Franh'-'ort, Kent cky
.-aliary 15, 1920
Ronormlhe Ri ch ,rd C. Stoll.
Cbalrman of 07e3*ative Coox,5Atee
Itn5.versIt y of Kentucky
My dear Sir!
This office is in receipt of your letter of Januavy
14th in Whict you ask if Seetion 13 of Chapter'.12 of -the
Aots of 1918; which Chapter is the Avt -;reat-ng the Sud-
get Appioprla+.ion Cbmmiission, repeals the arnnal appropri-
ation of $62,000 a year t-o the 'University of ;Ceztucky for
Agrioutltra' Extensionu Work, maZe unaer the provisions of
Chapter 12'7 of the AcT.i of 391-!.
Chapter 12 of tue Acts of 1918 creatizg the Budget
Appropriation Goramissnon adrl defir.a1g 5.-Ls -l';es aed
powe."s, was approved ljr tlhe oover:rc' on Jaxloi i6, 1918,
and C!hapter 127 o^ the AoLa nr 1918 :r.t th, aiynual
approroiation ico :he Uariveirsi';y of Tent-;aky for A.g1,loul-
tural. Exitensicn Work was %pprovcd o02 llarci 29. t9.,8
The Buaget Approprlacjon Cornmissiom Xaw- a not ocarry an
Emergenvy Clause. Ohapter 1277, above referred to, did
carry aii Emergeno- Claa.se. Seotior. 13 of the Budget
Apyrorriation Coza'nissio-. Act provides as follows:
OA11 appropriatiors heretofore made and
oontiauaiag from year to yca. wider previous
laws are heretb retpealed upon the taking effect
of appropriations made pursuant to the provis-
ionc of thi.s ae-. "
Seotion 19 of the same act provides; wAll
aots and parts of acts in oonfl-io, herewith
are hereby repe^.1ed to the exceut of such oon-
It is the opinion of this offioc that section 13;
and seotion 18 :eoessarily referred to laws in ef.fe-t at
the date of the passage of the Budget Alpropriatwii Co;6.
mission act, whioh necessariiy was before Mavesh 16,. :lc .T)
At the time section 13 was enacted4 Chapter 12.7 of t11." ?ots
of 1918 was not a law, and it would seemn to this Oi!53-
thai it Would necesnoarily follow that sections 13 anid IS
Would.. 'b no applicatlon to ohftpter ;27 of the Ac:i-s ot -.9318.