xt7bk35mb69b https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7bk35mb69b/data/mets.xml   Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station. 1972 journals kaes_bulletins_211 English Lexington, Ky. : The Station, 1885- Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin n.211. text Bulletin n.211. 1972 2014 true xt7bk35mb69b section xt7bk35mb69b I Regulatory Bulletin 211
REPORT OF
ANALYSES OF OFFICIAL
A FERTILIZER SAMPLES
yum 1971-]UNE 1972
 Q§:;:%*¢
 
University of Kentucky
College of Agriculture
Agricultural Experiment Station
Lexington

 
 DIVISION OF REGULATORY SERVICES 3
KENTUCKY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
H, F. Massey, Director
W, J. Huffman, Coordinator
Fertilizer & Pesticide Programs
Neville Hulette, Auditor
FIELD STAFF
wilson M. Routt Claude E. Hensley William K. Robertson
Elmer Cottongim Wallace L. King Eugene G, Vanderpool
Ben W, Cox Ellis Hugh Ray Samuel D. Whitehead
LABORATORY STAFF
Valve C, Midkiff, Chief Chemist
and Coordinator Chemical Laboratories
John T. Adair John A, Shrader (Microscopist) Ellen Perry
Elizabeth Brown Debra Morris Robert N, Price
Judy Dombrowski Norma Holbrook Carolyn Sue Herald
This report compiled and prepared by H. F. Massey and W. J. Huffman
Analytical data by Laboratory Staff

 
 l CONTENTS 5
Page
Explanation of Tables .................. . ........................................ 6
Explanation of Certain Columns ................................ . ................. 7
Companies Represented by Samples Reported in This Bulletin. ..................... 8 _
Computing Coefficient of Variation ............................................. l2
"wild" Samples ................................................................. l3
Table l - Analyses of Inspection Samples of Fertilizers ...................... ..14
Table 2 — Average Analysis and Coefficient of Variation of Samples Analyzed .... 54
7 Table 3 - Analyses of Inspection Samples of Organic Materials .................. 6h
Table 4 - Results of Analyses of Boron in Fertilizers Reported in Table l ..... .64
Fertilizer Manufacturers Doing Business in Kentucky ..................... . ...... 66

 6 REGULATORY BULLETIN 211
This bulletin contains the results of analyses of 1,976 official samples
of commercial fertilizer made during the period July l, 1971 through June 30,
1972.
Separate tables are provided for the results of the analyses for nitro-
gen, available phosphoric acid and soluble potash, organics and boron.
EXPLANATION OF TABLES
The information given in the following tables should be useful in deter-
mining how nearly a manufacturer is meeting the chemical guarantee printed
on the bag or tag for the fertilizer represented by the samples listed. This
may be done by comparing the "grade" with the actual analysis listed under
An additional means of comparing guarantees with the analyses of samples
is in the percent of relative value found, shown in the column RV. The fol-
lowing examples illustrate how this relative value is calculated:
A 5-10-15 fertilizer is guaranteed to contain 5 units of nitrogen,
l0 units of available phosphoric acid (PZO ) and 15 units of potash (KZO).
Factors for computing the relative value of these plant foods are : 3 for nitro-
gen, 2 for available phosphoric acid and l for potash. Thus the combined guar-
anteed value of the product represented is calculated:
5.0 Units of Nitrogen x 3 = 15.0
10.0 Units of Available Phosphoric Acid x 2 = 20.0
15.0 Units of Potash x l = 15.0
Total computed guaranteed value 50.0
The same procedure is followed for "found va1ues." Assuming a sample
of 5-10-15 was found to contain 5.1 units of nitrogen, 10.2 units of avail-
able phosphoric acid and 15.1 units of potash, the relative found value is
computed:
5.1 Units of Nitrogen x 3 = 15.3
10.2 Units of Available Phosphoric Acid x 2 = 20.4
15.1 Units of Potash x 1 = 15.1
50.8
50.8 (computed found value of sample) divided by 50.0 (computed guaranteed
value) times 100 (to arrive at percentage) gives 101.6 as the percent of rela-
tive value found.
The analyses indicated by an asterisk are deficient more than the toler-
ance. Occasionally an analysis may be found that appears to be inconsistent
in its marking. For example, two samples that are guaranteed 10% available
phosphoric acid may both be found to contain 9.7%. One of these may have an
asterisk and the other not. There are two factors that may cause this differ-
ence.
(Continued)

 . COM ERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY JULY, 1971 — JUNE, 1972 7
l. These tolerances are calculated by an electronic computer and applied
to the laboratory analyses before these data are rounded off to the nearest
tenth of a percent. In the above example, the laboratory found 9.66% for
one sample and 9.74% for the other. The first one would be starred as de-
ficient.
2. The grade is written by using the largest whole number in the guarantee
of each ingredient. For example, a custom-mixed lot of fertilizer may be
guaranteed 0-ll.9-11.2. The grade would be written 0-ll-ll. However, the
tolerances are calculated on the 11.9% and 11.2% guarantee. If this fertil-
izer analyzed 11.3% A.P.A. and 10.9% potash, the 11.3% A.P.A. would be
e starred because this analysis is 0.6% units below the 11.9% guarantee.
In some samples a deficiency in one nutrient is accompanied by an over-
run in another nutrient. This may be evidence of improper mixing or weighing
by the manufacturer, Extreme variations of this kind cannot be attributed
— to separation of materials (segregation) after the product is bagged though
this may be a minor factor. Excess of one nutrient cannot compensate for defi-
ciency of another nutrient. The purchaser is entitled to receive the full
guarantee for all nutrients as expressed by the manufacturer's guaranteed
p analysis.
at
EXPLANATION OF CERTAIN COLUM S
The letters NIT after a grade means that the product is, or that it con-
tains,Nitrate of Potash. The column headed "NUM" lists the laboratory number
of the particular sample. In the column headed "XS CL", an asterisk indicates
the sample did not meet the guarantee for sulfate of potash. The RV column
shows the percent of relative value found.
INSPECTION AND ANALYTICAL ALLOWANCE
The following table shows the amount of variation below the guarantee that
is allowed before a product is considered to be deficient in a plant food element.
This variation is allowed to compensate for any variations that may occur
in sampling and analysis. It does not, nor is it intended to compensate for
variation in the manufacturing process. The manufacturer should compensate
for variability in manufacturing techniques and fertilizer materials in cal-
¤ culating his formulation for a given guarantee:
Percent Guarantee in Nitrogen, Tolerance in
Phosphoric Acid or Potash Percentage Units
0-9 0.2
10-19 0.3
20-25 0.4
26-34 0.5
• 35-39 0.6
40-49 0.7
50-59 0.8
60 or more 0.9
\
Jn

 8 REGULATORY BULLETIN 211
COMPANIES REPRESENTED BY SAMPLES REPORTED IN THIS BULLETIN
Agricultural Supply Co. Campbellsville Crop Service
Industrial Drive P, O. Box 7
Hopkinsville, Kentucky 42240 Campbellsville, Kentucky 42718
Agrico Chemical C0. Caudill Seed C0.
5050 Poplar Ave. P. O. Box 348
Memphis, Tennessee 38101 Shelbyville, Kentucky 40065 V
T. R. Akridge & Son CF Industries
Fredonia, Kentucky 42411 100 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
A & L Farm Service, Inc.
Lawrenceburg, Kentucky 40342 Chevron Chemical Company
940 Hensley St.
Allensville Crop Service Richmond, California 94801
Allensville, Kentucky 42204
Christian County Supply Co.
Allied Chemical Corp. Skyline Drive
Box 206lR Hopkinsville, Kentucky 42240
Morristown, N. J. 07960 _
Cline Fertilizer Company l
Arco Chemical C0. P. O. Box 67
Box 328 Ewing, 5
Ft. Madison, Iowa 52627 Virginia 24248 4
Arkla Chemical Corp. Cominco American, Inc.
400 E. Capitol St. 818 W. Riverside Ave.
Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Spokane, Washington 99201
E. M. Bailey Distributing Commercial Solvents Corp.
1000 So. 8th Street 245 Park Ave.
Paducah, Kentucky 42001 New York, New York 10017 .
Ballard County Coop. Crafton & Duncan, Inc.
LaCenter, Kentucky 42056 1228 2nd Street
Henderson, Kentucky 42420
Big Four Feed & Implement Co. `
Scottsville, Kentucky 42164 Elanco Products C0.
740 S. Alabama St.
Black Leaf Products C0. Indianapolis, Indiana 46206
667 North State St. .
Elgin, Illinois 60120 Elkton Crop Service
Route 2
Bluegrass Plant Foods, Inc. Guthrie, Kentucky 42234 *
Cynthiana, Kentucky 41031
E-Z Flo Chemical Company
Burley Belt Fertilizer Co. 701 Koderly Drive
Box 5150 Columbus. Ohio 43228
Lexington, Kentucky 40505
Farmess Chemical Ass'n.
Burley Belt Chemical C0. P. 0. Box 87
Box 7 Harrison,
London, Kentucky 40741 Tennessee 37341 a
 

 COM ERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY JULY, 1971 - JUNE, 1972 9
COMPANIES REPRESENTED BY SAMPLES REPORTED IN THIS BULLETIN
Farmers Fertilizer Co. Howe-Hilliard Grain Co.
Smith Grove, Kentucky 42171 Mayfield, Kentucky 42066
Farmers Gin C0. Hutson Chemical Co.
P, O. Box 95 103 Maple Street
Clinton, Kentucky 42031 Murray, Kentucky 42071 ,
Farmers Supply & Produce C0. International Minerals &
Monticello, Kentucky 42633 Chemicals Corp.
Old Orchard Road
Farmland Industries, Inc. Skokie, Illinois 60078
P. O. Box 7305
Kansas City, Missouri 64116 Jon-T Chemicals, Inc.
100 S. Fifth st.
Federal Chemical Co. Brownfield,
646 Starks Building Texas 79316
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
Kaiser Agricultural Chemicals
Franklin Crop Service P. O. Box 246
Route 3 Savannah, Georgia 31402
' Franklin, Kentucky 42134
Kentucky Fertilizer Works, Inc.
Frasier Supply Co. P, O, Box 595
505 West Main St. Winchester, Kentucky 40391
Glasgow, Kentucky 42141
Kerr—McGee Farm Center
Gene's "Ag" Supply Kerr-McGee Building
Box 187 Oklahoma, Oklahoma 73102
Sturgis, Kentucky 42459
Louisville Chemical C0.
Glasgow Fertilizer C0. 601-605 Jefferson Street
Industrial Avenue Louisville, Kentucky 40202
Glasgow, Kentucky 42141
McCauley Brothers Seed Co.
W. R. Grace & Co. 111 Broadway
Agricultural Chemical Group Versailles,
100 N. Main Street Kentucky 40383
Memphis, Tennessee 38103
Marshall County Soil Imp. Ass'n.
Graves County Soil Imp. Ass'n. Box 121
Mayfield, Kentucky 42066 Benton, Kentucky 42025
Green Valley Farm Supply C0. Meacham Nitrogen Service
'* Island, Kentucky 42350 Route #3
Morganfield, Kentucky 42437
Gro—Green Chemical Co.
P. O. Box 388 Meade Farmers Supply
Shelbyville, Kentucky 40065 Brandenburg, Kentucky 40108
Hancock County Farm Supply Miles Farms Supply
Hawesville, Kentucky 42348 Route 3
Owensboro,
A Elford Hayes Kentucky
Russell Springs, Kentucky 42642 42301
·l*

 10 REGULATORY BULLETIN 211
Monsanto Company Sacramento Feed Mill
800 N, Lindbergh Boulevard Sacramento, ·
St. Louis, Missouri 63166 Kentucky 42372
Moore-Hutcheson Co. Sandusky Mill, Inc.
Morgantown, Kentucky 42261 Harrodsburg, Kentucky 40330
M-S Farm Service Schochoh Crop Service
Rt. #3 Route #5 _
Box 387 Russellville, Kentucky 42276
Henderson, Kentucky 42420 ·
O. M. Scott & Sons
Na-Churs Plant Food Company Marysville, _
421 Monroe Street Ohio 43040
Marion, Ohio 43303
Smith-Douglas Div.
North American Fertilizer Company Borden Chemicals
Preston & Bergman Box 438
Louisville, Kentucky 40217 Russellville, Kentucky 42276
Occidental Chemical Co. Smiths Grove Fertilizer Co.
Box 180 P, O. Box E W
Springfield, Ohio 45501 Smiths Grove, Kentucky 42171
Ohio Valley Fertilizer, Inc. Southeast Chemical Co.
P. O. Box 579 Box 130
Maysville, London, Kentucky 40741
Kentucky 41056
Southern States Cooperative, Inc. _
Olin Corporation Fertilizer Division .
P. O. Box 991 7th & Main Streets
Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Richmond, Virginia 23213 R
J. Petty Co. Spencer Farm Service
Route 1 Taylorsville, Kentucky 40071
Gracey, Kentucky 41143
Springfield Farmers Service
Phelps Farm Service Springfield, Kentucky 40069
424 So. Third Street
Paducah, Kentucky 42001 Stanley Crop Service
Stanley, Kentucky 42375 ‘
Prices Mill Farm Supply
Route #2 Stewart Fertilizer Service 2
Franklin, Mt. Vernon, Kentucky 40456
Kentucky 42134
Swift Agricultural Chemical Corp. A
Rich Pond Crop Service lll W. Jackson Blvd.
Route #4 Chicago, Illinois 60604
Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101
Teater & Cassity Farm Service
Royster Company Nicholasville,
P. O. Box 1940 Kentucky
Norfolk, Virginia 23501 40356 A
1

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY JULY, 1971 - JUNE, 1972 ll
Tobacco States Chemical C0. Warner Fertilizer Company
Box 479 P. O. Box 707
Lexington, Kentucky 40501 Somerset, Kentucky 42501
Todd County Grain Co. willchemco, Inc.
Elkton, Kentucky 42220 National Bank of Tulsa Bldg.
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103
USS Agri-Chemicals, Inc.
P. O. Box 1685 Williams Fertilizer Service
Atlanta, Georgia 30301 Glasgow, Kentucky 42141
Union Fertilizer Co. winchester Sales, Inc.
Mmsganfield, Box 723
Kentucky 42437 Winchester, Kentucky 40391
A
Q
N
Q~

 [2 REGULATORY BULLETIN 211
COMPUTING COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION
The listing on pages 54 thru 63 shows the average analysis and coefficient of
variation for each grade where two or more samples of a grade are reported. These
data also show the average percentage of guarantee and the coefficient of variations
for all grades reported for a company, or plant, when more than one plant is listed
and ten or more samples are reported.
The coefficient of variation is proposed as a means for reducing this to a sta-
tistic that is useful. The method for doing this will be found in textbooks on sta- —
tistics and when applied to a guarantee of 5% nitrogen is calculated as follows:
Sample Number Nitrogen Guarantee Found Sguared 1
A 5.0 5.6 31.36
B 5.0 5.5 30.25
C 5.0 5.4 29.16
D 5.0 5.7 32.49
E 5.0 5.5 30.25
F 5.0 5.8 33.64
G 5.0 5.0 25.00 '
H 5.0 6.0 36.00
I 5.0 5.5 30.25 _
J 5.0 5.3 28.09 ·
55.3 306.49
p es, average ana ysis T .
10sam1 l'=55‘3=553 ‘
Standard deviation = \ / 306.49 - ééég : \/ 0.68 = 0.275
  '
10 - l `
Coefficient of variation = 0.275 x 100 = 4.97 - 5.0%
5.53
If in this example there had been less variation or “scatter", the resulting per-
centage would have been smaller. If there had been more variation, it would have been
larger. The coefficient varies directly with the range in values of analyses.
A
Z
2

 COMM RCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY JULY, 1971 - JUNE, 1972 13
"WILD" SAMPLES
No matter how much care is exerted in a fertilizer plant, an occasional
"wild" sample may appear. Such samples are caused by unusual circumstances
such as putting the wrong fertilizer in bags labeled for another grade or _
large errors in mixing or manipulation in the factory that cannot be said to
represent usual procedure.
Computations that include such samples would only throw the coefficient
of variation as well as the average analysis completely out of line. They are
judged to be so abnormal they have not been included in these statistical deter-
minations. There were 32 such samples in the mixed fertilizer samples reported.
As a basis for excluding these samples, the following rules were followed:
l. Throw out any samples more than 120% or less than 80% in relative
value except:
a. The sample is within j 20% of the average sample value.
b. The variation of all the sample values is such that the samples
more than j 20% appear to fit a normal distribution pattern.
2. Throw out individual samples whose ratio of ingredients differs strong-
ly from the balance of samples of the grade. These may include samples:
a. Whose ratio strongly suggests an entirely different grade of fer-
tilizer.
b. Two or more of whose ingredients are high or lower by 20% or
more of the extreme values of the remaining normal samples.
E
A
E

 14 Rscumxony BULLETIN 211
TABLE l.—An¤|yses of lnspection Samples of Fertilizers (July 1971 - June 1972) _
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 per-
cent ar less indicated by asterisk.
 
AG. 5UP¤LY CO HOPKINSVILLE KY
G&AJL NUM N APA PUT X5 CL RV
6-16- 6A 30557 6.5 19.2 6.1 106 ·
6-13- 0% 31388 6.1 18.1 5.5* 101
AGRICU CHEMICAL COMPANY MEMPH1S TENN
GPAJE NUM N APA POT A5 CL RV
0-20- 0 10654 0.0 20.1 0.0 102
0-25-254 10196 0.0 21.4* 23.7* 94*
4-16- 45 30020 3.5 14.6* 5.2 * 95* `
4-16- 43 10197 4.1 16.5 4.7 LJ4
5-10-10M 10219 5.4 10.3 10.2 104 ‘
5-10-155 10269 5.1 10.2 15.4 112
5-10-155 30435 5.1 10.4 15.5 103
5-10-155 10567 5.0 10.2 15.1 101
5-1J-155 w/ME 30195 5.1 10.5 14.6* 103
5-2J-204 30153 5.1 20.0 18.9* 99
5-20-20M 30261 4.9 20.2 19.5* 99
5-JJ-204 10532 4.9 20.0 19.9 99
5-20-20M 1145d 4.6* 20.5 20.0 10U
n- 4-165 10450 6.1 6.2 17.6 101
6- 6-133 10661 6.4 6.0 1d.2 102 ·
5- 6-1dS 11112 5.9 5.8 19.0 100
6-12-124 10019 6.0 13.0 12.8 105
6-12-12M 10194 6.2 12.4 11.8 102
6-12-124 30595 5.9 12.2 12.5 101
6-24-244 10017 6.6 23.1* 21.7* 97*
6-24-24% 10262 6.1 25.0 22.6* 101
b·24-244 11050 6.1 24.1 23.6 100 . \
d- B-185 13451 8.0 8.4 1¤.1 101
1)-10-104 10118 9.6* 10.1 10.7 100
11-10-114 10147 10.0 10.1 10.7 102
1J-11-104 10268 9.3* 10.4 10.7 99
1J-10-10$ 10616 10.1 10.5 10.5 103
1)-10-114 10846 10.4 10.4 11.0 105
10-10-104 11457 10.2 10.8 11.1 105
10-10-205 30662 10.4 1u.¤ 20.0 104
10-1J-205 w/ME 10452 10.3 10.9 19.9 101
12- 4- d4 N/ME 10569 12.6 4.1 7.8 104
16- 5- 1% 10136 15.4 0.1 H.1 102
16- ¤- @4 1014v 1¤.0 ¤.d u.7 101
16- M- AW 10190 16.2 5.1 B.2 101 *
16- 1- 14 10451 14.2* ¤.9 9.0 96*
16- d- EW 10531 16.2 B.4 d.5 102
T.F. AK&l0GE K SBN FKEOUNIA KY *
G4A)& w0M M APA PU1 XS CL KV
6-27-114 29760 7.0 27.5 10.5* 100
I-11-211 11176 7.1* 30.9 21.1 100
v- J- 94 10441 10.1 10.5 9.5 11C
9-27-244 11175 9.1 26.1 21.4* 101 _
11-15-294 10441 12.1* 15.0 32.1 95
11-16-214 11174 17.a* 16.7 21.2 99
24-1u-19% 11173 21.5* 10.2 21.5 100
A E L FAJM SLKVICK INC LAdRtNC&¤0AG KY
GRA)? NUW N APA PUT KS CL KV 4
5-21-21% 11067 6.0 22.8 21.6 104
1- 6-165 11190 5.2* 6.4 17.2 97*
2

 COM RCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, 1971 - JUNE, 1972 15
TABLE I.—An¤|yses of Inspection Samples of Fertilizers (July I97I - June I972)
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 per-
cent ar less indicated by asterisk.
 
A L L PARK SERVICE INC LAwRENCEBORG KY
GQAD; NUW N APA PUT XS CL KV
13-13-131 31389 11.0* 13.8 14.4 94*
14-14-14A 31036 13.7* 14.0* 17.7 98
22- 9- 9% 31056 21.9 10.0 9.5 101
ALLENSVILLE CROP SERVICE ALLENSVILLE KY.
A GRAJE NUW N APA PUT KS LL RV
0-25-25% 50622 0.0 27.0 20.1 107
5-23-234 w/WE 30017 5.6 27.5 20.9* 107
6-24-24% 30821 6.4 24.9 23.¤ 10:
12-12-12% 30330 11.1* 11.5* 12.9 90*
12-12-124 30352 10.5* 12.0 13.2 95*
AFC0 CHEWICAL C0 FORT MADISON ICMA
CKA3; NUM N APA POT X5 CL KV
6-24-24M 30443 7.1 24.5 26.7 10u
6-24-24% 30556 7.0 24.2 24.0 104
12-12-12% 30442 12.0 12.C 12.a 101
ARKLA CHEMICAL CGRP. LITTLE KUCK APK.
GQAOL NUM N APA PUT K5 CL KV
¤’1d‘}O$ 3147a 6.2 17./ 34.0* 98
—— 6-24-24*4 30284 6.d 24.9 24.2 105
¤-24-243 30555 6.6 26.6 23.3* 107
7-20-2am 31479 6.7 29.1 27.6 99
14-14-14% 30554 13.7 16.6 14.9 106
[ M dAILEY 0ISTR1¤UTlMG Cu uANOANA KY
GRAOL NUM N APA POI X5 CL KV
ZJ- 6- A4 312H4 21.a o.7* 4.5* 99
_ 20- H- ::4 31970 20.2 7.5* d.o 100
E M nAILEY DI5IKId0T1Nu C0 MAYPIELD KY
GKAIJE NLIM N APA PUT K; CL KV
20- 3- nM 31483 18.7* 10.3 9.3 102
I 20-10-107 31253 19.6 10.3 7.5* 97*
bALLAR0 CU0lTY CIUP LA CENTER KY.
GQAJE NUM N APA PUT K5 CL RV
5-21-214 31J75 d.2 20.4* 19.9* 104
H10 Fauw PLEU L IMPLEMENT CU SCUTISVILLE KY
GQ AOI; N·.Jr4 N APA POT KS CL KV
0-30-19% JIJ34 0.0 30.2 20.5 101
' 5-19-1o% 31737 6.0 19.4 20.0 107
6-12-134 31035 6.9 11.d 17.9 104
' 17-17-17% 31036 16.9 12.5* 21.3 95*
ULACK LEAF PKJJUCIS CU ELGIN ILL
· G~A3& NJA N APA PCI AS CL KV
7} I2- o- 65 A/*5 31494 12.2 6.1 6.6 103
uLOEJRAS$ PLANT F0u0j. INC. CYNTHIAJA KY.
69AJc NUM N APA POT A3 CL KV
J- 0*005 30505 0.0 0.0 59.6 99
0-20-20* 29961 0.0 16.0* 19.0* u5*
0-20-20% 30325 0.0 20.5 17.7* 95
J-20-BJ4 30692 0.0 20.9 29.a 102
· 2- 5- *15 50691 3.0 9.:: 10.} 112
4-16- 45 JUJLJ 4.7 13.2* 4.2 93*
A_ 5-10-153 29556 3.0 10.7 17.2 * 125
5-10-155 30556 5.5 9.9 15.u 102
5-1J-155 31242 4.9 9.9 15.4 99

 16 REGULATORY BULLETIN 211
TABLE `|.—An¤|yses of Inspection Samples of Fertilizers (July 1971 - June 1972)
Analyses deficient more than tolerance cnd relative values of 97 per-
cent or less indicated by asterisk.
 
uLUE5%ASS PLANT FOODS. INL. CYNTHIANA KY.
GQAQE NUM N APA PUT X> ZL KV
5-10-153 J1J92 5.1 9.8 15.6 1U1
5-13-153 5142J 5.4 8.4* 14.7 95*
5-23-20% 299oz 5.2 15.9* 17.4* 94*
$-2J-ZJW JdJZb 5.1 18.7* 23.5 LJE
5-20-LJ4 juhéd 6.u 22.7 20.5 11L `
5-27-14M ju69O 5.0 27.3 16.9 1JL
6- 5-LHS }ub55 5.9 5.3 10.1* 96*
6-12-IZW LQVGJ 5.9 12.J 13.b 102
5-12-1&4 2916} 5.9 10.6* 7.5* 5o*
n—12-IZW 50J27 6.1 15.0 1Z.Z LJ4
6-1d-165 30689 5.4* 12.2 17.1* 9o*
6-10-155 30304 7.5* 8.o* 15.2 9}*
d-10-153 jOb57 7.8 8.3* 15.5 9}*
5-10-155 31jZO 5.9* 8.0* 17.0 u¤*
$-1)-155 51521 5.9* 9.1* 17.4 90*
%-10-155 31421 13.0 1d.o 12.:* * 116 `
1J·10-104 ZQHQ4 IU.1 10.7 6.J* 79
IJ-10-10% jO&1d 10.1 11.¤ ¤.d# 1u4
1J·1J-104 51243 9.d* 9.9 9.0* 95*
1.2-1.)-10*4 Buzz 9.4¤ 7.3* 7.4¤ 14*
1J·ZO·ZO5 JV695 1J.l 20.o 19.7 101
12-11-11% 51425 11.2* 10.0* 10.2* 91* ‘.
12-12-12N 31245 1d.} 1Z.d lj.7 Lub
15-16-1¤W J1d44 14.4* 1J.u* 17.U 90* I
zz- .J—z.M Juan? 2z.Z u.U ZO.4 101
¤LUEuKA>S PLANY POGh$. INC. JANVILLE KY. ‘
GRA)E NUM N AHA PUT K5 CL KV
J·10·5U% $u402 0.0 9.d 23.5* ¤7*
J·¢.J- u j1)7dJ 1).0 1:3.9* 1).0 9*;* `
9-iU-204 30052 J.U 14.0* ¢O.b b1*
O-ZJ-2J% $0035 3.3 16.9* 17.4* 92* ,
4-zJ-ZJA }OJ84 J.J 16.u* 4d.1 96*
0-2J-LJ4 JJOBS J.U 19.5* 14.5* 90*
J-Z0- 2J’\ Juddb J.J 1¤.:s* 17.£·>‘ :54*
J-ZJ-Z)4 jO27h 0.0 21.4 1¤.j* 1J1
J·2J·204 idvdj J.0 19.1* 19.Z* 96*
J-du-dow JJA54 3.J 15.5* 1d.b* 93*
)·Z5-Z¤4 3J1j3 0.0 2&.7* 23.9* 9A*
J-15-254 J1ZUd 4.U 2J.9* 15.c* 77*
4-1d- cd jU449 4.J 1Z.L 0.d¢ 95*
4—Ll- 54 jJ57J 5.7 9.5* 1J.} 1J5 ‘
»—1£- 8% jJ$J5 b.H Zu.u 5.3* 15é
4-1n- 43 Ju1JJ 4.5 11.d·> 4.3 :10*
5-1J-105 &9i9$ 5.5 7.5* 1}.4* 35*
¤-1u·155 }u1;1 5.1 9.9 14.7 LJJ
2-1U-13J jqiwd 5.5 1J.2 14.4* 1J! I
5-10-15A 30272 5.2 9.5* 14.7 Qs
5-IJ-lab iJZl$ 5.z v.b* 14.0* 47*
G-1J-15; 304)1 5.} 10.4 14.7 * 103
‘3-1J-15> 5040} 5.Z 9.4* 14.}+ 17*
$-14-153 3d477 4.7* 9.3* 14.b* 94*
5-1.}-1*:5 JO4•7d 5.} 12.9 14.7 * 119 A
0-1J-155 JO4d4 5.H 8.9 14.9 * 1J4
>-1)-103 ju7J3 4.1* ¤.9# 15.6 91*
5-1)-15é Jdicé 5.6 10.5 13.6* 144
5-1J-1vj iuélj 5.u 7.6* 9.¤# * ¤J*
5-1)-1>j $1J¤1 4.8 9.9 14.5* 97*

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY JULY, 1971 · JUNE, 1972 17
TABLE '|.—An¤|yses of Inspection Samples of Fertilizers (July 1971 — June 1972)
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 per-
cent or less indicated by asterisk.
BLUEGRASS PLANT FOODS, INC. DANVILLE KY.
GRADE NUM N APA POT XS CL RV
5-10-155 31209 5.0 10.0 15.0 99
5-10-153 31501 5.2 10.3 12.3* 96*
5-10-155 31515 8.2 14.0 14.1* 113
5—20-23M 29598 4.0* 17.3* 18.4* 87*
5-20-20% 29753 3.1* A1.0 20.0 97*
5-20-20M 30067 5.8 18.6* 20.b 1uO
5-2J-ZOM 50uBB 5.4 16.3* 10.b* 93*
5-20-ZOM 50154 5.1 18.4* 20.4 96*
' 5-20-20% BOZG1 $.3 16.7* 20.1 95
5—ZD·20“ 30454 5.2 19.4* 19.0* 98
5-20-20% 30474 4.8 19.1* 19.9 96*
5-20-20% 3u#75 5.0 18.4* 20.1 96*
5-20-20% 30479 4.b 20.0 18.2* 97*
5-Z0-20% 30981 4.8 20.1 19.2* 99
5-20-20% Jo499 5.0 ZJ.) 21.¤ 103
5-Z0-ZJW 30589 4.7* 18.9* 19.4* 95*
5-20-20* 30696 4.9 19.0* 20.3 97*
5·2U·2J* 3J70& 5.6 20.5 17.9* 101
5-20-AGM 50758 5.2 19.9 18.2* 98
5-20-20* JUBBZ 5.7 17.0* 1¤.6* 92*
5-2u-ZUW 30940 5.1 21.5 17.G* 100
5-20-2JW 31082 4.9 22.5 13.5* 97*
5-2U-20* 51514 2.8* 1:.J* 21.5 61*
5- 6-185 51191 6.4 b.5 1¤.6* 1J1
6- 6-183 51195 5.5* 5.9 17.4* 95*
‘ 5- 6-1%5 51197 7.5 5.2 1b.5* 115
6-12-124 BOJG9 5.8 11.4* 9.0* 91*
_ ¤-12-18W 5OJ9O G.! 1£.6 10.1* 99
' 0-12-12% 30391 5.1 12.5 10.0* 98
6-12-12* 30092 0.2 13.1 10.5* 102
5·12-1ZW 50152 5.E 13.8* 14.5 95*
o-12-1d4 50148 5.b* o.9* 10.0* d3*
6-1d-12* 5U&74 5.9 1J.d* 11.5* 94*
G-ld-124 3J#JJ 5.9 11.4* 11.5* 90*
0-12-124 33457 5.8 11.}* 11.)* 95*
5-1Z-1Z* 5J&7b 6.0 10.5* 11.4* 94*
5-12-12% 504bB 6.0 11.Z* 11.7 9c*
~—1Z-12* 3u496 5.9 11.5* 12.5 99
V A-12-1i* $0554 5.7* 11.9 1J.J 1Ju
b~i&·1&’ $U7b7 5.6* 11.5* 1d.7 97*
_ 0-12-12% 3J77? 5.5 11.4* 12.5 97*
o-12-124 ;OI51 $.5* 11.u* 12.4 Gov
:»-12-1.2* 307¤3 5.1* 1·).¤* 1z.o aw
5-12-l2" 5UJ7k 6.7 11.9 11.é 1J}
u·12—1d$ 30447 5.2* 10.2* zv.4 1~¢
é- 3-153 31193 9.o o.4 7.4¤ 9J*
3-10-15) 31195 7.9 0.a 15.2 * 19
. 1U·1C-IQ4 £w7¤4 3.c* 11.0 11.6 104
` 1U-1J-104 29Hbb 13.4 12.1 ¤.Z* 106
1J·1Q·1J* JOJ2# 10.: 1J.3 1J.é 133
, 13-1U-10% $0247 9.0* 9.7* 9.7 93*
13-1U—10W BJZSO 9.5 1u.1 1u.h lJ0
1J-10-104 3J&75 9.7* 10.; 10.5 LJJ
1J—1J-1J“ 3u4¢% 10.7 11.2 6.}* 1o~
1¤.}·1)·1J'4 ZJMHZ 9.6* 9.b* 9.9 —ib*
1)-13-134 5udA1 1).3 1J.Z 10.5 1J1
1u-10-10% 50975 6.9* lu.7 10.9 fb

 18 REGULATORY BULLETIN 211
TABLE 'l.-—An¤|yses of Inspection Samples of Fertilizers (July 1971 - June 1972)
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 per-
cent ar less indicated by asterisk.
BLOEuPA>S PLANT FOODS. IWC. DANVILLC KY.
` GRADE NUM N APA PUT KS CL RV
10-10-10% 51192 12.4 12.3 6.9* 114
10-10-10% 31210 7.3* 7.9* 15.4 88*
10-10-10% 31441 9.9 10.9 13.5 10E
10-10-10% 51442 12.] 13.6 10.5 126
10-10-155 51194 7.1* 6.9* 19.6 84*
12-12-12% 31294 10.0* 12.0 1j.6 94*
13- 7-24% j0975 12.3* 9.0 27.o 100
10-16-16% 30446 14.d* 15.7 14.2* 100
15-16-16% 31540 15.4* 15.5* 13.}* 94*
25- 0-1)% 30976 21.3* 0.0 21.5 95*
dL0£0RAS$ PLANT FHUOS 1NC PAQIS Ki
GRADE NU% N APA PUT K3 CL RV _
5-10-155 30674 5.7 8.0* 13.1* 92*
5-12-1*:3 50670 6.2 12.0 1¤.4* -1:*
ri- 6-195 .10673 7.9 (:.0 15.1 99
9-1)-15; 50672 7.h* 10.0 15.8 J9
1)-10-10% 30671 9.0* 7.5* 11.2 92*
HUALEY JELT FERTILILEQ C0. LEXINGTON KY.
blA)E NUW N APA POT Xb CL RV
0-20-20% 50060 0.0 20.4 17.9* 15
4-16- 45 30JhL 4.1 15.2* 4.} 99
»-1H- 43 30217 4.9 15.4* 5.1 105
5-10-10% :0771 5.5 10.0 7.9* 99
5-10-153 30054 5.2 9.9 15.2 101
5-10-155 30175 5.: 9.6* 15.) 101
5*.1)*155 5017% 4.9 9.d 15.0 9d
5-10-153 3066) 5.5 10.7 15.2 106
5-10-153 51185 5.1 10.0 15.2 101
5-1)-15) $1415 4.7* 9.)* 14.5* 04*
5-20-20* 24710 5.5 1%.2* 19.)* 95* ·_
5-20-Z)4 30)67 5.0 19.5* 19.4* 97*
5-2)-20“ $0179 6.0 19.)* 1¤.9* 100
5-20-26% )~Q)b‘l5 4.9 19.El 20.4 1JO I
a- 4-1%> 11225 5.5* 6.4 16.9* 95*
·»— ’»-1·\5 )122b 5.6* ¤.2 10.9-* 96*
6- 5-1*> )1227 5.5* 6.5 17.4* 9b
/;··12·12l·\ 501*1** 5.9 11.2* 11.8 96*
5-12-121 }0¤52 u.2 11.9 12.9 10)
5-L?-1n5 10772 5.9 12.1 1¤.2 100
a-12-15a A/%E 10177 6.1 11.b* ic.0 99 '
u-12-1w> w/%F 10410 5.J 12.1 17.4* 99 I
6-1)-155 JJJU2 5.5 $.9 14.4* 101
*-1)-15) 50049 7.9 9.3* 15.5 Ob
9-1)-15s 10u%~ B.: 9.) 15.7 102
1)-1)-10% 29026 1.9 9.% 10.) 99
1)-11-10% 29¤2/ 10.0 7.5* 10.0 41
1)-1)-10% 29¤d4 ).5* 10.0 7.9 9d
1)-1)-114 2w709 9.7 10.7 10.5 101
.0-1)-1)% 29939 9.6* 10.0 11.) 100
1.}*1)*1.}* .500hi 10.1 1.).4 9.6* 1.)1
1)-1)-10% 50176 9.6* 10.1 9.4* 47* l
1)-10-10% :01H) 9.7 1).0 1).2 19
1)-10-10% 50404 9.4* 9.7 9.) 96*
10-1)-10% $0051 1).4 7.9* 10.7 16* ‘
1)-16-1.4 j0776 1).1 9.%* 1.7* 96*
1)-1)-104 51415 9.7 10.1 9.0* 97*
1.1-1)-13% 51*.9*; 9.5= #.9 9.a¤= 40*

 COWM RCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY JULY, 1971 - JUNE, 1972 19
TABLE l.—Anu|yses of Inspection Sumples of Fertilizers (July 197] — June l972)
Analyses deficient more than tolerance cmd relative values of 97 per-
. cent or less indicated by asterisk.
 
BURLEY BELT FERTILIZEH CJ. LEXINGTUN KY.
GQADE NUM N APA POT X3 CL RV
1)-lJ—2d$ $l~L4 9.5* 9.0* L9.b * 93*
12-ll-12% 29938 lZ.U l1.4* 12.2 98
IZ-id-LZW JULBI 12.3 12.1 12.7 LJZ
12-LZ-LEM BOLB9 1Z.U LL.9 14.L IJU
l2·ll-IZW 30405 ll.7 LZ.0 ll.8 Wn
1}-LO-[4% jooéb l4.l 10.6 14.%* LJZ
28-25- 0 29bdl 25.1* 3e.l 0.0 100
‘ BURLEY BELT CHEMICAL C]. LONDON KY. _
GRADE NUM N APA POT KS CL RV
0*20-20% 29932 0.0 23.0 20.0 LOO
J-ZJ—2OW 3022Z 0.0 ZO.Z l9.1* 99
u·Z0-2uM 50¤3b 0.0 20.3 l9.3* lJO
O-20-ZOW JOIZL 0.0 l9.7 l9.l* 97*
J-Z0-Z0? BLQJ4 0.0 l9.d Z0.} 100
0-23-20% A/ME 29934 0.0 Z0.£ 17.5* 9b*
3- ¤~ 0W 29930 3.5 9.1 7.3 lub
5- 9- 6% 3Q6o7 $.0 7.8* 6.0 95*
V . 3- 9- 5W JO8bd 3.4 9.0 7.4 107
A- ’—1- {M 50803 2.:1 7.0* 0.0 a(>*
4-1;- HW 29953 3.9 ll.3* 9.2 99
4-lz- AM $0158 4.1 11.2* 8.1 97*
#—lZ- AM 30o35 4.Z lL.é* 8.7 [Ju
4-I2- BW 30d>5 3.9 10.7* d.¤ 95*
4-lb- 45 30151 7.1 lJ.b* 7.8 117
5-LJ- 5W JU335 5.0 IO.! ¤.3 L09
5-lJ- 54 307l9 5.7 13.9 L2.0 127
5-lJ— 5% 3l2bd 7.7 1u.Q ll.} IMO
% 5-LJ-1JW é993L 4.¤* 6.7* 9.0 91*
5-IJ-IOW 3Go4O 4.d lO.4 10.0 LJU
5-IU-lJ% 3ll69 4.7 9.u* 9.7 93*
5-LJ-R04 51452 4.0* 5.8* LO.; #2*
5-1)-iii ZQQHB 5.1 9.9 lb.O IJO
5-LJ-155 AQQZ7 5.2 Lu.J l4.9 lOl
5-LJ-153 JQQ35 ~.9 9.9 l5.l 99
5-LQ-LGS ZQUQQ 5.1 lJ.1 K5.} lu2
5-ld-L9; 30239 5.1 9.5* l4.¤ 97*
5-IJ-LES 50537 5.7 lG.5 14.5* IV5
5-LJ-{Sn BJISG 5.2 1.9 14.7 LJJ
2-LQ-15i 3L425 4.9 lJ.O l5.¤ 99
5-10-l55 )i455 #.7* 1.d 15.4 iH
$-ZJ-20* 29623 5.d 1%.1* ;l.l 47*
>—i)-AU4 Z"ib4Q 4.%* 10.*7* 20.3 95*
5-2J—&dW 274ll 6.6* 10.%* Zu.5 91*
5-20-ZJ“ £¤%%4 #.8 L9.u¤ &O.Z 47*
U-BJ-AJW 19926 4.7* 19.}* 19.9 v7*
2-Zu-AU4 Zv¥}7 4.v 19.9 19.9 99
$—L..-4.;* 3¤J.>~2J 5.1 1¤.L`> 40.;. #1.*
5—Z)—EJ’ 50257 5.J L7.9* 21.J 90*
1-2.)-204 3.145-3 5..; l#3..¢* LG.0 46*
$—£)—QJW 50639 5.i k8.b* 2b.¢ 9I*
3-ZJ-2)* AUTZJ 4.9 L¤.4* ZU.2 90*
3-Z0-ZJW 3u%Qj 4.¤* 19.u* zu.5 15*
5—2J—;uw jQd54 4.4* 2u.J 19.9 98
5-2.)-ZO'4 3l.)7¤ ~.9 1J.'i·¥‘ 1%.7 90*
5-12-1;% ¢993) 5.9 LZ.L 1Z.o LOI
h-1J·l?W 5U22l 5.b LL.l* ld.2 9o*
_ 6-12-LZ* 3¢Z3% 5.l ll.9 l¢.¤ lul

 20 REGULATORY BULLETIN 211
TABLE l.—An¤|yses of Inspection Samples of Fertilizers (July 197} - June 1972)
Analyses deficient more than tolerance und relative values of 97 per-
cent 0r less indicated by asterisk.
BURLEY BELT CHEMICAL CU. LUNUUN KY.
GYADE NOW N APA PUT XS CL RV .
b-ll-LZM 3125u 5.4* ll.l* Ll.6* 92*
6-12-12% 5lZb6 6.4 Ll.5* 11.5* 99
H-L£·l85 W/ME £99b7 5.7 ll.4* 18.4 97*
0-l2-LBS H/%E JOIJO 6.0 1L-O 18.2 IOO
9-10-l5S 29929 8.9 10.0 lQ.4* * 95
LJ-lu-LOW £9b45 9.7 10.2 Lu.} lJ0
lJ—lJ-LOW 29779 9.9 lJ.2 11.1 102
LJ-10-10% 29BlZ 9.5* 10.5 11.8 ldl l \
lJ—lO-[OM l996B 9.9 lU.l 9.6* 99
LO-lu-lU4 30094 lO.5 9.I* 9.4* 100
XJ-LU-LOW 50638 lO.J 9.4* 9.9 98
[O-LJ-1J% 3085J 9.6* 10.u 9.6* 97*
1J-lO·LO% 3l4£4 LO.u 10.u 9.1* VB
Lu—l0-[04 $1435 9.8 1J.l 9.b* 95
10-Z0-ZOM 29778 9.7 21.1 19.9 ldl
12-12-12% 29928 l2.U l2.2 12.2 LOL
LZ-lL—lZ4 50220 10.9* 12.0 LL.B 95*
LZ-l2-l£4 30470 ll.5* 1l.O 12.0 97*
LZ-12-12% 5Jb41 ll.4* 12.4 ld.3 99
l2-LZ-IZM 30842 Ll.8 L2.U ll.? 99
ld-l2-lZ4 Jl257 ll.3* l2.4 l1.7* 98
l2—1Z-I2! 31267 l0.6* ll.9 lL.4* 96*
L5-L5-15% 30469 L4.2* L5.} [5.0 QB
L5-15-l5W 3070l 14.3 15.5 lS.l LOO
bUMLEY $:LT CHEMICAL CJ FERGUSON KY
G¤Ant NUM N APA PUT XS CL KV
O-ZO—ZJM ZQBLB 0.0 l9.#* 20.H 99
3-l0-{OW 30394 0.0 2u.J 19.7 99
0-ZJ-20% 30557 0.0 19.Z* 18.4* 95*
5-[0-155 2¤944 5.0 9.4* 14.0* 97*
5-L3-lb: 31464 4.4* 9.3* 14.3* 92*
5-&)·2J“ 29592 5.4 l5.Z* 19.3* 96*
5-JO-20% 50044 4.9 l6.3* 19.9 95*
5-23-ZOW 30593 5.0 18.4* l9.9 90*
5-ZO-ZO4 305db 5.2 19.A* L8.7* 77* '
u-LA-[24 2995d 5.7 LL.9 12.1 JB
0-l&—lz4 50:91 6.0 il.7 11.5* QB
H-L2-12% 30950 5.8 lU.H* l3.0 9u*
¤-L2-14* JL463 5.L* L1.}* 12.7 94*
u-L2-IZW §14¤5 5.5* ll.3¤ 12.0 94*
¤—L2-LH; A/ME saga} 5.9 ll.5* 17.9 97*
lu-10-lQW 29565 0.4* 9.9 lO.6 98
LO·lJ—lOW }OJ45 9.H 9.5* lo.} 78
lu·1J-LOW 305Ud 9.u* 9.7* 9.o* 90*
l3·lu—lJ* )lZlL 9.6* 1.5* 11.0 95
10-lO·lJW jl¤5b 9.4* 9.b 10.2 97*
LU·LJ-IOW Jlwbi 10.3 9.5 10.5 LOU
l)-JO-ZD* 30392 9.5* 2u.Z 19.7 98
13—l5-l5W 2994) 14.u* Lj.J* lb.6 93#
La-l5-15* 3l2l2 14.7 L4.l* 15.L 97*
CAMVOELLSVILLE CROP SkPVlCE CAMPBCLLSVILLKY. '
GFAOE NUM N APA POT XS CL RV
b-26-45% 50905 5.5* Z1.7* 32.L 9#*
o·d6-25* 3l5}H 6.4 22.2* £9.d 9b*
LO- i-LGS 3l53Y 11.5 9.7 14.b * luh
lJ—lJ·l$3 30QbO LO.} lO.l 15.5 lOl
10-Ju-204 BOZJL 5.8* Z5.7* 27.0 94*

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY JULY, 1971 - JUNE, 1972 21
TABLE I.-—An¤lyses of Inspection Samples of Fertilizers (July 'l97I - June 1972)
Analyses deficient more than tolerance and relative values of 97 per-
cent 0r less indicated by asterisk.
 
CAMP¤ELL5VILLE CRUP SERVICE CAMPULLLSVILLKY.
GDADL NUM N APA POT AS CL KV
11- 9-143 30904 11.4 9.0 14.0 100
12-10- B4 30901 13.0 14.7* 9.2 101
17-17-174 30902 10.9* 15.4* 21.4 97*
17-17-17% 30903 17.7 10.4* 19.3 99
17-17-17% 31j30 18.2 15.1* 10.0 97*
20-10-10% $1339 21.2 10.3 10.0 103
CAUDILL SEED CJ jHcLdYV1LLE KY
GPAD: NUM N APA PDT X5 CL RV
9- 9- 9% 31411 11.2 9.2* 0.2* 101
10-10-105 30270 5.1* 9.1* 19.4 * 94*
11-29-19% 30995 11.1* 27.9* 22.7 9¤
15- d-12M A/ME 50990 12.9* 14.3 11.9 108
15-15-156 30271 14.9 15.0 15.5 100
19-11-154 51913 20.J 10.0* 15.1 131
CF 1NDOSTH1ES INC CHIQAGU 1LL.
GWA); NJH N APA PUT KS CL RV
0-40- J 29571 0.0 4u.9 0.0 1J2
CH“V¤0N CHEW1CAL CU-JLIM0 01V KICHWJNU CAL.
GkAJr NUM N APA PDT A; CL RV
1J-2J-LJG 40205 10.9 20.s 19.2* 10:
12- a- ui $1354 12.4 0.1 0.7 104
10-10-1u4 29964 10.1 10.9 15.5 103
10-1¤-Ian 29955 10.1 10.2 10.) 101
10-10-Lai 50204 10.5 10.0 1¤.¤ 102
10-10-104 $0280 15.3 10.0 10.0 102
20-10-10f 30295 20.n 10.5 10.4 104
22- 4- 4A 50051 22.5 4.4 4.1 102
LHAISYIAN C1UiIY >UPPLY C0. HOVKINBVILLE KY.
G