Collections: 
0-9 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Image 166 of Annual report. 1896

Part of Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station

item | thumbnails | details | text | pdf
Download this image
rr . JW .?·"‘ *¢* `>; * > <`. ms Bu//viz); No 6;. " A Y,. ii]; In the preceding table we have given in the iilrst j, f'· column the name of the brand , next, where the sample- 3 '‘,” i" , was taken; then the " station number," and. lastly, the Y ~· analysis and valuation. The same order is preserved in ° the table as in the description of the samples, hence it is ·;; ·, _j' not necessary to repeat the name of the manufacturer. g. ` '· In the case of each brand, the official analysis is iirst E; f Y, if given, in bold-faced type, for comparison. This oiiicial J·. ij,. analysis is the same as the analysis that was on the tag-7 . . attached to the sack irom which the sample was taken- ~•r_ M. A,. SCOVELL, Director. . Q j' i A. M. PETER, g . , V I .' H. E. CURTIS, S Ohcmtsts. · , V December 31st, 1896. n ». 4) _ aI * . · ii