xt76m9020q0p https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt76m9020q0p/data/mets.xml   Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station. 1965 journals 159 English Lexington : Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Kentucky Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Progress report (Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station) n.159 text Progress report (Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station) n.159 1965 2014 true xt76m9020q0p section xt76m9020q0p   Results of the ,
  KENTUCKY SOYBEAN A
  PERFORMANCE
  TESTS-1965
U J ]. F. SI-IANE, LEO LINK, I
· S. H. PHILLIPS, J. w. HERRON
_, and CHARLES TUTT
;·, `~I Or (6
a
I; PROGRESS REPORT 159 I
Q UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
‘ s AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
A DEPARTMENT or Acnouom
SI Lexingfon
4

 4-
ek
LOCATION OF THE 1965
SOYBEAN 1>EEFORMANcE TESTS
e
 
se.
EE? b'
s   .
@¤~‘°*”“”@“€'@»  cs ’ 
as Mw  E
  —
~·E¤» 1% w ise`? siemie
8 · ' 4 I
@ é‘@%@@°% @M@ ¤“
@'·-i? "E¤¤w @%%¢? ’&°
uhm _
 
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ’
Acknowledgment is made to the Owensboro Grain Company, ,4 ‘
Owensboro, and the Ellis Elevator Company and Henderson Elevator
Company, Henderson, for their cooperation in the soybean tests y_
at Henderson; also to county agents and others who assisted in
conducting the tests. Special acknowledgment is made to farmer K
cooperators Allan and Joe Toy, Henderson; Paul Payne, Mayfield; F
and Robert Sanger, Hickman. Chemical analyses for protein and ’
oil were made by the U. S. Regional Soybean Laboratory, Urbana,
Ill. and the University of Kentucky Department of Feed and
Fertilizer. e
Location Soil [ype BH Phosphorus Potassiunf
l. Henderson Falaya silt loam 6.3 Medium Low ’
2. Princeton Pembroke silt loam 7.5 High Low 9
3. Mayfield Grenada silt loam 6.2 Low Low
4. Hickman Commerce silt loam 7.8 High Medium,•
a
  ‘
{
(2) ,.,
I 1

 >$
"$
Qi RESULTS OF THE KENTUCKY SOYBEAN
_ PERFORMANCE TESTS — 1965
,‘ The Objective of the Kentucky Soybean Performance tests
is to provide an estimate of the relative performance of
»· standard soybean varieties and to provide information on the
performance of improved strains of soybeans in the U. S. Reg- A
` sional Soybean Laboratory Tests. Included in the testing
/ program are herbicide tests, rate-of-planting and fertilizer
* tests, seed treatment tests and molybdenum tests.
g Soybean production in Kentucky for 1965 was estimated
Q) at 6,864,000 bushels. Production in 1964 was 5,850,000 bu-
_ shels and 4,915,000 bushels for the period 1959-63. Average
*yie1ds per acre were 24 bushels for 1965, 22.5 bushels for
‘ 1964 and 23.6 bushels for l959·63.
g EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
. Soybean tests were conducted at four locations in the
major soybean—producing area of the state. The testing lo-
. ., cations are shown on the map on page 2. The field at
Henderson was planted on May 6, that at Princeton on May 4, `
p T$Mayfie1d on May 13 and Hickman on May 14.
n 5 Fieid Design
5 Each variety and experimental strain was planted in
ia three plots at all locations with individual plots being 4
rows wide and 19 feet long. The seeding rate was 10 viable
`¢seed or 12 seed per foot of row except in the rate-of-
planting and fertilizer test where 6, 9, and 12 viable seed
' per foot of row was planted.
5 Yield
• A 16-foot section from each of the 2 center rows was
nqharvested for yield. Plants were cut by hand and threshed
with a small nursery thresher. The yield of the varieties
¥·is reported as bushels per acre at 13.0 percent moisture. I
R
*6
#5
ii
4
_ (3)

 9
1
$2
Date Matured
The date when the pods are dry and most of the leaves `
have dropped. Stems are also dry, under most conditions. ,
Maturity may also be expressed as days earlier (-) or later
(+) than a standard variety. ·»
Lodging ‘
¢
Lodging is based on a scale of l to 5: l = almost all
plants erect; 2 = all plants over slightly or a few down; Q
3 = all plants over moderately or 25%-50% down; 4 = all plants
over considerably or 50%-80% down; 5 = all plants down badly. .
Seed Quality »-
Quality is also based on a scale of l to 5: g
l = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor. ,
Chemical Composition
Percent oil and percent protein content determined from $· —
a composite sample. Percentage composition is expressed on a A.
moisture-free basis. "
Pur le Stain c`
9
The amount of purple stain is based on a scale of l to 5:
l = no purple stain; 2 = l to 3%; 3 = 4 to 8%; 4 = 9 to 19%; 0-
5 = over 20%.
 
" ,
·e
s
5
ws -
w
¢·
 
(4)

 Q
I G ‘
Ln "? .. "‘
UW ° FI
G ' l··| .
0 · .—: oo
A ® ' F4 x '
" mc! -}: ch · :-: cx · 00
"'..-: 10 • N ·-: · cx :-1
,,. gm · .-: .-: · cw ·—:
’ :,4.: »-e qr · 0 .-:
mm q · 0 N
·  E ¤» 'T 4 22 "' gm
,"; an · M cn mw
Q) cw · N cw 4_,:>»
cn · vn cn :
_.;¤-• cu N · :\ co -:< wc
· :4 N · :n N :0 -:< (D5
G UU ° q- C": kD G U]
-m '$<¤ 00 cw 'k ‘“
·¤> __,\ N ¤·:°-x E _k-:<
·¤ ‘ :1 ..-: 4; 4.: »-: 4:
>" >`°¤¤ :4 w 4-: ··-: O
&¤ m .;¤ r>» cvs Ex 0 4-: ¤
W ao -3: .0 *0 0 :1;:
, C1 ·-: :21 cc cn
·•' Ad w u: ...4 3
6*;** u: 4.: cu »-: O
..4 gz .-: 0
_.¤> :4 eu 0
“"" ‘° M 5)
{Q :> (
ae:
gi

 Q
 CU
 1-1 1:* _
  O 1\ O O O O O <*’1 O O ,_
 Z3 JJ N N 0"1 1-4 1-4 1-4 N 1-4 r-4 1-4
   
i `
i I\ Q I-O O\ 0*7 N O O O\ O r,}
 .-1 Ch c¤ O xc GN O O Ch 1~ 1\
 SN 1-I 1-4 N 1-4 1-4 N N 1-I 1-4 1-4 41,
51
 C2
 •;)4 CD RO 1-4 ® Q Q ® O N |\ J
4-lng Q Q cw L4"} nn nn nn cn 1-1 Q
B Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 4
pd
Org Q N 0'1 O O kD w N 1-4 CO
 G . . . . . . . . . .
1-1 111 00 10 10 1\ Q Q xc rn Q 1\
1 q) -4 1-4 1-4 1-4 1-4 r-4 1-4 1-4 1-4 1-I
LD cn
1-fw ' »
10 4 ·
cw :3
1-4 · ..0 .
 "U1-I
·~  QJ cu 1\ O O O 1\ 1\ O 1\ cn r\ 1\
C;  Q) :; . . . . . . . . . . . ’_
O U] 05 Q Q N N 1-4 Q N 1-4 1-4 Q
U1 I
$-4 II
w S
"U ` •~ UW ‘
G JJ ¤ \O CX) ® ® |\ ® CD N Q Q O Q`
::1:9  U: I-4 C"7 FW 0'W 00 0"1 N 0'7 Q <"'> 0"> · ’
T Sj-
1  1 $:1
 on O 1\ O O cw M 1\ m O O cu ,1
U  rg ¤ . . . . . . . . . . U
U)  3 •1-I N N N N N 1-4 1-4 N N N {L4
CU
E·4 -.-1,*
l Ci
GJ UDQV
U 'U -1-4
G  CD G) O CD OO kD CD ® Q ® Ul _ ‘
qi  JJ $-1 C'} N N N O\ ON N N 1-4 N e
E ¢U D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $-1
 Q JJ Ch OW O\ O Ch ON ON O\ O O O
O l CU 1-4 1-4 1-4 LH _
*4-4 E
H ! E _
CL)
cu < 1.1*
 ·}< CD -1-4
G "U}-4 U,
GS 1-40 (D xD xD kD O Ch ~. :>•::1 M on N m N N N sn m cn *
O 49 U,) Q)
(D I 15 gb.
I l C'} C 84
N s 10 -.-1 111**
= 1.1 £>» 1-1 ·-1-1 _
GJ ‘ QJ M Ad C4 J3 YU QJ 4-4 *4-1 ,*
1-4 -1-4 JJ $-4 4-4 GJ 1-4 'U gx JJ 1-4 'U ·1-4
,0 1 1-1 1:: cu cu ·0 QJ 1:*. 0 1-1 0 Q
(U N Q) 1-4 1-4 O0 ,.C‘. ·1-4 K} U -1-4 O {
H > I!. U U O V3 1-1 3 U3 E Z -k
y0
(6)
fo

 ¤§
"`Z·
ra
R .
-3
S
GUI kD C"} N U`I {I' N I-O I-O ®
_ gw-U . . . . . . . . .
K I—|GJ UW C"7 kD \g mg . . . . . . . . . »
dg;}. {D N I—| N OG N I-! N O'} N
. ig
I-I
·; . •~.
G I-Ic'. I-I N 00 xo cn Q cn cw 0
,___3 ml-I » ¤¤
O
ԤC/J 0*7
kD
I
s‘·s· M I2
C") kD ·I-I
` 4.I I-I {>»
—,€ U O hd W Q '.I.‘ O I-`I W
1
kr;  

 7
1
GJ
I-4 G (XD OO C O O O C) O O 4_
Qi ,,-4 • • • • • • • • • lg
$.1 qi I-I I-4 N N I—4 I-4 I-4 I-4 I-I
:1 JJ
D-I CD 7
I\ U'} (X) ON O Ch Q ON r—4 y
I-4 O I—4 O1 O\ ® ® ® I-4 I—4
·I-4 ei N N I—4 I-4 I-4 I-4 I-4 N N
Q 9
ci .
-5 I\ O M Q- cw xc M -• S I-I N N M on cn M I-I N I-I JI
(D Q q)
U
I C: 9 .
· on 1:.* cu
Q KO •I-4 $-4 Q-Q
4-¤ I-I :>~. av
cu cu Ad Ad 4-I ::1 cu .¤ u-I
I-4 •I-4 $-4 $-4 JJ JJ I—4 "U G} ’U I-! *4-4 19
»-D $-4 KU Ki I: O I-4 O 'U C} Q) ·I-4
ru cu I-I I-4 cu 0 -I-I 0 ¤0 ··-4 .¤ Q
H > U U bd V1 512 td O DJ Vi -1< e
(8) vn
if

  
·•·¢
"$
:-4C} O O O O O C"7 O O C) C
` ¤_‘,'_‘ • • n • • • • • • •
* 15445 :-4 :-4 :-4 :-4 N N N N :-4 N
  A
kD LO U`4 0*7 N kD l\ N C ®
"X :-4 ® G7 ® w CD ® CO 4\ G7 xD
-:-4% :-4 :-4 :-4 :-4 :-4 :-4 :-4 :-4 :-4 :-4 ·
S O
* 4::
-:-4 LO N 
Y CDC/3 ‘
B
"4m
nf) :-4
_O7 TJ:-4 •
8--4 QJKU O O O C"7 O €"7 O |\ CD O .4 0*0
GS -40 ® \.O O :-4 O U'4 CD O\ (XD ·4D :-4 N N :-4 :-4 N N N N N G)
·;O ¤¤ 0*U
U} CCD
BJ-4
·\·l UJ
"’· m cum
V7 kD 4-4-I>
>; -4-4 :>» 44-44-4
ev :14 ,2 un x 4-4 ¤ .-¤ -:-444:
:-4 -:-4 4-4 Ex $-4 -4-4 -4-4 :-4 "U G) :-4 @{31
QD $-4 4U YU E O :-4 O "U CU Q)
NS KU :-4 KU :-4 (U U -:-4 O OD ,.C.‘ Q) -K-)<
H > O 3 U bd V-4 U1 411 O VJ :-4 -1c
4.:
is (9)

  
1*
Q) 4.
I-{Q ®I\©©© OCOOC CCDCOG CD ~
F-IGS r—|r—iC\lL\1<"5 v·—|¤—|v-|¤--|r—| v-|¤—|v-Ir-Iv-l u-I
,’j·LJ
D-ICD
.9
v-·|®l!'\L!`I¤-I (\|G\r—|Q"O'\ |\®CDO\|-O (X)
•r··|$ CD®O\O\O\ I\I\\OL¤|\  030::Ar/> ¤:‘¤O»-1¤ r=¤•-annum Q ..1
9
(10)
lv

 ·7
fz
able 7.- Soybean Herbicide Test -Henderson and Hickman, 1965 `
*5 Henderson Hickman
Eeatment Bu/Acre*-Clark 63 Bu/Acre* - Hood .
`leck 20.0 18.3
pipen 27.0 27.3
ernam - incorporated 21.1 25.9
iedbeads 24.1 20.9
flan - incorporated 19.9 20.2
orox 28.9 26.2
Znap + CIPC 25.6 24.8
 rod ..-.. 21.9
Not significant statistically. `
éble 9.- Soybean Arasan and Molybdenum Tests - Henderson, 1965
iety Arasan Molybdenum
Bu/Acre Bu/Acre
E
lark untreated 26.7 35.9
Trk treated 33.9 33.7
dbd untreated 30.3 32.4
••d treated 35.2 30.5
-Eifference required for significance: .05 = 4.4 bu.
`le 9.- Soybean Rate-of-planting-Fertilizer Test, Henderson, 1965
-7 Number of viable seed per foot of row MA
; iety 6 6* 9 9* 12 12*
Bushels per acre**
lark 63 32.5 28.9 27.8 34.0 30.0 30.7
fu
ood 28.3 31.4 28.1 30.1 28.7 29.2
z
200# 5-20-30 special
*‘No significant differences.
wz
Z.!
W
z
$· (11)

  
 
9
9.
C
O
I
9,
l
D
I- .
G
r.
R-
 
9
5
lk
4M—2-66
Q