’l
1116 IO.? ¤l•5*’ 101

 ZA RIEGUIATORY BULLETIN 185
TABLE 1.- Analyses of lnspectian Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values at 97 percent ar less _
indicated by asterisk.
Mgnufqcguyer _ Available Percent at ~
Grade N'"°9°“ Phasphoric P°l°$h Relative
Sample Number Acid Value Found
i_r.»—m 0 im:1 ·.·1A¤.;•10;1¤5 2Tu¤c1 S (Percent) (Percent) (Percent) "
 
Q 7V) ?’1'\4 '
1127 5.2 15.8* 18.2* 95* I
1lC¤‘% 4i.G 1'?'.1* 19.2* @6*
IO 20 20M
115*7 9.9 21.0 17.*3* 9*9
16 25 16M 4
112*1 17.2 1E.1* 23.2 113
"iON7l\t—1TO !\G5`€lC‘.1I_TU*?i\L CENITEDQ
*7 20 2'V/1
112Q ">.Q 22.* 17.5* 107
1130 4.6* 23.2* 26.5 90* ·
'WNYYN }\`·'r`V?[f`l\'l FTrl`—`T]l_l7r:l V'i:)'N7’A’*1Y
A 1.2  
1’§P)1 4.1 10.6* *3.7 QB
11:111 5.0 20.0 19.0 100
1’3"'> 5.1 1B•B* 20.2 ‘17*
1 K 1 1 1"\°\·7
1‘i‘J0 B.?* @•3* 144.7 100
¥’i1"`i··’li"1lO\ V‘;VQT1,_l7‘A? ‘?‘€lTVlC‘€ _
"TT r';`7Ji·`—‘·'fGV" {N1') ‘71'»JlV<
Ti"? F, "., TJQVQTPTD i1_>[\\;(‘* /f'\·jDAr\;v
 

 COI‘1I*l]ZRCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, FALL SEASON 1964 25
TABLE l.— Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent or less
indicated by asterisk.
Mqnufccyurer _ Available Percent of
_ Grade Nitr0g6¤ Phasphoric p°t°Sh Relative
Sample Number Acid Value Found
F Q ¤©vsT¤€:¤ G1;/2N?) C0 ¤¤1CE 'YHFM GW (Percent) (Percent) (Percent)
20 EOM
1583 19.6 19.9 QQ
20 EOM WITH BOQON
1*532 17.5* 19.6 91*
ci 19 QM
70 4.1 11.7 9.% lOO
Q ?O 27%
1055 4.9 19-3* 1Q·6 07*
12 1E 1PM
1584 11.3¤ 1?•” 13-0 101
0 M QCOTT ANO QONQ COMPANY
'>'i 7 7'A
72 2E.U 6.8 7.0 100 _
'QHVIFT 5 CO N/xTl')k1f`.l_ '7T']C1< VAWUQ
5 20 ZOM
1160 5.0 PO·3 10.7 100
10 10 10M
1161 @.8 10-8 11.0 103
l TFWMFTQFF F¤D*"W” 700¤€¤DT1VV
- 1% 15 1*5*4
1546 15.¤ 1%.G 13.5* 102
rin; GTAT? Cr¤*¢v
7 17 'E/VA
1117 2.4 1?.7 Jl.¤* 1OP

 26 R.EGULe\TORY BULLETIN 1.85
TABLE I.— Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, Ju|y—December, I964 °
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent or less
indicated by asterisk. l
Mgngfgcfgrgr _ Available Percent of
Grade N'l'°9°" Phosphcric P°I°Sh Relative
$¤m1>|e Number Acid Value Found
Tm 'T’*" "”"'·`lC"l- "°`·“¤”"Y CONT (Percent) (Percent) (Percent)
557 5.1 18.8* 18.7* 95* _
1117 4.8 19.3* 21.1 99
1120 4.7* 19.7 20.8 99
6 18 12*/1
=13 5.4* 20.6* 27.6 9lA*
1»— 16 1¤‘—1
51 16.0 15.7 161.1 QQ
1~¤C 16.2 15.9 16.0 100
1··f~ 15.9 15.7 16.2 99
1»—?2 16.C 15.5;* 16.3 QQ
141 2O.1‘ 11.2 100

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, FALL SEASON 1.96Z+ 27
V TABLE 1.- Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values af 97 percent ar less
, indicated by asterisk.
Menufecturer _ Available Percent of
. Grade N't'°9°" Phaspharic P°t°$h Relative
Scmple Number Acid Value FOUl’\d
v c CHFfM1CAl_ COMP/\'~1Y cirsncmmxri (Percent) (Percent) (Percent)
 
1") 30*4 WITH POQOM
17*9 9.7 31.3 101
19 191*4 l¤J1TH BOQON
IBO 1B.6* 21.8 IOQ
20 EOM
1106 19.5* 20.9 1OO
». Q 12 BM
151 41.3 12.5 8.2 105
11941 4.0 12.3 B.0 102
5 1O 10M
1B2 ‘5.¤ 9.7 10.2 102
. 5 P0 20M
183 5.1 19.i•* 19.3* 98
i 11C7 5.3 15.9* 19.*5* QB
1O 10 1OM
1Eib C7.7 11.0 10.2 102 '
12 12 l2'-1
18% 12.0 12.2 12.4 101
V . · V C CHEMICAL COMP/'·’~!V HOPKINQVILLE
 
2C 20**1
$07 21.6 17.2* 101
4 12 5*1
29 L.'1 12.5 B.? 103
39 ¤.C1 12.% »'%.‘% 10/A
'*3’3 U.') 12.3 R.2 102
16741 AU`) 12.b O.? 10*:
1679 0.*4 12.6 2.*7 ll")
1682 ~’4.’) 12.4. 9.1 10*4
1583 L.5 12.2 5].7 106
2110 0.1 12.4 @.3 1f`J'1
2121 ’*.'D 17*.5 *%.1 1G?
2127 '3.B 12.7 7.7 100
21MEi ¤.¢. 12.*5 9.1* 1051
21¢•9 it.? 12.3 9.D 1")‘,
2150 ¢¤.`* 12.5 Bni 100
l

 Z8 REGUIATORY BULLETIN 1.85
TABLE l.- Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient mare than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent or less
indicated by asterisk.
Manufacturer N_ Available Percent of V
Grade ""°9·""‘ Phasphoric P°*°$l" Relative
$¤m¤*¤ Number Acid v¤iu- Found . t
1/ C CHE`·i1C/XL. ca !4OD*<1'\|<.\/1l.l.E CONT (Percent) (Percent) (percent)
 
5 20 20M
39 4-7* 19-7 1B-¢A* 96* _
540 5-O 19-6 19-7 99
'5l&1 5-0 19-6 19-0* 9B `
5/45, 5.0 19-5* 20.2 99
6 12 12M
2126 5.9 12-1 12-6 101
ZIQ7 5-9 12-5 11-6* 10l
6 1B 12M
**0 6.2 15-6* 12-1 94* _ '
101 6-Q 17-2* 12-O 99
167] 5-B 16-6* 12-O 99*
1O O BOM
SQ'? 10-4 25-7* 100
IO 10 10'·l
·’·•1 B-9* IO-2 11-O 97*
16511 9-1* IO-4 10-B 98
15 15 l'5i‘·’i
EIQ6 14-0* 16-6* 16-7 9B
V C CHEMICAL CO’Vl¤'tNY MT QLVAQAMT
  A
EO 20**
1J6 19-7 20-O 99
A 12 1*-4:
1`77 5-O 11-3* 12-7 105
¤ PU 2*v
1°72 $-0 19-6* 19-5* 95
1"Q1 5.2 1¤.2¤ 20.0 99 .
: V0 ET" ,·'!`*l ‘?C1¤C"\l
1C`:‘TY ii-B 19-2* 19-3* 96*
` 6 12 12**
16.23 6.1 12-2 11-9 101

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, FALL SEASON 196A 29
TABLE 1.- Analyses of Inspection Samples of Mixed Dry Fertilizers, July-December, 1964
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 percent or less
I indicated by asterisk.
Mcnufqcyurer _ Available Percent of
` A Grade N'"°9En Phospharic Pomsh Relative
Sample Number Acid Value Found
V C CHEMICAL ca MT PLFASANT C')’~1T (percenn (percent) (Percent)
8 241 O
1150 5.9* 19.1* 78*
IO 1O 10M
137 9.7 10.6 11.3 103
1075 9.5* 9.8 10.9 98
1082 10.0 10.0 10.5 101
18 A6 O
V 1629 13.8* 33.8* 75* _
V C CHEMICAL CO\1'~/IP/\