** `>; * >
<`. ms Bu//viz); No 6;. " A
Y,. ii]; In the preceding table we have given in the iilrst
j, f' column the name of the brand , next, where the sample-
3 ', i" , was taken; then the " station number," and. lastly, the
Y ~ analysis and valuation. The same order is preserved in
the table as in the description of the samples, hence it is
;; , _j' not necessary to repeat the name of the manufacturer. g.
` ' In the case of each brand, the official analysis is iirst E; f
Y, if given, in bold-faced type, for comparison. This oiiicial
J. ij,. analysis is the same as the analysis that was on the tag-7
. . attached to the sack irom which the sample was taken-
~r_ M. A,. SCOVELL, Director. . Q
j' i A. M. PETER, g . , V
I .' H. E. CURTIS, S Ohcmtsts.
, V December 31st, 1896.