i1 ’7
1 ti
1 11
‘ a
i1
  VN
1
c
a
DESEIYF STORM  
 
1 i V tc
conipilecl by `     1 O
Kay _]oh ll son   I T
    tl
“ ,1 it
 1 it
i` b
, . . . · P
1 Q. Never Iaefore has our power   Just brute stre11gth w1tl1 a lot of the   S(
  played flue kind of lead role if l1igl1 tecI111ology equipment we have,  1 C]
1 has ln fltis wor. How do you eval- so women ca11 be used. The reason _ at
uofe flte mlllfury sfrufegy l·l•¤l· they haven’t been used more than tl1ey 1
has unfolded so fur? 1 l1ave is because Congress feels public 1 q.
1 . . , . ’
1 1 op1111on wouldn t support it. A11d so   U.
1 A. America is a high tech C()llllll`}’.   there’s a COllgl`€SSlOH2ll restriction { bi
1 Countries typically prefer to fight their   against using women i11 a11y situation i U
1 . ’ . . ` . 1 ` ` ‘ .
1 wars in a style compatible w1tl1 the daily 1 that could be called a combat ]ob. .
whe ol as. . . -   ·. . **1
,h:Il:¤r;;;;¤   life style of that SOCICI)/.‘l“()l` America,   l But, thereare those wl1o tl1111k this g O.
began asking 1 this means a high tech military capahil- 1 15 obsolete, left over from our earlier his- { q1
,‘:‘“°::;:: °:°';* 1 ity. It is true that aerial bombing has 1 tory, that those restrictions should be   q1
e e as . . . · . . . 1
u_s_ mm"'; 1 notldehyered the kind of conclusive   eliminated. There are other people who   rc
slrulegy und military results 111 the past that so111e of 1 sayjust the reverse, tl1at \V()Ill€ll CHI] do   U.
"’°"Pa"‘; ‘“‘;l "‘° the more e11tl111siastic air power fans 1 certain kinds of military tasks, but i11 i U.
e ee s ¤ wm- . . , . i
on me American have cla1med, but, here we have as1tt1a—   other respects theyre kill lIlCOIlV€— 1 in
psyche, they tion which may be made to order for   ntence, 111 the way, tl1ey C21l],t do things   zu
l3°:‘°‘l lg": 1 the sort of high tech weaponry of the l until provisions are made for them. s dj
n vers o 1 . . ’ . E 1 ‘
KeM“ky_ so dla   United States. Admittedly and obvious- 1 I So, you hear that debated both ways j (H
we. We are also 1 ly, if we’re going to be 111 l.ll1S war, we 1 111 Washington. But, we’re going to N
"°"‘l‘:"9 °_"* ll';   want to do it in such a way as to mini- find out. This war is kind ol` a research 1
OUP I IIIIIIII III 1 · . 1. . . . . . 1
swdems sup   tnize casualties and loss of life on our laboratory for testing notjust 11ew 1
lioned In the war   side. That means we wa11t to use high weapons, but for testing a lot of the Q
"“° ‘*’"l’ " "°9"' 1 tech capabilities in lieu of human be- changes in American society i11 a mili-
lar newsleller 1 . . . ./, - el
N umm bl, whom   ings tI we can, what llSC(l to be called tary context. For example, it s the first w
we have an 5 manpower. Not H121ll[)()WCI`ll] a gender war that’s come_ alo11g since A1nerica11’s gg
"'::';°“· I'; |"'°' se11se because one ofthe interesti11g quit using tobacco products in large   sl
¢ we e on . . . ‘ , L
In, ochber? To z things about this particular set of hos- numbers. It used to be ifyou were a sol-   In
edd an ulumnus tilities from tl1c U.S.y1ew1s that for the dter, they came 2l1`0Lll]Cl a11d gave you 1 PI
*° "‘° "‘“m"9 first time in the histor ` f` V ° " ·‘
_ . 1 . . y ol the U.S. we tec cigaicttcs.
list send lhenr . ` 1
' name and have very substantial numbers ofyoung 1 I can remember wl1e11 I was a young A_
, address to UK women who, 1f not at the front lines, are i Naval officer you got cigarettes in lots N
N°"°""l Al"""‘l cert·1i11lyin the combat tl1e·1ter i of` l' · * ` 1 · i 1 i
. . . .. 1 p aces. Thats 11ot the case any — d
Assoclullon . ‘ . = . . .. . . . ’ l
Lexanghnl KQ I \'\()l'll(fIl can do almost any ol the   longer. It s a different l{lD(l of war in   th
#$0506-6119. jobs the men can do. Smit don`t need 1 lots of ways, sort of` testing the new   bc
§|
ti l{L'HllI(`l§\' .*\l\lll\l\ll\ Spring mt,]   SP