I
!
1  
I
I
I .
I , .
I .
  Q ., 4.   I {VW  l  A
            V V   »_‘~   _VJ V 'V , -V `           ”,'·   __A»_¢.     I
I                               I r·· ~~     
I            A““              V     I     `  e     4
  M   '           V. '    » · `    *2.21   ·;···‘` I 1
‘ ~ ··\_  2 V    ‘’v’i   . J ,.. _-  
`V i ?:‘ ''V/ "   . ¢— •. `Vi   
_   , ;  I _ r E
l 4 ` I     ·    V_;jw;r"“    
  . 71 I   ·    1
E V _ ~ iz   -.;·:~
· V =z   is   °
A vi > #- . V
I     .   1%;; K gi A
_ ____ _; »   ,,;» V.     .»*
I V I   ·_Llg\V V   f i  
Ul. V     f··-.V'* iwggl _`;   I 1    
’         ;V‘’ .» . 1 .   = . is *r2>  % A *·. * . sx  I
 ..2   "   " I ·• 'I     ' : ‘ *V —~ )` ‘   I I li`}: il I
t w, _($) { I.   · ·V ;’   ’V Vl, ‘ V   l
V= - · "7• I .`· ‘ - I J
— . •$§2=·. --·· A   ., I I 4
  wr We.   ,
, .   ‘ V . ..   ‘¤ ‘ ** —V
= *       . 2-  » = . I
l The 1993 Great Dqvid M. Olsfer, His- ’ ‘ " "   ” ' . bilities that comprise the workload of °
I O O I _ _ _
l T°°°h°"‘ "‘{°'° h°“' '°"Y/H°"‘°"$ P"°' vI$IOI'I {Of 'IIIG FlI'I'I.II‘E I faculty in the university system and
cred with ¤ lun- grum; Cynthia E. V V V VV I ll h f d . .
cheon ¤t the King Barber, Lexington . SPC   Out [ 6 Process Pr Fmflmmng
Alumni House. Here CommunilyCoIIege; The UK Board of Trustees has 5 a ‘D1fferent1ated Distribution of V
Y"°h P"°"d°'" °°“°ld M°l°Y/ P‘{d' approved a strategic plan setting the I Effort’ for each faculty member and
Wethinglon ure the uc¤h Community . . , f _ h f. l h d . l . ,,
honoreesllmmlelll Ccllegelvemell university s goals O1 t e next ive V eac e ucationa unit.
Joel M. Lee, College Lurkin-Bussell, Hop- years and a first-ever UK faculty work- 1 VV*V iici é' V V VVVW ''‘‘'‘' V V V
. · • » • _ I
I °f A"'°d H°°I'h’ k'""2I‘ilC°'“"‘”";'*l?' load policy statement. GOIIIQ "I"0III TWO 'I'0 FOIIP I
o e e, ¤n . ,
lcmis Holler, Among other goals, the strategic E   V VVVVV     VV VVV'V’VVVV‘VVV V VVVV
l Dep¤r1ment of plan calls for UK to: I A new national survey shows the
l5I;;:{‘:Y‘ Tl'°ll;K • Increase its private donations to University of Kentucky community col-
i ssociui n . . » . . . ‘
has presenled llw $25 lUlll101] annually from the current lege system ranks high in companson to I
¤w¤rds since 1961. rate ofabout $528 million; other states in the number of students
Ph°*° by K°" G°°d‘ • Complete construction of the transferring to four-year institutions.
l new libraiy by 1996; The survey shows 36.1 percent of
l • Increase to $5120 million each year 1 Kentucky’s community college stu-
`
the amount of research grant money   dents who began their studies in
attracted b ¤ the universi ’s facul ; i 1987, and com leted at least four col-
} P
• Increase graduate enrollment to lege credit courses, transferred to a
5,500 students and doctoral enroll- l state college or university. The nation- 1
lllelit to 1,850. I al average was 22 percent, according
Other enrollment goals for the to the data. 1
university were also established. Tony Newberry, vice chancellor for I
The university`s first faculty work- academic affairs for the UK commu-
I load policy statement was designed by nity college system, said, “We are very j
a faculty committee headed by geog- pleased with the results. They verify
ra yhy rofessor, Karl Raitz. what we have known all alon .
_ I . P S
  Raitz said the faculty policy state- Community college counselors and
  ment "clescribes the diverse responsi- faculty are doing an excellentjob in
I
I
  2 lieiitiirki .\luumu~ Summer ]9Q3 ~
I
I
I