Regulatory Series, Bulletin No. 14 July, 1937
Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station i I {
j UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY  
* .._. 1
I
. I
By J. D. TURNER, H. D. SPEARS, W. G. TERRELL and l
l L. V. AMBURGEY
CONTENTS I p
Standards ,,,,.. , ..,.., . ,.,.....,,_,...... . ......... 2 Minerals ................,............................. 16  
1iO}J(lSil’(l,llO1`l requirements ............ 4 Special anzllyticill {lata ................ 17 Q
Yellow tag; feeds ____._.__,,_____ _, .,____,,_, ,. G Dog feeds ................. .. ....................... 18 ,
llalanced ration __,,______.._____,,__,._....,. 7 Analyses of dor: feeds .................. 20 5
livaluziting feeds ,,.....,_.............,,..._ 10 Summary of results of in- Y
g llominy feeds _,,..,,,,__,,,__,,.____,......___... 15 spection and analysis, 1936 ........ 31 ' .
. {
t As a result of thc drouth and with the return to more I
  normal economic conditions, there was marked increase in the I
volume of commercial feeds sold in Kentucky during 1936. It is
estimated that approximately 350,000 tons were consumed, an
· increase over 1935 consumption of more than 125,000 tons, and
  at an estimated retail cost to the consumer of more than
S $15,000,000 The sum paid hy Kentucky feeders for commercial
1 leeds, not including whole grains and hays, compared with the
ll. S. Department of Agriculture valuation of livestock in Ken-
tucky for 1936, equals 10.3 percent of the total value of livestock
_, in the State, including poultry.
Tllo heavy demand and high price of feeds created Hlllilll I
unscrupulous competition in the business among certain manu- .  
_ taeturers. Those who adultcratcd and mishrandcd feeds were   I
re