xt7dz02z689g https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7dz02z689g/data/mets.xml University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate Kentucky University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate 1971-12-20  minutes 2004ua061 English   Property rights reside with the University of Kentucky. The University of Kentucky holds the copyright for materials created in the course of business by University of Kentucky employees. Copyright for all other materials has not been assigned to the University of Kentucky. For information about permission to reproduce or publish, please contact the Special Collections Research Center. University of Kentucky. University Senate (Faculty Senate) records Minutes (Records) Universities and colleges -- Faculty University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, December 20, 1971 text University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, December 20, 1971 1971 1971-12-20 2020 true xt7dz02z689g section xt7dz02z689g 'Vrkpawrn-g—u- xn-ch-vtfslav'; my.» mumglgfl- . , , ,~ -

   
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
    
     
   

Minutes of the University Senate, December 13, 1971 - cont

[ Fall, 1972 is approximately March I, 1972. He also pointed out that all

' but about 1500 students had already registered for the 1972 spring semester;
3% that in order to give academic areas time to review and determine what their
4”, requirements are going to be he did not see how it could possibly be im—
plemented before the 1972 Fall Semester.

5

i
5

Motion was made and seconded to adjourn. Motion was then made and
seconded for a roll call vote. The motion for a roll call vote was '
disapproved.

Motion was made for a quorum call. It was determined that a quorum was
present.

The Chairman then ruled that the motion to adjourn be voted on. The Senate
approved that motion.

\ Adjournment occurred at 5:30 p.m.

? Elbert W. Ockerman
l Secretary

 

MINUTES OF THE CALLED MEETING OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, DECEMBER 20, 1971 j Vi‘fl

The University Senate met in called session at 4:00 p.m., Monday,
December 20, 1971, in the Court Room of the Law Building. Chairman Rovin
presided. Members absent: Staley F. Adams*, Arnold D. Albright, Daniel
S. Arnold*, Ronald Atwood, James R. Barclay, Charles E. Barnhart, Wendell E.
Berry, Harmon Bickley, Harry M. Bohannan, Garnett L. Bradford*, Eugene B.
Bradley, Betty J. Brannan*, C. Frank Buck, Collins W. Burnett*, Ralph S.
Carpenter*, S. K. Chan*, Carl B. Cone*, Glenwood L. Creech, George W.
Denemark, Loretta Denman*, James H. Eley, Paul T. Ferrellfi Paul G. Forand,
Lawrence Forgy, Jr., Stuart Forth*, Donald T. Frazier*, George H. Gadbois*,
‘ Jess L. Gardner*, Richard E. Gift*, Brenda J. Hamer, Joseph Hamburg, Virgil W. ‘fl
Hays*, James W. Herron*, Donald L. Hochstrasser*, Alfred S. L. Hu, Kate T. ' fl
Irvine*, Raymon D. Johnson*, William S. Jordan, Jr.*, Fred E. Justus*, 3W
Irving F. Kanner*, Don Kirkendall*, Stuart M. Klein, James A. Knoblett, Lois W.
Langhorst*, Bruce E. Langlois, Sara H. Leech, Donald C. Leigh*, Kathy Liedtke,
Donald L. Madden, Paul Mandelstam*, Leslie L. Martin*, George E. Mitchell*,
James T. Moore, Thomas P. Mullaney, Jacqueline A. Noonan*, Paul Obersfii Curtis
Phipps, Paul M. Pinney*, Nicholas J. Pisacano, Leonard A. Ravitz*, E. Douglas
Rees, Herbert G. Reid*, Donald A. Ringe, Virginia Rogers, John Scarborough,*
Donald S. Shannon*, D. Milton Shuffett*, John B. Stephenson*, Leonard P.
Stoltz*, W. Paul Street*, Thomas B. Stroup, Charles G. Talbert*, Norman L.
Taylor, Nancy K. Totten, H. Mac Vandiviere*, Kenneth E. Vanlandingham, John A.
Via*, John N. Walker, M. Stanley Wall, Charles A. Walton, Cynthia Watts,
Ronald D. Weddle*, David R. Wekstein*, Paul K. Whitaker*, William R. Willard,

Constance P. Wilson*, and Miroslava B. Winer*.

 

 

 

*Absence explained

  

 

3278 MINUTES OF THE CALLED MEETING OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, DECEMBER 20, 1971

The Chairman thanked the Recording Secretary for circulating the
minutes of the regular meeting of December 13, 1971 so that they would
be in the hands of the Senators by this meeting. These minutes were approved
as circulated.

The Chairman referred the Senators to the summary sheet which had
been handed to them as they entered the meeting which contained the action
taken at the December 13th meeting, namely, amendment of the General
Studies Component as follows:

”. The General Studies Component in every baccalaureate degree
program shall consist of five (5) areas of study chosen by the student
from the following eight (8) areas:

(1) through (8) Area listings”

He stated that the following sentence which was a part of that amendment,
remained to be acted on by the Senate:

"The Rules shall be waived only to the extent that they are
inconsistent with certification or accreditation requirements."

Following discussion from the floor, Dr. Daniel Reedy presented the following
amendment to the waiver amendment being considered:

”The Rules shall be waived only to the extent that they are
inconsistent with certification, accreditation, or college
requirements for degrees."

This motion was seconded.

Following extensive discussion of the amendment, call for the question was
made and approved. The Senate then voted on the amendment as presented
by Dr. Reedy, and disapproved it by a hand count of 59 to 45.

Dr. John Rea then proposed an amendment to prefix the following sen-
tence to the amendment on the floor:

A student whose major falls in one of the eight (8) General Studies
areas may not use that area to fulfill the General Studies requirements.

This amendment was seconded. At this point the Parliamentarian raised the
question of his intended meaning of the word "requirements” in his motion;
that the main motion on the floor concerned accreditation requirements. On
determination that Dr. Rea's amendment was not pertinent to accreditation
requirements, he ruled the motion out of order.

Dr. McEllistrem presented the following amendment which was seconded:

The Rules shall be waived if they are inconsistent with certification
or accreditation requirements.

Following some further discussion, call for the question was made and
approved. The Senate then voted to approve Dr. McEllistrem's amendment to
the amendment under consideration.

   
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
 
  
   
     

<29

.——\. —— A—-——“,

_ .313 _
.Ew "

 “flaw-haw 1" arm “Wan my.» . x

       
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
 
   

MINUTES OF THE CALLED MEETING OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, DECEMBER 20, 1971 3279

The Senate returned to discussion of the original amendment as amended.
A Suggestion was made that the word "The" be changed to "These” in the amendment
just passed and the Senators agreed to this editorial change.

Call for the question was made and approved and the Senate approved the
amendment as amended by a hand count of 60 to 53. The amendment, as amended,
and approved, reads:

These Rules shall be waived if they are inconsistent with certification
or accreditation requirements.

The total action taken by the University Senate at its meetings of December 13 ,7
and December 20, 1971 to be incorporated into the Rules 9f_the University Senate ,1 .
at its next updating, will read as follows: "

requirements as approved by the University Senate, except that
curriculum substitutions may be made by the college affected if not
inconsistent with these Rules. Curriculum requirements must include,
in addition to specified credits, a specified grade point average which
shall in no case be less than 2.0.

fl
«7"sz "To be eligible for any degree, a student must have completed the
i
l
l
V

or components:

(I) General Studies .
(2) Pre—major or Pre—professional :1‘jif
(3) Major or Professional ' .

{ ”Every baccalaureate degree program shall include four divisions
1
(4) Free Electives

[ ”Two semesters of English Composition (6 credits) are required

€55 of all students unless they can demonstrate proficiency. The above
p
H

 

SJ. requirement will be reduced to three (3) credits for University students
who receive a grade of B or above in English 105, Advanced Freshman
Composition. (See patterns available in catalog). Full—time students
must enroll in English Composition each semester they are in attendance
until the requirement is satisfied. Postponement of this requirement
or withdrawal from English Composition is rarely permissible and must
be approved by the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences.

"The General Studies Component in every baccalaureate degree program
shall consist of five (5) areas of study chosen by the student from the
following eight (8) areas:

I
I
~ (1) Mathematics — Philosophy
[ (2) Physical Sciences

1 (3) Biological Sciences

“3% (4) Foreign Languages
ni#w* (5) Humanities: Literature, Art and Music

(6) History
(7) Social Sciences
(8) Behavioral Sciences

   

  

 

MINUTES OF THE CALLED MEETING OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, DECEMBER 20, 1971

”These Rules shall be waived if they are inconsistent with certification
or accreditation requirements.”

The Chairman called on Professor Flickinger who read the following
prOposal from the Senate Council on implementation for the approved change
in the General Studies Component.

The Senate Council recommends that the implementation for the action
taken relative to changing the Rules on Requirements for Graduation

be the Fall, 1972 with a proviso that colleges and departments be
advised that if they have recommendations for changes in their academic
programs as a result of this Senate action, these must be submitted,

in accordance with prescribed University procedures, by March 1, 1972.

Dr. Flickinger stated that the Senate Council's recommendation is aimed
toward the best interests of the entire University, particularly in respect
to advance registration to be held in the spring of 1972 for the 1972

Fall Semester.

Dr. Stanford Smith presented a motion to amend the section of the Senate
Council's recommendation dealing with the implementation date to make it
effective for those students graduating at the end of the 1973 Spring Semester
and thereafter. The motion was seconded.

Following some discussion of implementation channels, question was called
and the Senate voted for cloture.

The Senate then defeated Dr. Smith's amendment to the Senate Council proposal.

The Senate again voted for cloture on the original proposal and approved the

original proposal as presented by Dr. Flickinger. This proposal, as approved,
reads:

The implementation for the action taken relative to changing the Rules
on Requirements for Graduation shall be the Fall, 1972 and colleges
and departments are advised that if they have recommendations for
changes in their academic programs as a result of this Senate action,
these must be submitted, in accordance with prescribed University
procedureS, by March 1, 1972.

Motion was made to adjourn.

The Chairman recognized Dr. Singletary who extended pleasant Holiday
wishes to the faculty, students, and staff of the University.

Dr. Rovin acknowledged the efforts of the Recording Secretary for her
work for the Senate during the past year. In addition, he asked Mrs.
Parton, secretary to the Senate Council, to stand and be recognized for
her unselfish efforts on behalf of the University Senate and the University.
The Senate accorded Mrs. Parton a round of applause for her work.

Dr. James Ogletree presented a recommendation on behalf of the University

Senate that the Senate rise and acknowledge Chairman Sheldon Rovin for a job well

done. Dr. Rovin was accorded enthusiastic applause for his work as
Chairman over the past year.

   
    
   
   
 
   
   
 
 
 
    
   
  
    
 
  
 
 
   
  
   
  
   
  
  
 
  
   

 

 

 kWh-ferwgl- gag-,yxcv-rjuv-u cm»- W»

   
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
    

MINUTES OF THE CALLED MEETING OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, DECEMBER 20, 1971

El‘lfi The motion to adjourn was approved at 5:30 p.m.
aw',
i

l Elbert W. Ockerman
{ Secretary ,

MINUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, JANUARY 31, 1972

‘ The University Senate met in regular session at 3:00 p.m., Monday,
I January 31, 1972, in the Court Room of the Law Building. Chairman W. Garrett
1 Flickinger, presided. Members absent: Staley F. Adams*, Arnold D. Albright, ;
= Lawrence A. Allen, Daniel 8. Arnold, Ronald Atwood*, James R. Barclay*, Charles E. 1
_fa‘ Barnhart, Harmon C. Bickley*, Wesley J. Birge*, Betty J. Brannan*, Mary R. Brown*, “
WWW I David B. Clark*, Carl B. Cone*, Glenwood L. Creech, Dan M. Daffron*, Robert O.
‘ Evans*, Stuart Forth, Donald T. Frazier, James E. Funk*, George H. Gadbois*, i
Eugene B. Gallagher*, Art Gallaher, Jr.*, Charles P. Graves, Thomas C. Gray*, 5 j p
Jack B. Hall, Joseph Hamburg, Maurice A. Hatch*, Charles F. Haywood*, James W. ‘l- I i
Herron*, James F. Hopkins*, John W. Hutchinson*, Raymon D. Johnson, Joseph R.
Jones*, Stuart M. Klein*, Lois W. Langhorst*, Bruce E. Langlois, Robert G.
Lawson, Leslie L. Martin*, Roger M. McCoy*, Ernest P. McCutcheon*, Alvin L.
Morris, J. W. Patterson, Nancy J. Patton, Leonard A. Ravitz*, Herbert G. H
Reid*, Virginia Rogers*, Gerald I. Roth*, Robert W. Rudd*, Otis A. Singletary*, ‘1 ' 5D
A D. Milton Shuffett*, Leonard P. Stoltz*, Robert H. Stroup*, Thomas B. Stroup, , '3“
' William G. Survant*, Joseph V. Swintosky*, Norman L. Taylor*, Timothy H. Taylor,
A S. Sidney Ulmer*, H. Mac Vandiviere*, M. Stanley Wall, Cynthia Watts*, Ronald D.
[ Weddle*, James H. Wells, David R. Wekstein*, Harry E. Wheeler*, Cornelia B.
l Wilbur, William R. Willard, Miroslava B. Winer*, Ernest F. Witte*, A. Wayne
[ Wonderley*, Fred Zechman*, Robert G. Zumwinkle*.

 

U7 The Chairman reminded the Senators of the ROTC proposal which was on the
€¥$J floor of the Senate as a result of action taken at the May 10, 1971 meeting to
' table the proposal to the regular November meeting of the Senate in the fall and,
i that due to the press of other business had been delayed further to the present
, meeting. He then presented Mr. Howell Hopson, secretary of the Senate Council,
‘ who recommended adoption of the Arts and Sciences proposal on reconstituting the
ROTC departments as academic programs, with the following changes and additions
by the Senate Council. The Arts and Sciences proposal had been circulated to
the faculty under date of December 3, 1971 and the Senate Council substitute
proposal had been circulated under date of December 9, 1971:

; 1. that under item (2) of the A & S report, the Senate establish a
University Senate standing committee on ROTC programs comprising ten

(10) members to be appointed as follows: one administrator and one

staff representative from each of the ROTC programs to be appointed by

the President; three faculty members to be appointed by the Senate Council;
and four students comprising one cadet from each of the ROTC programs and
two non—ROTC students to be appointed by Student Government.

 

*Absence explained

 LMUVERSHY OF KENTUCKY

LEXINGTON. KENTUCKY 40506

DEAN OF ADMISSIONS AND REGISTRAR

December 14, 1971

TO THE UNIVERSITY SENATE

At the written request of more than 10 voting Senators a
special meeting of the Senate has been called for 4:00 p.m.,
Monday, December 20, 1971, in the COURT ROOM OF THE LAW BUILDING
to continue the unfinished business remaining from the meeting
of December 13, 1971.

<éla} Igéfl. flbé/MLW\
bert W. Ockerman
Secretary

\