xt7fn29p5k0p https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7fn29p5k0p/data/mets.xml Ohio Historical Records Survey (Ohio) Survey of Federal Archives (U.S.) United States. Work Projects Administration. Division of Professional and Service Projects National Archives (U.S.) 1940 v, 51 leaves; 27 cm. UK holds archival copy for ASERL Collaborative Federal Depository Program libraries. Call Number FW 4.14:F 317/ser.5/no.34 books English Columbus, Ohio: Ohio Historical Records Survey This digital resource may be freely searched and displayed in accordance with U. S. copyright laws. Ohio Works Progress Administration Publications United States. Department of Justice -- Archives -- Catalogs Justice, Administration of -- Ohio -- Archives Ohio -- History -- Sources -- Catalogs Inventory of Federal Archives in the States: Series V, The Department of Justice; No.34, Ohio text Inventory of Federal Archives in the States: Series V, The Department of Justice; No.34, Ohio 1940 1940 2019 true xt7fn29p5k0p section xt7fn29p5k0p \NIL“lllllnlilfliijiiflllfllfllflfiiflljflll“Ill! ' . INVENTORY or FEDERAL-ARCHIVES Inna STATES ’ Prepared by The Survey of Federal Archives Q Division of Professional and Service Projects Work Projects Administration 3 The National Archives ' Cooperating Sponsor . . .- ' SERIES v. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ’ NO. 34. OHIO UNIVERSE? or KENTUCKY , Columbus, Ohio i The Ohio Historical Records Survey Project . 1 1940 ,r, _ ~ fi'sfigafii“; The Historical Records Survey Projects Philip M. Hamer, Assistant Director in charge of . Inventory of Federal Archives I ‘ John O. Marsh, State Supervisor John H. McMinn, Supervisor, Federal Archives Unit Division of Professional and Service Projects Florence Kerr, Assistant Commissioner Alma B. Kerr, Chief Regional Supervisor Mildred Thrasher, State Director WORK PROJECTS ADMINI smATIor f F. C. Harrington, Commissioner George Field, Regional Director Carl Watson, State Administrator PREFACE The inventory of Federal Arp_h_'g_e_§_ in the States is one of the pro- ducts of the work of the Survey of Federal Archives, which operated as I a nation—wide project of the Works Progress Administration from January 3 l, 1936 to June 30, 1937, and has been continued since that date as a . unit of the Historical Records Survey, also operating; as a, nation—wide ‘ project of the Works Progress Administration, and a group of state or 3,; local projects of that Administration and of the Work Projects Adminis— ‘ tration. ' The plan for the organization of the Inventory is as follows: ‘ Series I consists of reports on the administrationof the Survey, acknowl— edgments, and general discussions of the location, condition, and con- tent of federal archives in the states. Succeeding; series contain the ' detailed information secured by workers of the Survey, in inventory form, a separate series number being assigned to each of the executive , departments (except the Department of State) and other major units of _ the Federal Government. Within each series No. l is a general intro— duction to the field organization and records of the governmental agency concerned; the succeeding numbers contain the inventory proper, sepa— rate numbers being assigned to each state in alphabetical order. Thus, in each series, the inventory for Alabama is No. 2, that for Arizona, 170. 3, that for Arkansas 1'10. 4, etc. For each local office information regarding each series, or unit of A related records, is presented in the following order: title, inclusive dates (“to date" indicating an Open file at the time the information was secured), general description of informational content, description , of the system of filing or indexing (if any), a statement of frequency and purpose of use, form of the record itself (bound volumes, sheets in folders, etc,), linear footage, description of the containers, physical - ‘ condition of the records (not stated if satisfactory), location by room number or other identifying information, and finally, the number of the Form 588A on which this informationwas originally recorded by a Survey worker and from which it was abstracted for the Inventory. This form is , V on file in The National Archives. When it contains substantial informa- ‘ tion on addenda sheets which has not been included in the mimeographed abstract, indication of this is given by use of the reference "See addenda." ' ' In Ohio the work of the Survey was under the direction of Dr. William D. Overman with Mr. William M, Verross as his assistant until February 15, . ' 1937. At that time Mr. Verross became director and served until February 1938. Since then Federal archives work: has been under the technical direction of the Ohio Historical Records Survey Project. Dr. John H, I'vIci-iimi, in charge of the Federal Archives unit, assisted by Mr, Wilbert R, Bruce, classified and edited the materials. This inventory of the rec— ords of the Department of Justice was prepared. in the Columbus office of the Survey and was edited, before final typing, by Mr. R, R, Stenberg ‘ of the Washington office. ' John O, Marsh, State Supervisor , Columbus, Ohio Ohio Historical Records Survey Project May 6, 1940 iv ' CONTENTS ‘ . ’ Page ' INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l . ' ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE ATTOREEY GEDERAL - Cincinnati, Assistant United States Attorney , . . . . . 4 ' Dockets and Indexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ; ' Civil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 , Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Correspondence and Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Cincinnati, United States Marshal . , . . , . . . . . . , ll ' Dockets and Indexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ll ' Fiscal Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Correspondence and Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - Cleveland, United States Attorney . , . , , . , , . , . . 18 - Dockets and Indexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ‘ General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 CiVil.....-..-o...u.onoouuoo- 21 Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ... .... 21 ' Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Correspondence and fiiscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Cleveland, United States Marshal . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 ' Dockets and Indexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 37 1 Fiscal Rocords . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 V ’ Correspondence and Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . 29 ' Columbus, Assistant United States Attorney . . . . . . . 31 Dockets and Indexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 ‘ Civil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 '- Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 ' Correspondence and Hiscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . 31 ‘ Columbus, Deputy United States harshal . . . . . . . . . 33 , Dockets and Indexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Fiscal Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Correspondence and Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Dayton, United States Attorney (not surveyed) . . . . . . 33 ' Dayton, Deputy United States Marshal (not surveyed) . . . 3:5 Steubenville, Deputy United States Marshal . . . . . . . 34 Toledo, Assistant United States Attorney . . . . . . . . 34 .;- Dockets and Indexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 1 CorreSpondence and Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . 38 '. Toledo, Deputy United States Marshal . . . . . . . . . . 39 Fiscal Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 . Correspondence and Liscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Youngstown, Deputy United States Marshal . . . . . . . . 41 ' v Page ; FEDERAL BUREAU OF I1W.E‘:SC[‘IC;‘rATIOl\.T Cincinnati, Field Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 v' Cleveland, Field Office . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . 4:2 . 1.13.1338 DIVISION Zanesville, Special Attorney . . _ . . . . . . . . . . 43 ’ WAR RISK LITIGATION, BUREAU OF Cincinnati, Field Service Office . . . . . . . . . . . 4:4- CHROI‘TOLOGICAL II-TDEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 I 1 l , , e INTRODUCTION » An Attorney General was appointed by the Judiciary act of 1789 but . he had no department under him. For decades he had no supervision or control over those presumably working under his direction. The dis— trict attorneys and marshals throughout the country were practically ‘ autonomous. Edmund Randolph, the first Attorney General, perceiving the weakness of such a system, recommended that the Attorney General be j given control over the district attorneys.1 This control was not granted until 1861,8 The act of 1861 required the district attorneys and marshals to submit reports to the Attorney General, and provided him with clerks to inspect these reports.3 As early as 1867 a bill was introduced in the House of Representatives to bring "all the law offi- cers of the government into one department."4 The Department of Justice was not created, however, until June 22, 1870, when the Attorney Gen- eral at last became the head of an executive department. Congress authorized the first Federal district court in Ohio in 1805 to sit at "the seat of Government." A district attorney and marshal were provided.5 Because Chillicothe was "the seat of government," the first United States district attorney and marshal in Ohio had their official headquarters there. In 1807 Ohio was made a part of the Seventh Circuit.6 and sessions of the circuit court were likewise to be held at Chillicothe. In 1816, after a struggle between politicians representing various , localities, Columbus was made the state capital,7 and four years later Congress ordained that the district Court in the Ohio district and the lAlbert George Langeluttig, The Department 9: Justice 9: 332 United States (Baltimore, 1927), 2. ' 2Ibid., 8. 3Ibid., 8. 4Ibid., 9—10. 5United States Statutes gt Large, II, 202. The district attorney and ’ marshal were to receive "the fees stipulated for these officers" plus . $200 each per annum. Vols. I—VIII of the United States Statutes at ngge were compiled and edited by Richard Peters (Boston, 1848-1856); Vols., IX and X by George Minot (Boston, 1851, 1863); Vol. XI by George Minot and George P. Sanger (Boston, 1859); Vols. XII—XVII by George P, Sanger ‘ (Boston, 1863-1879), Beginning with Vol. XVIII, which was published in 1875, all volumes (XVIII-XLI, which was published in 1938) hare been pub— I lished by the United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 5U, S, Stat. gt Large, II, 420. Kentucky and Tennessee were placed in I the same circuit. In 1866 Ohio was placed in the Sixth Circuit together with Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Ohio remains to this day in the Sixth Circuit. (31:. _s. Stat. :11 Large, XIV, 209). ; 7Eugene Holloway Roseboom and Francis P. Weisenburger, é History 9: Ohio (New York, 1954), 119, l I X 2 f circuit court should meet in that city. The district attorney and mar— shal accordingly shifted their headquarters.8 These courts remained at Columbus until 1842, when they moved to Cincinnati. The law of 1842 , also authorized an adjourned term of the district court for Cleveland,9 ' Inasmuch as there was no mention in the law to the effect that an attor— ney or marshal was to be instituted at Cleveland, it must be assumed that the officials who had been serving in those capacities elsewhere ‘ were to serve as well in that city. ‘ In 1855 Ohio was divided into two districts, northern and southern. Cleveland was designated as the seat of the northern District, and Cin~ ' cinnati as that of the Southern. A district attorney and marshal were ordered appointed for the Southern District; the district attorney and marshal who had previously served the whole state were now attached to the Northern District.10 In 1878 the Eorthern District was divided into Eastern and Western divisions. Cleveland was made the seat of the eastern division, and Toledo that of the Western; but no additional clerk or marshal was appointed, and it was stipulated that resords and papers pertaining to cases in the Western division were to be transferred to the deputy clenr in Toledo.11 This makes it reasonable to assume that a deputy clerk had been created at Toledo in 1872, when optional sessions of the district I court were authorized for that city. The deputy marshal was probably installed there about the same time.12 The Southern District was divided in 1880 into the Eastern and West— ern divisions. Cincinnati was to be the seat of the Western division, ' and Columbus that of the Eastern. It was specifically stated, however, - that for the Eastern division "no additional clerk or marshal shall be appointed in said district."13 At what date a deputy marshal was estab— lished in Columbus in unknown. The office of district attorney was 7 created in that city about 1888. By 1891 it had become evident that the Supreme Court was so overbur— dened that a subordinate Court of appeals was necessary. Hence there was established in that year the Circuit Court of AppeaIS. The Sixth ' Circuit was to include the same territory as the old circuit court had, that is, Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee. The court was to ‘ hold seSSions in Cincinnati. A clerk and a marshal were provided for the court.14 The Judiciary Act of 1911 provided that two terms of the district - : court should be held each year at Youngstown. A deputy marshal was not ‘ - : placed in that city, however, until about 1922. A deputy marshal's . office was established at Steubenville in 1920. The office of the Special Attorney of the Lands Division, Department ‘ of Justice, was established at Zanesville on June 11, 1936. Its purpose 8g. s. Stat. at. Larf‘e, III, 544. 91bid., v, 488—489. , lOIbid., X, 604. ‘ llIbid., xx. 101. ' lZIbid., XVII, 157-158. , 13Ibid., XXI, 64. - } l4Ibid., XXVI, 825. V I 5 ' is to handle all land title litigation and transactions originating with the Soil Conservation Service and the Resettlement Administration in effecting their programs in the Muskingum River Valley. It c00perates in this work with the office of the Title Attorney of the Lands Division, Department of Agriculture, at Columbus. _ Offices of the Federal Bureau of Investigation were opened in Cleve» ‘ land and Cincinnati in 1935. The Director of the Bureau has supervision over investigations of violations of Federal laws except in those mat— ters assigned to some other Federal body, "such as counterfeiting, postal violations, customs violations, immigration and naturalization and internal revenue matters."15 Prior to 1933 all War Risk Insurance litigation was handled by the ~ Veterans’ Administration. In that year, however, such activities were - placed under the Bureau of War Risk Litigation, Department of Justice, ' The Bureau has chargeoi‘all litigation in connection with war risk ‘_ insurance, exclusive of claims in favor of the Government, and of mat— ‘ ters generally which arise under the World War Veterans' Aotznmlkindred statutes. In this work it cooperates closely with the Veterans' Admin— istration. 1 * . ; . 1511. s. Government Manual (I‘Iashington, 11.0., 1959), 105.407. It is . . interesting to note that this Bureau, which now has such wide powers, . V "started as a force of examiners hired by the Attorney General from L". .» ’ , other departments to audit the accounts of the law officers." (Lange— 1uttis‘, 91.1. 952.. 15). l . i 4 , ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ‘ CINCINNATI . ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Federal Bldg., Fifth, Main, and Walnut Sts. The date of the establishment of the United States Attorney's office in Cincinnati is not known, but it is thought that it was set up in 1842 when the District Court was transferred from Columbus to that city. In , any case, it remained under the direction of the Federal Judiciary until . V . 1870, when the Department of Justice was created. Its jurisdiction includes the area covered by the Western Division of the Southern Judi~ cial District of Ohio, in which it is charged with the prosecution of violations of Federal statutes. It has been continuously located in the Federal Building. Careful records have been kept, but those originating prior to 1870 were probably placed in the custody of the Judiciary when ' the transfer to the newly created Department of Justice was made. None of the records antedate 1884. They are fairly complete up to 1920. The records since 1920 are sufficiently complete to give an accurate picture of all activities of the office. ’ Dockets and Indexes l. WITNESS BOOK, n. d. List of witnesses in police cases. (Seldom, official.) 10 x 15 vol., 2 in., in iron safe. Dirty. R. 309. (147) 2. CIVIL DOCKETS, CLOSED, CINCINNATI AND DAYTON, June 18, 1910 — Apr. 9, 1935. Indexed. (Seldom, official.) 12 x 18 vols. (5), 1 £45., ’ in wooden cabinet. R. 309. (166) 3. CRIMINAL DOCKETS, DAYTON, May 7, 1920 — June 4, 1928. Indexed. (Rarely, official.) 11 x 16 vols., 3 in., in wooden bookcase. Bindings broken. R. 309. (155) { 4. CIVIL AND EQUITY DOCKET, PENDING, Aug. 14, 1920 - Feb. 24, 1956. f Entered numerically. (Frequently, official.) 9 x 12 loose—leaf book, 1 3/4 111., in wooden cabinet. R. 509. (103) 5. CRIMINAL DOCKETS, CLOSED, Oct. 13, 1920 — Apr. 5, 1935. Vols. 10 ~ 17. Entered numerically. Indexed. (Rarely, official.) 9 x 12 5 and 11 x 16 vols. and loose—leaf books (8), 1 ft. 8 in., in wooden book~ case. Bindings broken. R. 309. (81,82) .1 . Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati 5 6. GRAED JURY DOCKET, Eov. 1920 — Nov. 1929. Of the Dayton district. Indexed. (Rarely, official.) 11 x 16 vol., 1 in., in wooden bookcase. . R. 309. (91) 7. U. S. ATTORHEYS' REGISTER OF COMPLAINTS, Oct. 1896 — June 1910. Showing description, details, and final disposition of complaints. Indexed. (raven) 5 2; 9 vols. (2), 3 in., on floor. R. 521. (1754) 8. COMPLAIET REGISTER, Jan. 1926 ~ July 1, 1935. Indexed. (Daily, official.) 9 x 12 loose—leaf books, 6 in., in wooden cabinet. R. 309. (84) 9. GENID JURY DOCKETS, Oct. 1926 ~ Jan. 1936. Listing persons drawn for grand jury duty. Indexed. (Older records, rarely; recent records, frequently, official.) 9 x 12 and 11 X 16 loose-leaf books (2), 3 in., ' in wooden cabinet. R. 309. (88) 10. CIVIL AED EQUITY DOCKET, CLOSED,DAYTOE, July 20, 1928 — May 8, '. 1935. Civil cases in front and equity cases in rear of binder. Entered > numerically. (Rarely, official.) 9 x 12 loose~leaf book, i in., in ' ' wooden cabinet. R, 309. (159) ', 9' 11. EQUITY DOCKET, CLOSED, Aug. 3, 1928 ~ Apr. 2, 1935. Filed num- erically. (Rarely, official.) 9 x 12 loose-leaf bundles, 1 in., in wooden cabinet. R. 309. (98) ‘- ‘ 12. CRIMINAL DOCKETS, CLOSED, DAYTON, Hov. 12, 1928 — May 9, 1935. Entered numerically. (Seldom, official.) 9 x 12 vols. (2), 5 in., in wooden cabinet. R. 309. (100) 13. WITNESS DOCKETS, Dov. 1928 to date. Roster of witnesses for -~ Cincinnati and Dayton, showing case numbers, dates of summons, dates reported, and dates of discharge. (Frequently, official.) 9 x 12 loose— leaf books (2), 4 in., in wooden cabinet. R. 309. (85) 14. GENERAL INDEX, Dov. 1928 to date. CoVers dockets of all classes of cases for the Cincinnati district. Entered alphabetically, by dock— ets. (Daily, official.) 9 x 12 loose-leaf books, 3 in., in wooden book— case. B, 309. (90) ~' ~ l 15. GENERAL IEDEX, DAYTON, Nov. 1928 to date. Covers dockets of all classes of cases for the Dayton district. (Frequently, official.) 9 x ' 1 12 loose—leaf books, 3 in., in wooden cabinet. R. 309. (83) ‘ . ' ' 16. INDEX BOOK, Jan. 1, 1931 to date. Numerical and alphabetical index covering general and miscellaneous files. (Daily, official.) 12 ' _, r x 18 vols., 2 in., in drawer of desk. R. 309. (107) - 17, COMPLAIHT REGISTERS, Jan. 1, 1929 to date. Record of complaints ‘ ". of citizens to the district attorney's office. Indexed. (Daily, offi~ cial.) 12 x 12 vols. (3), 9 in., in filing Case. R. 309. (104) j ? Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati 6 I 18. EQUITY DOCKET, June 1929 to date. Index in loose—leaf binder, ‘ (Occasionally, official.) 12 x 15 folders, 3 ft., in drawer of filing ' case. R. 311. (197) 19. COMPLAINT DOCKET, DAYTON, Apr. 28, 1930 - Dec. 30, 1935. Indexed. (Occasionally, official.) 9 x 12 loose~leaf book, 1 in., in wooden cabinet. R. 309. (86) 20. COMPLAINT REGISTER, DAYTON, June 1, 1930 to date. Record of com- plaints of citizens to the district attorney's office. Indexed. (Occar sionally, official.) 12 x 12 vol., 1 in., in filing case. R. 309. (105) 21. CIVIL DOCKET, CLOSED, June 25, 1934 to date. Closed civil cases. (Occasionally, official.) 12 x 18 folders, 1 ft. 6 in., in filing case. R. 509. (198) , 22. GRAND JURY DOCKET, may 1935 to date. Of the Dayton district. , Entered numerically. (Frequently, official.) 9 x 12 loose—leaf book, i ‘ in., in wooden cabinet. R. 309. (102) Civil ‘ 23. MONTHLY REPORTS, 1920 ~ 1923. Correspondence concerning civil suits except Internal Revenue. (Never.) 10 x 18 bundle, 3 in., in . wooden cabinet. Brittle, dirty. R. 510. (119) ' 24. CIVIL CASES, PENDING, 1922 — 1923. Annual report for the year ' 1922 ~ 1923. (Occasionally, official.) 15 x 15 bundles, 1 in., in iron . safe. R. 509. (1794) ‘ Criminal 25. BUCKET SHOP CASES, 1884 — 1908. Copies of briefs in cases Nos. 688 and 689, and newspaper clippings. (Rarely, official.) 4 x 12 envelopes and bundles, 5 in., in cardboard box file and large wooden * cabinet. R. 510. (122) - 26. COWEN MATTER, 1884 — 1908. Correspondence and related papers pertaining to'a shortage that existed when B. R. Cowen was clerk of the . circuit and district courts. (Rarely, official.) 3 x 9 bundles, 3 in., in cardboard box in wooden cabinet. R. 310. (124) 27. ABSTRACT OF CRIMINAL LAWS, 1910 to date. Abstract of laws cover~ ing criminal cases tried by this court. (Occasionally, official.) 12 x " 15 vol., % in., in drawer of desk. R. 311. (1787) I 28. UNITED STATES V. ROY VAN TRESS, May 14, 1918 ~ c. Feb. 1919. Papers in case of Roy Van Tress for violation of Sections 7 and 135 of “ the Penal Code; and communications from the Post Office Inspector in ' Toledo, Ohio, to the Post Office Inspector at Cincinnati. (Never.) 3 x 9 and 7 x 10 envelopes and bundles, 5 in., in wooden drawers of safe. Dirty. R. 509. (155, 114) Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati 7 3 29. VAN TRESS ET A1,, 1918. Correspondence and printed book. ; (Rarely, official.) 9 x 15 vol, and bundles, 6 in., in wooden cabinets. : R, 310. (134) g 30. ALEX CHRISTY ET AL., 1931. Correspondence and papers in criminal j case. (Rarely, official.) 6 x 12 folders, % in., in large iron safe. R. 309. (205) l 81. HERBERT WILSOH ET AL., 1921 — 1925. Reporter‘s transcript of mail robbery case. (Rarely, official.) 8 x 12 vols. tied in bundle, 1 ft., in large wooden cabinet. R. 310. (151) 32. AMERICAH FIEANCE 00., 1923. Records and findings in a criminal case at Dayton. (Seldom, official.) 12 x 18 enveloPes, 1 ft., in wooden cabinet. Dirty. R. 311. (158) 33. AMERICAE STEEL SPRITG CO.. J. H. BENJAMIE, Oct. 1923. Complete record of a case of fraud, statements of witnesses, court findings, etc. (Rarely, official.) 10 x 15 bundles, 6 in., in iron safe. Dirty, R, 309. (93) 34. CINCINNATI POLICE CASE, 1924. Records and correspondence regard— ing the investigation and trial of members of the Cincinnati Police Department, (Seldom, official.) 12 x 18 envelopes, 1 ft., in wooden _ cabinet. Dirty. R. 311. (95) 85. LEVISON CASE, Apr. 1924. Miscellaneous correspondence relative to a mail fraud scheme. (Seldom, official.) 12 x 18 bundles, 6 in., in iron safe. Dirty, R. 509. (97) 36. ALLEGED ELECTION FRAUDS IE PIKE COUNTY, OHIO, 1925. Correspond~ ence and records of investigation. (Rarely, official.) 8 x 11 folders, 3 in., in iron safe, Dirty, n. 509. (96) 37. ZIX CASE, Jan. 1936. Evidence in a robbery case consisting of ' mail bags, etc.; also rough draft of case. (Seldom, official.) 9 x 15 bundle, 1 in., in iron safe. Dirty. R. 309. (140) ‘ _ Eguity 38. LOUIS SIFF ET AL., June 1925. Correspondence in income tax case. " (Seldom, official.) 9 x 15 envelope, 1% in., in iron safe. Dirty. R. 309. (149) ‘ 4 89. EQUITY CASES, DAYTON, July 1983 to date. Index in loose~leaf ‘ binder. (Occasionally, official.) 12 x 15 folders, 4 in., in drawer of filing case. R. 311. (162) ‘ ' ‘ 40. LAW AND EQUITY CASES, PENDING, DAYTON, Apr. 1935 to date. Pend— ing law and equity cases of the Dayton district other than war risk cases. ‘ (Occasionally, official.) 12 x 18 folders, 2 ft., in drawer of filing . . case. R. 309, (206) 1 Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati 8 . 41, OHIO CUSTOMS GARMENT CO. V, THE CLOTHIBRS’ UNION, Jan. — Mar. V 1936. Correspondence, exhibits, etc., in pending case. (Occasionally, official.) 5 x 12 bundles, s in., in iron safe. R. 309. (132) EV E General 42. SOLDIERS' HOME CASES, 1901 — 1907, Letters, briefs, etc., con— - cerning cases of residents of the Soldiers’ Home at Dayton, Ohio. (Rarely, Official.) 5 x 10 envelopes, 5 in., in cardboard box file in v v ‘ large wooden cabinet, R, 310, (125) ' . 43. 28—HOUR LAW CASES, 1908 — 1911, Correspondence and records of . ' cases against railroads for confining cattle in cars exceeding 28 hours without rest, food, or water. (Rarely, official.) 3 x 9 bundle, 2 in., in large wooden cabinet, Dirty. R, 510. (201) v 44. CORBIN CASES, Feb. 8, 1910 ~ Sept, 23, 1911. Correspondence con— cerning the seizure of whiskey by the H. F. Corbin Co. (Rarely, offi— E cial.) 3 x 10 bundles, 6 in., in cardboard box in wooden cabinet. R. 310, (133) E 45. DRESDEN BANK CASE, 1911 ~ 1912. Correspondence, records, etc., , a in the case of the U. S, v. Lattick et. al,, in the Eastern division. (Rarely, official.) 5 x 9 bundleS, 2 in., in cardboard box file in large wooden cabinet, R. 310. (125) v 46. WITHDRAWALS OF LIQUOR, 1915 - 1921, Ganger's return on spirits and entry for the withdrawal of texpaid distilled spirits. (Rarely, E ‘ official.) 3 x 9 envelopes, 8 in., in iron safe. Dirty. R. 509. (116) E 47. MCALLISTBR REAL ESTATE 00,, Jan. ~ Dec. 1917. Correspondence. . (Rarely, official.) 12 x 18 envelopes tied in bundle, in large wooden cabinet, Dirty. R. 510. (129) E 48. CINCINNATI SCREW CO. V. NORDYKB, MARHON, AND CO., INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, Mar, 1919. Correspondence and records of investigation in case. (Seldom, official.) 9 3 15 bundles, 2 in., in iron safe. R. 309. (1795) 49, CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, May and June 1920. CorreSpondonce, - V records of coal shipments, and exhibits in case. (Seldom, official.) 18 x 24 bundles, % in., in iron safe. a. 309. (1792) 50, LEDGER SHEETS, LINCOLN NATIONAL BANK, 1922. Wm. Alexander account for George Remus; and correspondence pertaining to a whiskey case. V (Seldom, official.) 2 x 4 envelopes, 1 in., in iron safe, Dirty. R, 309. (137) E , 51. LEVISON 00,, CINCINNATI, Mar. ~ Sept. 1923. Correspondence and exhibits, (Rarely, official.) 9 x 15 bundle, 8 in., in large wooden cabinet. a. 310. (128) I ' ' 1 Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati 9 52, HAUSER AND GARRISON CASE, 1923 ~ 1924. Case papers. (Rarely, Official.) 9 x 15 envelopes, 4 in., in iron safe. Dirty. R. 809. (139) 53. AMERICAN FINANCE 00., AND UNITED STATES V, EDWARD WUICHET, 1924. Case heard at Dayton. (Rarely, official.) 10 x 12 vol., 2 in., in iron . safe. Dirty. R. 309. (150) 54. LOUIS HEITHAN 00., May 1924. Photostatic copies of tax returns used as evidence. (Rarely, official.) 12 x 18 bundle, % in., in iron safe. R. 509. (1791) 55. FRIES AND FRIES CASE, 1925. Records and correspondence in prohi— ‘ bition case. (Seldom, official.) 9 X 12 enveIOpes, 4 in., in iron safe. R. 309. (152) 55. BLOSSER V. ENDERLIN, ROSS COUNTY APPEALS COURT, 1925. Records ' and correspondence pertaining to case. (Seldom, official.) 15 x 18 vol. and envelopes, 4 in., in iron safe. Dirty, R. 309. (151) 57. WAR RISK CASES, Sept. 1928 to date- Correspondence regarding cases in the Southern District. (Occasionally, official.) 9 x 15 loose . papers, 6 in., in drawer of desk. R. 310. (1788) 58. WAR RISK INSURANCE CASES PENDING, DAYTON, Sept. 1, 1928 to date. ‘ Cases brought before the district attorney for settlement. Filed numeri— - - cally. (Rarely, official.) 10 x 12 folders, 2 ft., in drawer of metal filing case. R. 309. (108) 59. J. J. CASTELLINI BANK CASE, 1951. Witnesses' statements,corre— ~ spondence, work sheets, accounts, photostats, etc. (Seldom, official.) 12 x 18 bundles, 9 in., in compartment of iron safe. Dirty. R. 309. - (145) ', ' 60. ELBINGER SHOE MANUFACTURING C0,, Oct. 1932. Records pertaining to receivership of the company, exhibits, and minutes of a creditors' , . meeting. (Seldom, official.) 10 x 15 enVelopes (3), 5 in., in iron ' safe. Dirty. R. 309. (94) ; , 61. NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RECOVERY ACT CASES, 1934 — 1935. Violations - ' of the NIRA. (Seldom, official.) 10 x 15 envelopes, 2 in., in transfer v " case. R. 311. (142) . Correspondence and Miscellaneous 62. COMHON PLEAS, CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT, n. d. Sealed envelope marked "Important papers," (Sel- dom, official.) 8 x 12 envelope, 1% in., in iron safe. Dirty. R. 309. (148) ' 63. EXHIBITS, n. d. Apparently day books, probably exhibited in the Gerraci and Scott Interstate Commerce Commission Case. (NeVer.) 5 x 15 vols. (4), 8 in., on iron safe. Torn. R. 309. (141) i Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati 10 64. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE, 1905 to date. With other courts in ’ V. the district regarding civil and criminal cases, and with various Fed— ' ’ ' eral, state, and local officials and other persons regarding cases. ' . (Older Records, rarely; Recent records, frequently, official.) Variously sized envelopes, folders, and binders, 82 ft. 6 in., in drawers of filing . cases, in cardboard boxes, and in wooden cabinet. Rs. 309 and 310. . ” p ' (126, 135, 200, 144, 92, 120, 157, 154, 196, 160, 195, 161, 153, 121, _ 150, 164, 117, 138, 109, 156, 115, 99, 163, 208, 199, 127) . .. 65. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPOEDEECE, PERTAINING TO THE U. S. ATTOREEY'S ' " ‘ . OFFICE, n. d. Miscellaneous correspondence pertaining to cases handled ,. ' ,, by the U. S. attorney. (Rarely, official.) 12 x 24 bundle, 1 ft., on ' floor. R. 521. (1782) 65. PURCHASES 0F LAED, Feb. 1908 — Dec. 1911. Correspondence con— . ' '7' cerning the purchasing of land in various Ohio cities for Post Office ' ' sites. (Rarely, official.) 5 x 12 envelopes, 8 in., in 2 drawers of . filing case. R. 509. (202) ' 7 67. LETTER FROM THE DEPARTMEET OF JUSTICE, Jan. 28, 1915. Letter from Attorney General George W. Wickersham to the U. S. attorney enclos— ing a copy of the Telegraphic Code Book, with directions for its use. ' (Never.) 7 x 10 loose sheets, 1/16 in., in drawer of safe. R. 309. “ (115) 68. SEARCH WARRAITS, c. 1917. Served and unserved warrants kept in . - the U. S. attorney's office. (Never.) 4 x 8 loose sheets, % in., in drawer of safe. R. 809. (118) ‘ 69. GENERAL JOURNAL, 1917 ~ 1919. Exhibit in an unknown case, con— taining items on cash and purchases. (Fever.) 12 x 18 vol., 8 in., in iron safe. R. 809. (1790) ‘ 70. COURT EXHIBIT, 1919. Unidentified ledger. (Never.) 12 x 15 vol., 2 in., in iron safe. Dirty. R. 509. (146) a 71. CASH JOURHAL E0. 3, THE FRANKLIN MOTOR CAR CO., Jan. 7, 1920 — ‘ Nov. 25, 1921. Exhibit in case. (Eever.) 15 x 18 vol., 1% in., in l , wooden cabinet. R. 809. (87) . 72. RECORD OF LEAVE, RULES GOVERNIHG LEAVE EFFECTIVE DEC. 1, 1930, j . ‘H' Dec. 1980 ~ July 1954. Discontinued record showing sick leave and other 1 ‘ ' ' absences of department employees. (Occasionally, official.) 8% x 11 ' V01., % in., in small wooden cabinet. R. 809. (89) 75. MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL FILE, Jan. 1, 1951 to date. Records of .. subjects not listed in the filing system. Numerical index volume. ; . ' (Daily, official.) 10 x 18 folders, 15 ft., in 5 drawers of 2 filing - ‘ ' . cases. R. 811. (106) ' 74. MISCELLANEOUS, June 1, 1935 to date. Notebooks giving statements , _. of witnesses in cases brought before the district attorney. (Occasion— ,- * ' ally, official.) 3 x 6 vols., 2 in., in iron safe. R. 309. (204) E United States Marshal, Cincinnati 11 - 75. DIGEST OF RECE?T COURT DECISIOTS IFTLRPRETITC FEDERAL LAWS, Eov. 1 ~ Dec. 1935. Relating to intoxicating liquors. (Frequently, offi— . . cial.) 9 x12 folders, 3; in., in wire basket. 3. 311. (136) UIITED STATES MARSHAL Federal Bldg., Fifth, Main, and Walnut Sts. This office