_ 3E
31. COUNTY CORRESPONDENCE OF THE STATE DIRECTORS OF THE ‘
HISTORICAL RECORDS SURVEY, O. B. WILDER AND THOMAS D. CLARK.
1936. 1.2 cu. ft.
Arrangement is by district number, thereunder alpha-
betical by subject. A second portion is arranged alphabetically
by county.
All of the correspondence concerns routine administrative
matters. Subjects include address of workers, efficiency,
instructions to workers, labor reports, time reports, and
other matters.
It appears as though the original filing system tried to
place all correspondence according to district and thereunder
by subject. The amount appears to have increased so dramati-
cally that arrangement by county was deemed most suitable by
HRS.
32. COUNTY CORRESPONDENCE OF THE STATE DIRECTOR OF THE .
HISTORICAL RECORDS SURVEY, WALTER M. HOEFELMAN. 1936-1939.
2.8 cu. ft.
Arrangement is alphabetical by county followed by a
miscellaneous file arranged chronologically. ‘
This correspondence is administrative in nature covering
many of the same subjects in series 31. Some of the corres-
pondence labeled "confidential" deals with personal matters
regarding field workers.
The miscellaneous papers were found mixed, whereas county
correspondence was marked according to the county.
33. DISTRICT OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE FILES, HISTORICAL RECORDS {
SURVEY. 1936-1939. 2.4 cu. ft.
Arrangement of the series is by district number. Sub-
series arrangement is chronological.
This correspondence, routine in nature, includes labor I
reports, travel requests, personnel requisitions, supply
requisitions, and project reports. Districts one and three
are represented. I
34. ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIAL, AM RICAN IMPRINTS. 1938-1939. .
A eu. ss. I
Arrangement is chronological by month. %