¢· * · 
 .Q _ THE KENTUCKY ALUMNUS. 13 t
S   A track team was organized; but I find no report of its competing in any · .`
N  ` contests.
  Financially, the collegiate year—1906—o7, was a success. _
T  After the new Committee took charge, outstanding bills for the season of
I   1905 and 1906 kept coming in, until the total indebtedness of the Association
5   was $1,579.75. l l
H  yr This was reduced by the close ol the 1906-07 season to $131.23.
 ·,j FALL or 1907. l
  The same Faculty Athletic Committee in charge the preceding year were E
in  reappointed for the year IQO7-08.  
Q The managers of the various branches of athletics were as follows: l
  Football, T. R. Bryant; men`s basketball, Leo Brewer; girls’ basketball,  
  jane \/Vanless; baseball, C. C. Kelley; track, VV. C. Kisel. Mr. Turner continued l
 tj as graduate manager, and Mr. Curtis as treasurer. . l
  Mr. Guyn was retained as coach in football.  
  The team consisted of: Adair (Capt.), center; Hendrickson, left tackle;  
.`  Payne, right tackle; Dunlap, left guard; Clark, right guard; Barbee, left end; L
r;   Elgin, right end; Stone, quarter; \\’Elson, left back; Rodes ("Pete"), right back; Q
fi   Rout, fullback.  
  Substitutes—VValker, Stofer, Brockman, Mathers and \’Vebb. Q
ll   \Nith the exception of a bad defeat by Vanderbilt early in the season the E
  team made a good record, winning all the other games but the one with the
 ._ University of Tennessee, which was a scoreless tie, and improving steadily until I
R   the close. ‘
llc  °i In the game with Vanderbilt in which we were defeated 40 to 0, Dr. Dudley,
lm   of that institution, the dominant spirit of the S. I. A. A., would not consent to
to   our playing one of our best men—M0ntgoniery, who came to us from the V. M.
to  jj. I., on the ground that that institution should rank as a college, and that the one
  year rule should apply in Montgomery`s case. It was reported the following
ch   spring, however, that Vanderbilt played a V. M. I. man on their base ball team,  
llli   who had not been at Vanderbilt for one year, and we know how during the past I
 . year, a special dispensation was obtained by Vanderbilt to enable her to play a ,
Im { former Bethel College man, who would have been debarred by the same rule. `
   E; Also in the game against us, one Campbell, whose eligibility was very much  
° ’ "  in question by the othei colleges in the S. I. A. A., was an important factor in {
wo  Qi our defeat. His ineligibility was afterwards admitted to me by a member of the  
 f Vanderbilt faculty, who did not stand for that sort of thing. {
of   The scores with which we defeated the other institutions that year were as Q
I] I   f0ll0ws: Manual Training, 30 to o· Morris Harvey, 20 to o; lrlanover, 40 to 0; I
O 0   Maryville, 5 to 2; Georgetown, 30 to 0; C, U. (Tlianksgivingl, II to 0; and K.  
 Z U., 5 to 0, The latter game was postponed from a date before Thanksgiving to  
lm,  { GHG after on account of the very bad weather which prevailed on the day on  
  which it was originally scheduled.  
#·  l
  1 `
 . a
2  !
_ 1
 A l ‘ _