]f(’}llLl(('L`l/ 4l{}I'tt‘llHl(7`([[ .E.1`l)(’I`l·})1v(}I{ N/lz/{mz lil
Mile slight exeess of finely ground limestone or burnt lime would
1. he added to neutralize the soil and after the disappearance of
V 1110* ~ ,
° ‘ the exeess, the rock phosphate would be added. Tl1e use ot
rock phosphate and tl1e proper return of lllE1lllll`C and residues
iter- would probably thereafter provide sufficient calcium.
mus Below are given the yields from the various soil treat-
l`€` ments under consideration;
du1·— _
x Limestone was used 111 tl1ese ex verniients at the rate of
,V€ll_ _
we two tons per aere per rotation. On all the fields except Camp-
1 . . ,
am, bellsville, aeld phosphate was used at the rate ot S00 pounds
wer aere and roek whos whate at the rate ol? 1600 wounds Jer
ous. _ _} l l
I of aere per rotation applied on eorn ground. Rock phosphate
new was plowed under, while aeid phosphate and limestone were
disked in on wlowed <··round. Tl1e rates ol? whos whate aw wliea—
>f ¤ . . eV . l l
tions are stated with Yield data at Cam whellsville.
wend ·
wver _ _ _ ‘ _ ‘
_b1 Soul Type and Aczdlty of These Fields. \
1 e. ___________;_;_____i_g_,ii?l_é_
` I
- 1 l\<·il11nyT»<·;1o¢·:1t111’ silt loam e... V ..rr V ..... V VV.V E til) - ` 1040
l·`:1risto11r—Silt loam {not iwwappcd) ,V__     Vl 550 wo
lll(? Camipl><·lls\‘illr·—Silt loam ,V .....V.   ..  ......., V .... l T2 Jill]
  _l_____ `
hos- "‘-‘"— *;“·"‘—·*··—
l OH ();.llO treatnieiit
Lselimc-sto11<·. ·
llO\\' l\l';:1<·i¤l plxosplwale.
]ll);l'(l('l( pliosphate.
llOS- ]{i]i(J[1li<§