xt7gf18scp51 https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7gf18scp51/data/mets.xml   Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station. 1968 journals kaes_bulletins_200 English Lexington, Ky. : The Station, 1885- Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin n.200. text Bulletin n.200. 1968 2014 true xt7gf18scp51 section xt7gf18scp51 Regulatory Bulletin 200
REPORT OF `
  ANALYSES OF OFFICIAL 1
_` FERTILIZER SAMLPES
]ULY 1967 - ]UNE 1968
   
z QIBGBS I
bl University of Kentucky
g Agricultural Experiment Station
Lexington

 G
Z?
DIVISION OF REGULATORY SERVICES
KENTUCKY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION ·
L
Bruce Poundstone
Director
Paul R. Caudill -
Assistant Director
W. J. Huffman, Registration Inspector
J. M. Fernandez, Auditor-Inspector
2
FIELD INSPECTORS
Joe E. Brown Wallace L. King Claude E. Hensley
Eugene Vanderpool Ben W. Cox Wilson M. Routt
William K. Robertson Neville Hulette Samuel D. Whitehead
LABORATORY STAFF
Volvo Midkiff John A. Shrader Norma Holbrook
John T. Adair Judy Dombrowski Robert N. Price
Leokadia Woloszyn Elizabeth Brown Carolyn Sue Witt
Barbara Anderson
* * w * * * w k * +
2
This report compiled and prepared by Bruce Poundstone and W. J. Huffman
Analytical data by Laboratory Staff
2
G

 VE
CONTENTS _
A Page
N Explanation of Tables ...,...................................................... 4
Explanation of Certain Columns .......... . ...................................... 5
Companies Represented by Samples Reported in This Bulletin ..................... 6
` "Wild" Samples ............,................................,................... ll
Average Analysis and Coefficient of Variation of Samples Analyzed .............. lZ
~ Summary of Average Percentage of Guaranteed Analysis and Coefficient of
Variation by Plant and Company ............................................ 23
Table l - Analyses of Inspection Samples of Fertilizers ........................ 27
. Table 2 - Analyses of Inspection Samples of Soft Phosphate With
Colloidal Clay ....................................................... 87
Table 3 - Analyses of Inspection Samples of Organic Materials .................. 87
Table 4 - Results of Analyses of Boron in Fertilizers Reported in Table l ..l... 88
Table 5 - Results of Analyses of Secondary and Micro Nutrients in Fertilizers
Reported in Table l ................... . .............................. 89 V
Table 6 - Results of Analyses of Insecticides in Fertilizers Reported in
Table l .............,................................................ 100
R
E
P

 A REGULATORY BULLETIN 200 I
2
This is the first bulletin that we have published since 1946 that contains
the results of the analysis of all official samples secured in a 12-month period. Q
This bulletin contains the results of analyses of 3,452 official samples
of commercial fertilizer made during the period July 1, 1967 through June 30,
1968.
 
Separate tables are provided for the results of the analyses for nitro-
gen, available phosphoric acid and soluble potash, organics, unacidulated
phosphatlc material, boron, secondary and micro nutrients, and aldrin in
fertilizer.
3
EXPLANATION OF TABLES
The information given in the following tables should be useful in deter-
mining how nearly a manufacturer is meeting the chemical guarantee printed
on the bag or tag for the fertilizer represented by the samples listed. This
may be done by comparing the "grade" with the actual analysis listed under
An additional means of comparing guarantees with the analyses of samples 2
is in the percent of relative value found, shown in the column RV. The fol-
lowing examples illustrate how this relative value is calculated:
A 5-10-15 sulfate fertilizer is guaranteed to contain 5 units of nitrogen,
10 units of available phosphoric acid and 15 units of potash. Factors for
computing the relative value of these plant foods are; 3 for nitrogen, 2 for
available phosphoric acid and 1 for potash. Thus the combined guaranteed value
of the product represented is calculated:
5.0 Units of Nitrogen x 3 = 15.0
10.0 Units of Available Phosphoric Acid x 2 = 20.0
15.0 Units of Potash x l = 15.0
Total computed guaranteed value 50.0
The same procedure is followed for "found values." Assuming a sample
of 5-10-15 was found to contain 5.1 units of nitrogen, 10.2 units of avail-
able phosphoric acid and 15.1 units of potash, the relative found value is _
computed:
5.1 Units of Nitrogen x 3 = 15.3
10.2 Units of Available Phosphoric Acid x 2 = 20.4
15.1 Units of Potash x 1 = 15.1 ‘
Total computed value 50.8
50.8 (computed found value of sample) divided by 50.0 (computed guaranteed
value) times 100 (to arrive at percentage) gives 101.6 as the percent of rela-
tive value found .
The analyses indicated by an asterisk are deficient more than the toler-
ance. Occasionally an analysis may be found that appears to be inconsistent
in its marking. For example, two samples that are guaranteed 10% available
phosphoric acid may both be found to contain 9.7l. One of these may have an X
asterisk and the other not. There are two factors that may cause this differ-
ence.
(Continued)
Q

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, 1967 - JUNE, 1968 5
A
1. These tolerances are calculated by an electronic computer and applied
io the laboratory analyses before these data are rounded off to the nearest
enth of a percent. In the above example, the laboratory found 9.66% for
one sample and 9.74% for the other. The first one would be starred as de-
ficient.
,2. The grade is written by using the largest whole number in the guarantee
lbf each ingredient. For example, a custom—mixed lot of fertilizer may be
guaranteed 0 -ll.9—ll.2. The grade would be written O-ll~ll. However, the
tolerances are calculated on the 11.9% and 11.2% guarantees.
_ If this fertilizer analyzed 11.3% A.P.A. and 10.9% potash, the 11.3%
g.P.A. would be starred because this analysis is 0.6% units below the 11.9%
guarantee.
The use of a high speed computer to make these calculations enables us
to apply these tolerances more precisely than has been possible before.
In some samples a deficiency in one nutrient is accompanied by an over-
run in another nutrient. This may be evidence of improper mixing or weighing
by the manufacturer. Extreme variations of this kind cannot be attributed
gp separation of materials (segregation) after the product is bagged though
this may be a minor factor. Excess of one nutrient cannot compensate for defi~
ciency of another nutrient. The purchaser is entitled to receive the full
guarantee for all nutrients as expressed by the manufacturer's guaranteed
analysis.
EXPLANATION OF CERTAIN COLUM S
The letters NIT after a grade means that the product is, or that it
ontains Nitrate of Potash. The W/B after a grade indicates that the sample ,
éontained boron and the W/ME means that the sample was analyzed for secon-
dary and micro—nutrients. The column headed "Num" lists the laboratory
number of the particular sample. In the column headed "xs CL", an asterisk
indicates the sample did not meet the guarantee for sulfate of potash. The
RV column shows the percent of relative value found.
•
A
I

 6 REGULATORY BULLETIN 200
COMPANIES REPRESENTED BY SAMPLES REPORTED IN THIS BULLETIN ·
 
Agrico Chemical Company Chilean Nitrate Sales Corporation V
5050 Poplar Ave. 120 Broadway
Memphis, Tennessee 38101 New York, New York 10005
Allied Chemical Corporation Christian County Supply Co.
South Point, Skyline Drive F
Ohio 45680 Hopkinsville, Kentucky 42240
American Cyanamid Company Cline Fertilizer Company `
P. O. Box 400 P. O. Box 67
Princeton, New Jersey 08540 Ewing, Virginia 24248 3
Armour Agricultural Chemical Co. Cominco American, Inc.
Box 1685 818 West Riverside Ave.
Atlanta, Georgia 30301 Spokane, Washington 99201
Ballard County Coop. Co mercial Solvents Corporation
LaCenter, 260 Madison Avenue
Kentucky 42056 New York, New York 10016 `
Blackstone Guano Co. Com onwealth Fertilizer Company 1
c/o Mobil Chemical Co. Morgantown Road
401 East Main St. Russellville, Kentucky 42276
Richmond, Virginia 23208 A
Elance Products Co.
Bluegrass Plant Foods, Inc. 740 South Alabama Street ·
447 N. Main Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46206
Cynthiana, Kentucky 41031
Farmers Chemical Association
Bunton Seed Company P. 0. Box 67
939 Jefferson Street Tyner, Tennessee 37392
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
Farmland Industries, Inc.
Burley Belt Fertilizer Company P. O. Box 7305
Route #4 Kansas City, Missouri 64116
Lexington, Kentucky 40505
Farmsco of Kentucky
Burley Belt Chemical Co. Route 1 .
Box 7 Gracey, Kentucky 42232
London, Kentucky’ 40741
Farmers Fertilizer Company
Central Farmers Fertilizer Co. Smiths Grove,
100 South Wacker Drive Kentucky 42171 ‘
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Federal Chemical Company
Chevron Chemical Company 646 Starks Building
940 Hensley Street Louisville, Kentucky 40202
Richmond, California 94801
(Continued) '
1
1

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, 1967 - JUNE, 1968 7 `
<
COMTANIES REPRESENTED BY SAMTLES REPORTED IN THIS BULLETIN (Cont'd)
Franklin Crop Service Hillenmeyer Nurseries _
Route #3 R.R. #6, Sandersville Road
Franklin, Kentucky 42134 Lexington, Kentucky 40505
Frasier Supply Company Hopkins County Farm Service
505 west Main Street P. 0. Box 306
tGlasgow, Kentucky 42141 Madisonville, Kentucky 42431
Free Flow Fertilizer Company Howe-Hilliard Grain Company
`Box 119 Mayfield,
gaumee, Ohio 43537 Kentucky 42066
Glasgow Fertilizer Company Hutson Chemical Company
Industrial Avenue 103 Maple Street
Glasgow, Kentucky 42141 Murray, Kentucky 42071
. R. Grace & Company Hydroponic Chemical Company
Agricultural Products Division Box 97-C
101 N. Charles Street Copley, Ohio 44321
Baltimore, Maryland 21203
, International Minerals & Chemical Corp.
Graves County Soil Improvement Assn. Old Orchard Road
Mayfield, Skokie, Illinois 60078
Kentucky 42066
Kaiser Agricultural Chemicals
Green Belt Chemical Company P. 0. Box 246
T. 0. Box 636 Savannah, Georgia 31402
Springfield, Ohio 45501
Kengas Division —
Green Valley Farm Supply Co. Tennessee Liqucfied Gas
sland, 3002 Fairview Drive
Kentucky 42350 Owensboro, Kentucky 42301
Gro-Green Chemical Company Kentucky Fertilizer Works, Inc.
P. O. Box 388 P. O. Box 595
Shelbyville, Kentucky 40065 Winchester, Kentucky 40391
Gulf Oil Corporation Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation
Agricultural Chemicals Division Kerr-McGee Building
Dwight Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102
Kansas City, Missousi 64105
Martin Bros. Implement Company
Hercules Powder Company Roanoke,
$10 Market Street Illinois 61561
Wilmington, Delaware 19899
Mayfield Milling Company
Heritage House Products Box 311
300 Union Commerce Building Mayfield, Kentucky 42066
Cleveland, Ohio 44115 (Continued)
E

 8 REGULATORY BULLETIN 200 _
A
COMPANIES REPRESENTED BY SAMPLES REPORTED IN THIS BULLETIN (Cont'd) _
Mays Oil & Allied Chemical C0. Royster Company ;
Box 347 P. 0. Drawer 1940
Princeton, Kentucky 42445 Norfolk, Virginia 2350l
Miles Farms Schochoh Crop Service
Route #3 Route #5 *
Owensboro, Kentucky 42301 Russellville, Kentucky 42276
Mississippi Chemical Corporation O. M. Scott & Sons Company
P. 0. Box 388 Marysville, _
Yazoo City, Mississippi Ohio 43040 A
Mobil Chemical Company Sears, Roebuck & Company
Agricultural Chemical Division 925 South Homan Ave.
401 East Main Street Chicago, Illinois 60607 _
Richmond, Virginia 23208
Sinclair Petrochemicals, Inc.
Monsanto Company 120 South Riverside Plaza _
800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60606 `
St. Louis, Missouri 63166 A
Smith-Douglass Company, Inc. °
Na-Churs Plant Food Company P. 0. Box 419
421 Monroe Street Norfolk, Virginia 23501
Marion, Ohio 43303
Southern States Cooperative, Inc. _
North American Fertilizer Company Fertilizer Division
Preston Street at Bergman 7th and Main Streets
Louisville, Kentucky 40217 Richmond, Virginia 23213
Ohio Valley Fertilizer, Inc. Stanley Crop Service
P. O. Box 579 Stanley,
Maysville, Kentucky 41056 Kentucky 42375
Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation Sterns Nurseries, Inc,
P. 0. Box 991 404 william Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Geneva, New York 14456
Pennsylvania Dutch Fertilizer Co. Stewart Fertilizer Service, Inc. -
Box 180 Mt. Vernon,
Lebanon, Pennsylvania 17042 Kentucky 40456
Phillips Petroleum Company Swift & Company
841 Adams Building Agricultural Chemical Division A
Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74004 National Stock Yards, Illinois 62071
Ra-Pid-Gro Corporation Tennessee Corporation
88 Ossian Street 1330 W. Peachtree Street N.W.
Dansville, New York 14437 Atlanta, Georgia 30309
(Continued)
1

 COM RCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, 1967 - JUNE, 1968 9
COMPANIES REPRESENTED BY SAMPLES REPORTED IN THIS BULLETIN (Cont'd)
C5 Tobacco States Chemical Company Valley Counties of Kentucky Coop.
Box 479 P. O. Box 127
Lexington, Kentucky 40501 Benton, Kentucky 42025
Tompkinsville Fertilizer Company Warner Fertilizer Company
, Tompkinsville, P. O. Box 707
Kentucky 42167 Somerset, Kentucky 42501
_ Union Fertilizer Company
Morganfield,
Q Kentucky 42437
D
{

 10 REIJUIATORY BULLETIN ZOO
The listing on pages l2 thru 22 shows the average analysis and coefficient of
variation for each grade where two or more samples of a grade are reported. These '
data also show the average percentage of guarantee and the coefficient of variations
for all grades reported for a company, or plant, when more than one plant is listed ,3
and ten or more samples are reported.
The listing on pages 23 thru 26 is a summary of the average percentage of guar-
antee and the coefficient of variation by plant and company.
 
nv
The coefficient of variation is proposed as a means for reducing this to a sta-
tistic that is useful. The method for doing this will be found in textbooks on sta·
tistics and when applied to a guarantee of 57.. nitrogen is calculated as follows: —
Sample Number Nitorgen Guarantee Found Sguared   ·
A 5.0 5.6 31.36
B 5.0 5.5 30.25
C 5.0 5.4 29.16
D 5.0 5.7 32.i•9 ‘
E 5.0 5.5 30.25
F 5.0 5.8 33.6io
G 5.0 5.0 25.00 `
H 5.0 6.0 36.00
I 5.0 5.5 30.25 4
J 5.0 5.3 28.09
55.3 306.49
l0 Samples, average analysis =   = 5.53
2
Standard deviation = \ / 306.!•9 -   = \/ 0.38 = 0.275
10 — 1
Coefficient of variation = 0.275 x 100 = L.97 - 5.07,
5.53
lf in this example there had been less variation or "scatter", the resulting per-
centage would have been smaller. lf there had been more variation, it would have been _
larger. The coefficient varies directly with the range in values of analyses.
4

 COM RCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, l967 - JUNE, 1968 ll
"WILD" SAMPLES
Q No matter how much care is exerted in a fertilizer plant, an occasional
"wild" sample may appear. Such samples are caused by unusual circumstances
such as putting the wrong fertilizer in bags labeled for another grade or
large errors in mixing or manipulation in the factory that cannot be said to
represent usual procedure.
 
Computations that include such samples would only throw the coefficient
of variation as well as the average analysis completely out of line. They are
judged to be so abnormal they have not been included in these statistical deter-
minations. There were only 20 such samples in the mixed fertilizer samples
q reported. As a basis for excluding these samples, the following rules were
followed:
l. Throw out any samples more than llO% or less than 90% in relative
value except:
a. The sample is within j 10% of the average sample value.
b. The variation of all the sample values is such that the samples
more than j l0% appear to fit a normal distribution pattern.
I
2. Throw out individual samples whose ratio of ingredients differs strong-
ly from the balance of samples of the grade. These may include samples:
a. whose ratio strongly suggests an entirely different grade of fer-
tilizer. V
b. Two or more of whose ingredients are higher or lower by 1U% or .
more of the extreme values of the remaining normal samples.
NOTE ON METHODS OF COMPUTATION USED
It is apparent that the computation of coefficients of variation and even
the simple averages for a large number of samples requires a great many mathe-
matical operations. The cost would make the operation impossible by ordinary
methods, but the use of the digital computer leased by the University of Kentucky
enables us to make these computations.
The machine program for this work was developed especially for the purpose
and is available for use on the computer at the University of Kentucky. It
will be duplicated for use on other IBM 360 computers at no charge.
E

 12 REGULATORY BULLETIN 200
Average Analysis and Coefficient 0f Variation of Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 19682
NO. COEFFICIENT OF
COMPANY AND PLANT GRADE SAMPLES AVERAGE ANALYSIS VARIATION
AGRIC0 CHEMICAL COMPANY
Memphis, Tenn. O-Z0- O 2 --- 21.3 --- --- 0.2 ---._
0-20-20 3 --— 21.8 20.4 --- 1.4 4.2*
4-12- 8 5 4.5 12.3 8.5 8.1 4.6 7.3
4-16- 4 2 4.1 15.9 4.4 5.2 0.9 11.3
5-10-15 34 5.3 10.5 14.9 6.9 8.4 7.8
5-20-20 19 5.3 19.5 20.0 5.4 5.0 3.5_
6- 6-18 4 6.8 6.3 18.5 12.4 2.5 1.7
6-12-12 19 6.1 12.1 12.7 5.6 4.8 6.5
6-24-24 2 6.1 23.1 24.6 8.1 1.8 2.3 _
8- 8-18 4 8.4 8.2 18.4 1.5 3.2 1.7
10-10-10 13 10.3 10.6 10.3 2.4 3.6 3.1i
12-12-12 5 12.3 12.4 12.5 2.5 3.7 2.2
15-15-15 2 15.0 15.9 15.9 0.0 1.3 1.3
30- O- 0 2 30.6 --- --- 3.0 --- ---
82- 0- 0 32 82.0 --- --- 0.1 --- ---
GRQBES % OF GUAR. CV
153 101.1 102.2 101.5 4.5 4.2 4.8
ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL
CHEMICAL COMPANY
Atlanta, Ga. 0- 0-50 4 --- --- 51.0 --- --- 1.4
0-20- 0 8 --- 18.8 --- --- 6.6 ---
0-20-20 3 --- 19.8 20.2 --- 7.3 4.8
0-25-25 4 --- 24.3 23.9 --- 6.1 8.0
0-25-258 2 --- 21.7 23.1 --- 5.2 3.3
0-46- 0 4 --- 47.1 --- --- 0.9 ---
3-12-24 2 3.8 11.5 20.6 5.6 4.9 20.3
4-12- 8 8 4.4 12.1 9.3 6.5 5.3 6.4
5-10- 5 2 7.3 10.0 6.9 15.5 3.5 9.2
5-10-10 5 5.7 10.3 11.8 8.3 4.6 9.0
5-10-15 65 5.3 10.1 14.9 6.1 3.9 4.9
5-20-20 34 5.2 19.0 20.0 5.9 5.3 5.3
6- 6-18 3 6.6 7.2 17.8 6.0 8.4 1.6‘
6-12-12 40 6.2 12.0 12.4 5.4 4.9 8.3
6-12-18 31 6.1 12.0 18.0 7.8 3.0 4.7
10- 6- 4 2 9.9 7.8 6.1 2.8 0.0 4.6
10-10-10 42 10.3 10.2 10.6 5.7 5.0 7.1
10-10-20 3 10.0 10.0 19.4 7.5 0.6 3.3
12-12-12 10 11.7 12.5 12.7 4.3 2.1 4.7
12-12-18 11 12.0 12.1 17.9 5.5 5.0 6.6
12-24-24 2 12.3 23.7 23.8 2.8 0.1 7.7
15-15-15 10 15.3 15.9 16.3 2.9 2.8 4.1
15-40- 5 5 15.7 41.0 6.2 1.3 1.0 12.6A

 CO MERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, 1967 - JUNE, 1968 13
Average Ana1ysis and Coefficient of Variation uf Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 1968
·éC¤nt'd)
N0. COEFFICIENT OF
COMTANY AND PLANT GRADE SAMPLES AVERAGE ANALYSIS VARIATION
ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL
s'; CHEMICAL COMPANY
Atlanta, Ga. (Cont'd) 28- 0- 0 2 29.5 0.9 ——-
33.5- 0- 0 5 34.4 1.3 ---
82- 0- 0 3 82.0 0.1 ---
, G§g;ES *1. OF cum. cv
320 103.0  101.7 5.:. 4.1 6.3
Cincinnati, Ohio 5-10-10 2 5.1 10.8 11.4 2.7 3.2 0.1
5-10-15 7 5.6 9.9 15.1 4.8 2.6 1.7
D 5-20-20 6 5.2 19.9 19.7 2.6 2.1 3.8
6-12-12 5 6.0 12.6 12.2 5.2 5.6 6.8
6-12-18 4 6.3 12.2 18.0 5.2 4.5 6.0
10-10-10 3 9.9 11.2 11.7 6.7 10.3 7.4
GQXEES Z OF GUAR. CV
31 104.0 101.7 101.7 4.5 4.5 4.3
Jeffersonville, Ind. 0-20- O 2 -·- 19.9 --— --— 1.4 --- ‘
0-25-25 2 --- 25.4 24.0 --- 3.0 1.7
· 4-12- 8 2 4.5 11.6 9.2 1.5 6.7 9.2
5-10-10 2 5.5 11.1 10.8 11.6 7.6 3.9
5-10-15 9 5.3 10.2 15.3 7.2 7.9 6.0
5-20-20 8 5.5 19.2 19.8 13.8 5.1 3.9
6-12-12 5 6.1 11.8 12.2 4.1 2.6 1.6
6-12-18 5 6.0 12.0 18.7 8.4 1.8 4.0
10-10-10 11 10.3 10.7 11.1 7.0 7.2 9.6
GQEEES % OF GUAR. CV
51 104.0 100.7 103.2 7.9 5.1 4.9
Nashville, Tenn. 3-12- 6 3 4.1 11.6 7.2 19.7 1.3 6.0
4-12- 8 4 4.6 11.9 9.5 8.3 2.1 6.7
5-10-10 3 5.5 10.1 10.4 5.2 8.6 6.0
5-10-15 2 5.3 9.9 15.1 6.7 2.8 7.0
5-20-20 7 5.1 19.1 20.2 6.1 3.3 5.6
6-12-12 12 6.1 11.7 12.5 6.1 4.7 6.6
6-12-18 4 6.0 11.3 17.9 2.1 4.5 4.7
6-18-12 2 6.0 15.9 13.0 2.3 15.1 1.6
6-24-24 3 6.4 24.0 24.6 0.9 1.9 3.2
10-10-10 8 9.8 10.3 10.7 3.3 3.9 3.7
12-24-24 2 12.5 25.4 23.9 4.5 1.1 4.7
, 15-15-15 2 15.5 15.8 15.9 1.3 1.3 0.9
GQXBES 7 OF GUAR. CV
59 103.1 99.1 103.9 5.6 4.1 4.9

 14 REGULATORY BULLETIN 200
Average Analysis and Coefficient of Variation of Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 1968
(cmw.1) 1.
commuy AND pmm umm; SA:gT;Es Avmzmz ANALYSIS C°$,§;;i§g§ OF
BLUEGRASS PLANT FOODS, »
INC. `
Danville, Ky. 0-20- 0 2 --- 18.5 --- --- 1.9 ---
5-10-10 2 5.9 9.7 11.9 1.2 0.7 2.3
5-10-15 10 5.4 9.9 16.4 5.3 3.9 3.9
5-20-20 5 5.8 20.5 21.5 4.5 4.7 3.3_
6- 6-18 4 6.1 6.5 19.5 2.3 13.6 12.0
6- 8- 6 2 6.8 8.0 7.2 3.1 5.3 4.9 `
6-12-12 6 7.1 11.6 12.8 4.6 5.8 9.3
10-10-10 6 10.6 10.0 11.2 3.9 6.5 5.3
12-12-12 3 11.5 12.3 13.2 8.3 7.3 7.6·4
GQREES 7. OF cum. cv
47 107.7 100.1 108.7 4.3 5.7 6.1
BURLEY BELT FERTILIZER
COMPANY
Lexington, Ky. O-Z0-20 3 —·- 20.2 19.4 --- 2.0 5.3
0-25-25 2 --- 25.2 24.7 --- 7.8 3.7
3- 9- 6 2 3.5 8.9 7.6 13.9 0.8 3.7
4-12- 8 2 4.4 11.9 8.7 0.0 4.7 4.h
4-16- 4 3 4.6 15.8 5.3 4.5 6.2 19.7
5-10-10 5 5.2 10.1 10.3 4.9 3.1 6.1
5-10-15 12 5.3 10.0 15.4 3.6 2.6 3.5
5-20-20 6 5.5 19.6 19.8 4.8 3.5 4.5
6- 6-18 6 6.0 6.4 18.2 4.8 5.3 1.7
6- 8- 6 3 6.5 7.8 7.1 0.8 8.6 5.0
6-12-18 3 6.4 12.2 17.8 5.5 3.5 4.8
8-10-15 6 8.3 10.2 15.3 2.7 4.0 1.8
8-16-16 3 7.7 15.7 17.7 5.2 1.9 6.9
10-10-10 23 10.2 10.3 10.2 4.0 5.0 5.5
10-10-20 3 10.0 10.0 20.2 5.5 9.4 4.7
12-12-12 6 12.3 12.1 12.0 2.3 2.3 3.1
20-10-10 2 19.6 10.6 11.3 0.3 4.6 3.7'
GQIQEES x OF cum. cv
102 104.7 101.6 101.9 4.1 4.3 5.0
BURLIQY BELT CHEMICAL CO.
Lmuion, Ky. O- 0-60 Z --- --- 59.4 --— --- 4.7
0-20-20 2 --- 21.2 18.8 --- 0.6 3.0
3- 9- 6 3 3.6 8.8 6.8 9.6 9.5 3.7
5-10-10 4 5.2 10.2 10.0 8.0 0.8 1.9
5-10-15 3 5.3 10.2 15.0 3.7 5.9 3.5*
5-20-20 7 5.2 19.8 19.9 7.9 3.4 6.4

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, 1967 - JUNE, 1968 15
Average Analysis and Coefficient cf Variation of Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 1968
§(C¤nt'd)
commm AND PLANT GRADE SAQQLES Avmmcz ANALYSIS Cogggiggg OF
BURLEY BELT CHEMICAL C0.
` London, Ky. (C0nt.d) 6-12-12 14 6.3 12.0 12.1 7.6 6.3 5.1
10-10-10 14 10.3 10.3 10.0 3.3 3.3 3.0
12-12-12 3 11.7 12.4 11.6 1.3 5.2 4.3
GQEES 1. or cuzuz. cv
61 104.1 100.5 100.2 5.9 4.4 4.1
COMMONWEALTH FERTILIZER
` COMTANY
I. Russellville, Ky. 4-12- 8 2 4.7 12.9 10.7 0.0 6.0 14.5
* 4-16- 4 2 3.9 17.1 3.5 0.0 2.9 16.1
5-10-15 3 5.8 11.0 15.8 3.6 1.8 5.3
5-20-20 11 5.5 19.7 20.2 6.2 4.6 9.0
6-12-12 8 6.1 13.4 13.0 5.4 4.4 6.0
6-12-12ME 2 6.3 12.6 13.5 6.7 1.7 0.1
6-18-12 7 6.2 17.9 13.5 7.6 4.6 8.6
6-21-18 2 6.8 20.1 18.7 0.0 3.8 5.2
6-21-18ME 2 6.7 20.6 18.1 3.1 0.0 6.6
7-21-10 4 6.7 19.7 13.1 4.2 4.3 12.4
8-12-15 3 7.2 14.2 14.5 4.8 11.7 15.2
B-12-15Mm 2 7.7 12.3 16.1 3.6 4.0 2.6
10-10-10 14 9.3 11.1 12.2 7.2 9.0 9.1
82- 0- 0 3 82.0 --— --- 0.1 -—- --- ·
GQEEES Z OF GUAR. CV
70 100.3 102.9 109.0 4.4 5.0 8.6
FEDERAL CHEMICAL COMPANY
Humboldt, Tenn. 4-12-16 2 4.7 12.4 16.7 6.0 4.5 2.9
5-10-15 2 5.3 9.6 13.9 9.4 1.4 3.5
5-25-25 2 6.0 23.7 15.4 4.7 10.1 1.8
6-12-12 2 6.2 12.0 11.6 1.1 1.7 6.1
. 12-12-12 3 11.3 13.6 12.4 2.8 13.2 9.3
GQEES 7. or cuzm. cv
17 103.4 102.5 100.9 4.7 6.5 4.9
Louisville, Ky. 0- 0-50 2 --- --- 50.9 --- --- 0.8
0-20- 0 7 --- 19.5 —-- --- 3.5 ---
0-20-20 13 --- 19.6 20.0 --- 5.4 10.3
4-12- B 10 4.5 12.7 10.6 9.0 10.3 15.6
4-16- 4 3 4.5 15.0 9.2 6.3 4.6 42.8
P 5-10-15 28 5.7 10.5 15.1 7.5 7.2 3.8
5-20-20 35 5.4 19.4 20.1 11.9 5.0 7.1
5-25-15 2 5.9 22.9 16.6 20.5 0.2 7.2

 16 REGULATORY BULLETIN 200 _
Average Analysis and Cocfficicnt cf Variation of Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 1968
(C0nC'd) 3
COMPANY AND PLANT GRADE SA;;£ES AVERAGE ANALYSIS CO$§;;§;§g§ OF
FEDERAL CHEMICAL COMPANY  
Louisville, Ky. (Cunc'd) 6- 6-18 4 6.2 8.1 19.6 5.4 17.7 9.1
6-12-12 38 6.5 12.4 12.8 10.0 4.8 8.0
6-18-12 2 6.0 17.3 12.3 1.2 4.9 14.9
6-24-24 2 6.4 22.3 25.4 12.2 2.5 11.6
9-10-15 12 8.9 10.5 16.0 3.7 2.6 3.6.
10-10-10 32 10.1 10.6 11.0 5.5 5.4 9.2 `
10-10-15 7 10.5 10.3 15.9 4.1 14.1 5.8
12-12-12 11 11.7 12.3 12.8 5.1 3.4 8.1
12-12-12ME 3 10.9 12.4 12.3 14.7 12.0 1.6
33.5- 0- 0 3 34.3 --- --- 1.6 --- ---‘
GIIQFSES 2. ur cum. cv
218 104.5 101.4 104.8 7.9 6.2 8.9
FRASIER FARM SUPPLY CO. 7
Glasgow, Ky. 5-20-20 4 5.0 20.0 21.2 2.0 2.2 2.9
6-12-12 5 5.4 10.4 13.8 11.5 17.3 10.6
10-10-10 4 9.9 9.7 11.1 6.2 11.4 16.4
GQEES 7. OF cuA1<. cv *
24 100.6 98.2 107.4 § 10.6 10.0
GLASGOW PERTILIZER C0.
Glasgow, Ky. 4-12- 8 2 4.6 11.8 9.5 3.0 2.4 13.4
5-10-15 3 5.5 10.3 16.2 3.8 2.0 5.3
5-10-15ME 4 5.6 10.3 16.1 3.9 3.7 3.9
5-20-20 6 5.3 20.5 20.1 6.1 9.0 7.6
6-12-12 5 8.1 12.4 14.2 40.3 13.1 8.5
10-10-10 9 10.0 10.6 11.0 3.2 3.1 7.5
12-12-12 2 12.7 12.3 12.9 1.6 4.0 1.6
12-24-24 2 12.3 24.1 21.7 3.4 2.0 11.4
20-10-10 2 20.0 10.4 11.0 0.3 3.4 5.8_
Gxgm x OF cum. cv
41 107.2 103.2 106.3 8.2 5.2 7.2
w.R. GRACE 6. COMPANY
Nnshvillc, Tenn. 0-20- 0 2 --- 19.7 --- --- 1.4 ---
0-20-20 2 --- 20.1 20.0 --- 4.2 5.6
3-10-30 6 3.5 10.4 29.4 11.4 5.5 1.8
4-12- 8 3 5.0 10.9 9.5 4.1 2.4 1.0
5-10-15 11 5.0 9.8 15.1 3.4 1.7 1.9
5-20-20 13 5.3 19.8 20.1 6.1 1.8 4.3*
6-12-12 7 5.8 12.1 12.7 6.0 2.6 4.6
6-24-24 2 6.3 24.2 23.1 0.0 0.3 4.9
10-10-10 10 10.2 10.0 10.5 3.8 3.0 3.5

 COM ERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, 1967 - JUNE, 1968 17
Average Analysis and Coefficient of Variation of Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 1968
·(C0nt:'d)
 
. COMPANY AND PLANT cmma SMELES Avmmca ANALYSIS Cogiggigg OF _
W.R. GRACE 6 COMPANY
Nashville, Tenn.
(C¤nt'd) 10-10-15 4 10.5 10.1 15.5 1.6 5.2 3.9
¥ 15-15-15 3 15.2 15.9 14.8 1.0 7.6 4.9
GQILQEES n Z OF GUAR. CV
103.4 99.5 101.0 4.6 3.1 3.5
New Albany, Ind. 0-20- O 11 --- 18.9 --- --- 4.8 ---
0-25-25 4 --- 27.0 23.5 --- 4.8 7.4
3-10-30 2 3.9 10.0 29.4 1.8 2.8 2.4
4-12- 8 ll 4.9 12.4 9.0 8.6 2.3 8.5
5-10-15 24 5.3 10.4 15.4 4.7 6.0 5.4
5-20-20 21 5.4 20.3 20.0 7.0 3.4 3.7
6- 6-18 3 6.5 7.2 18.6 8.5 4.2 1.5
6-12-12 ‘ 19 6.5 12.7 12.2 7.4 3.2 6.4
6-12-18 6 6.2 12.4 18.2 3.9 2.2 2.5
6-24-24 3 5.9 24.7 23.9 6.7 2.1 2.3
6-38- 6 4 6.2 36.5 7.6 3.5 2.5 3.8
10-10-10 22 10.0 10.8 10.8 4.3 4.8 6.3
12-12-12 7 11.7 12.5 12.6 2.6 5.6 3.3
GQkgES Z OF GUAR. CV
146 104.9 102.7 102.9 5.6 4.0 4.9
GRO-GREEN CHEMICAL C0.
Shelbyville, Ky. 5-10-15 3 7.2 10.8 12.4 28.2 7.9 13.3
5-20-20 3 6.2 16.9 19.3 5.7 2.6 14.8
8-10-15 8 8.4 10.5 13.3 7.6 8.7 7.4
8-12-15 2 8.5 12.3 14.1 4.1 14.9 1.0
8-12-151E 3 8.8 14.3 13.1 3.0 15.0 14.9
9-13-12 3 10.0 15.1 11.2 9.5 17.7 20.1
10-10-10 5 10.0 10.8 9.8 6.1 18.7 14.7
GQXSES Z 0F GUAR. CV
41 110.1 102.8 98.5 9.0 12.1 12.3
SULF OIL CORP.
Cecilia, Ky. 0-20- 0 2 --- 19.4 --- --- 8.7 ---
4-12- 8 5 5.0 12.4 8.7 7.4 7.5 11.2
5-10-15 6 5.6 9.8 16.6 5.7 3.0 2.5
5-20-20 4 5.4 20.1 20.2 9.4 5.2 5.1
6-12-12 3 6.7 12.5 12.2 5.1 1.8 9.4
6-24-12 3 6.6 24.4 11.9 0.1 0.6 2.9

 18 REGULATORY BULLETIN 200
Average Analysis and Coefficient of Variation of Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 1968
(C¤nt‘d) .»
Q
N0. COEFFICIENT 0F~
COMPANY AND PLANT GRADE SAMPLES AVERAGE ANALYSIS VARIATION
GULF OIL CORP.
Cecilia, Ky. (C0nt'd) 8-10-15 2 8.2 10.3 13.7 0.8 0.7 3.
10-10-10 5 10.2 10.9 11.0 5.0 5.1 5.2
12-12-12 3 12.3 12.6 11.8 2.4 6.4 5.6
ALL . {J
GRADES A OF GUAR. CV
33 107.7 102.1 103.9 4.8 4.4 5.7
Henderson, Ky. 4-10-15 2 4.8 10.7 16.5 7.4 13.2 4.2
5-20-20 8 5.6 19.3 21.0 5.6 3.6 3J
5-20-30 4 5.2 20.1 30.4 5.5 4.7 1
6-24-24 2 6.1 23.5 24.9 1.1 3.6 1
10-10-10 3 9.9 9.8 11.1 3.5 7.1 6Q
12-12-12 2 9.5 18.3 15.1 8.2 0.3 7.
30- 0- 0 2 30.9 --- --- 0.0 --- -
GQQIISES 7. OF cum. cv
28 102.5 101.6 106.2 5.0 5.2 3.7
INTERNATIONAL MINERALS
8 CHEMICAL CORP.
Cincinnati, Ohio 0-20-20 2 --- 20.5 19.4 --- 7.5 0.
0-25-25 2 --- 25.1 24.1 --— 2.2 1.1
4-12- 8 5 4.6 12.7 9.2 8.0 3.6 21.
5-10-15 26 5.2 10.2 15.5 6.3 3.4 3;
5-20-20 14 5.2 19.4 20.3 11.5 2.7 6.1
6- 6-18 3 5.4 6.7 16.9 15.1 16.1 8.5
6-12-12 5 6.2 12.4 12.4 3.6 9.0 2.3
6-12-18 6 5.8 12.7 19.3 4.0 4.7 2.9
8-32-16 3 7.9 29.7 15.5 2.1 1.9 6.1
10-10-10 16 10.2 10.9 10.8 3.3 7.7 6.9
12-12-12 6 12.0 12.4 12.6 2.2 3.7 4.4
GQEBES 1, OF cum. cv
95 102.3 100.7 103.5 6.2 5.3 5.v
Clarksville, Tcnn. 4-12- 8 2 4.7 12.0 9.1 16.7 1.7 10F
4-16- 4 2 2.7 10.4 8.7 13.3 4.0 18.
5-10-10 3 5.5 11.2 10.3 3.8 12.8 4.
5-10-15 3 5.5 10.3 15.6 7.3 1.6 lf
5-20-20 9 5.2 19.0 19.9 7.5 8.9 6.5
6-12-12 3 6.0 11.8 11.6 8.8 9.6 4.8
10-10-10 6 9.5 10.8 11.0 1.3 7.2 2.5
ALL
Z OF GUAR.
GRADES 36 101.3 97.4 103.3  

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, 1967 - JUNE, 1968 19
I Average Analysis and Coefficient of Variation of Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 1968
§ (Co¤t'd)
 
‘ • COMPANY AND PLANT GRADE SAgg£ES AVERAGE ANALYSIS c05§;§i;§g§ OF
INTERNATIONAL MINERALS
·\ & CHEMICAL CORP. (C0nt'd)
Somerset, Ky. O-20-20 3 --- 18.1 21.8 -—- 12.5 12.7
5-10-15 8 5.4 10.4 15.4 6.6 4.1 5.5
’ 5-20-20 5 5.4 19.7 20.0 8.0 2.2 2.4
6-12-12 5 6.4 12.3 12.8 7.9 1.8 2.9
6-12-18 3 6.3 12.8 18.2 4.7 2.7 0.9
10-10-10 7 10.1 10.8 11.1 5.9 9.1 8.0
’ 12-12-12 2 11.7 12.4 12.8 2.4 1.1 7.2
GgkgES Z OE GUAR. CV
0 42 103.9 100.0 103.4 6.2 4.9 5.6
KENTUCKY EERTILIZER
`H“ WORKS
Winchester, Ky. 4-16- 4 2 4.4 15.9 4.0 3.2 0.9 3.5
5-10-15 4 5.2 10.7 15.2 4.8 2.9 4.2
5-20-20 6 5.2 19.6 21.1 4.7 2.6 1.6
6- 6-18 6 6.4 6.5 18.0 5.7 4.6 2.6
8-10-15 3 8.2 10.3 15.1 1.4 2.4 2.3 .
10-10-10 7 9.6 10.8 11.2 4.5 5.0 4.5
12-12-12 2 12.6 11.9 12.1 0.5 1.2 2.3
ALL »
'ZOF cum. cv
’ GRADES 35 102.7 103.2103.7 3.9 3.1 3.0
MOBIL CHEMICAL C0.
, Richmond, Va. 0-20-20 4 --- 20.8 19.9 --- 4.4 5.2
- 0-46- 0 2 --- 47.8 --- --- 1.7 --- .
3-10-30 2 3.3 11.5 29.5 0.0 5.5 0.7
4-12- 8 17 4.7 12.6 9.8 10.5 6.1 9.2
5-10-15 12 5.3 10.6 15.6 6.2 5.1 5.1
5-10-15ME 2 5.4 10.4 15.3 13.0 8.8 3.7
5-20-20 32 5.4 20.0 20.2 5.6 4.7 5.1
5-20-ZOME 4 5.6 19.3 19.9 7.2 2.0 2.3
6-12-12 4 6.1 12.0 12.6 6.3 2.4 6.2
6-12-18 3 6.5 12.7 19.2 3.8 4.3 3.4
6-12-18ME 14 6.4 12.5 18.3 5.7 2.9 2.8
6-18-12 2 6.9 20.9 12.6 3.1 0.3 5.0
y 6-18-12ME 2 6.1 17.2 12.5 4.6 2.8 1.7
J 6-24-24 9 6.4 23.0 24.7 6.6 6.9 6.1
8-32-16 2 8.7 32.0 16.1 4.0 3.7 9.2
10-10-10 28 10.0 10.7 11.0 6.3 7.1 9.3
O
4

 20 REGULATORY BULLETIN 200
Average Analysis and Coefficient of Variation of Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 1968 3
(Cont'd) A·
N0. COEFFICIENT OF 5
COMPANY AND PLANT GRADE SAMQLES AVERAGE ANALYSIS VARIATION
1
MOBIL CHEMICAL C0.
Richmond, Va. (C0nt'd) 10-10-10ME 3 9.8 10.4 11.4 3.1 4.1 2.2 x
10-20-20 2 11.0 21.0 19.9 10.2 20.2 12.4
14-14-14 5 13.8 14.8 15.3 5.9 7.8 3.6_,·
15-15-15 2 14.4 15.8 14.7 6.8 10.3 0.1,
CQIBES m oy cuA  . cv '
167 103.7 102.8 104.7 6.3 5.5 5.4 e
NORTH AMERICAN FERTILIZER
COMPANY
Louisville, Ky. 0- 0-50 3 -—- --- 48.8 --- --- 4.1 1
0-20- 0 2 --- 20.1 --- -—- 1.7 ---
4-12- 8 9 5.3 11.8 10.8 32.4 6.5 27.4;
5-10-15 12 5.3 10.1 15.3 5.8 4.6 3.4
5-20-20 12 5.5 19.6 20.5 5.7 6.9 10.6
6-12-12 8 6.5 12.5 13.3 6.0 6.7 3.5
6-12-18 3 6.4 12.1 18.1 1.8 4.7 5.8
6-24-24 2 6.4 23.7 24.8 3.3 6.8 3.9
8-10-15 7 8.0 10.2 15.5 6.7 4.4 1.7
9- 9-17 2 9.4 9.0 17.0 2.2 15.0 8.7
10-10-10 19 10.1 10.4 11.8 3.8 4.5 6.8 4
30- 0- 0 3 31.5 --- --- 2.3 --- ---
82- 0- 0 2 82.0 --- --- 0.2 --- --- L
c
G§kEES Z OF GUAR. CV
104.3 100.6 106.5 7.4 5.9 8.1
OHIO VALLEY FERTILIZER, ·
INC.
Maysville, Ky. 5-10-10 2 5.7 10.0 10.4 8.7 1.4 2.7
5-10-15 2 5.6 10.5 15.0 3.8 6.7 8.9
5-10-20 2 5.3 10.5 18.9 5.3 0.7 8.6
5-20-20 2 5.1 18.8 20.1 0.0 12.0 12.6 ·
10-10-10 3 9.9 10.7 11.1 4.1 1.4 5.0
10-10-20 7 11.8 12.3 16.5 18.5 17.1 24.6
12-12-12 2 11.2 12.2 12.1 3.1 4.0 1.7 '
CQXEES Z OF GUAR. CV ·
' 30 110.9 105.8 92.7 7.5 7.2 10.7 _
E
B

 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER IN KENTUCKY, JULY, 1967 - JUNE, 1968 21
Average Analysis and Coefficient of Variation of Samples Analyzed, July, 1967 - June, 1968
g` (Cont'd) ·
G COMPANY AND PLANT GRADE SAE§LES AVERAGE ANALYSIS Cogiiiiiggg OF
ROYSTER COMPANY
f` Norfolk, Va. 0-20- 0 9 --- 19.8 --- —-- 1.9 -——
0-20-20 2 --- 18.7 21.1 --- 0.0 0.3
\ O-20-20ME 7 --- 20.1 20.9 --- 2.9 5.6
` Q 4-12- B 2 4.7 13.2 10.9 7.6 3.7 16.2
4-12- BME 8 4.4 12.5 9.5 7.5 2.4 4.8
4-16- 4 2 5.0 16.0 5.6 0.0 2.2 1.2
I 5-10-15 3 5.8 10.4 15.8 1.9 2.2 2.5
5-10-15ME 34 5.7 10.6 15.1 6.0 3.8 5.3
5-20-20 27 5.4 19.7 20.5 6.2 3.0 3.9
6- 6-18 2 6.4 6.9 17.7 4.4 3.1 3.1
g 6-12-12 5 6.7 12.3 12.7 9.0 3.5 3.5
6-12-12ME 22 6.6 12.4 12.7 5.7 4.0 3.9
6-12-18 2 6.4 12.6 18.2 3.3 0.5 0.4
Q 6-24-24 2 6.1 24.4 24.3 3.5 4.0 1.1
10-10-10 31 10.2 10.6 10.6 3.9 3.2 5.4
10-10-10ME 6 10.1 10.6 10.6 3.1 2.2 5.6
10-10-15 12 9.8 10.2 15.7 2.8 5.6 3.7
12-12-12 2 11.7 12.7 12.6 2.4 3.9 2.2
28- 0- 0 2 29.2 --- --- 0.2 --- ---
30- 0- 0 31.0 --- --- -—- 1.8 --- ---
g 33.5- 0- 0 2 35.0 --- --- 0.1 --- —--
82- 0- 0 5 82.0 --- --- 0.2 --- -—-
ALL
·. Gm,. @ cv _
208 102.0 104.1 4.2 3.1 4.3
SOUTHERN STATES COOP.,
INC.
Louisvil1e, Ky. 0- 0-50 3 --- --- 50.7 --- --- 1.4
0-20- 0 2 --- 19.9 --- --- 1.0 ---
0-20-20 8 --- 20.2 21.3 --- 2.3 2.7
0-46- 0 2 --- 47.0 —-- --- 2.2 ---
3-12-12 3 3.7 12.1 13.1 5.4 2.0 5.9
4-12- 8 7 4.3 11.5 8.8 4.1 2.4 3.2
4-16- 4 4 4.5 16.2 4.5 6.4 2.5 2.1
· 5-10-15 20 5.3 10.3 15.6 4.5 2.9 2.0
5-10-20 2 5.4 10.5 20.0 7.8 0.7 2.8
5-20-20 12 5.3 20.4 20.4 6.1 3.2 2.5
· 6- 6-18 2 6.2 6.4 18.2 1.1 3.3 0.7
6-12-12 11 6.5 12.4 12.5 4.3 2.3 3.1
8-10-15 9 8.4 10.4 15.8 2.7 2.6 1.9
10-10-10 15 10.4 10.4 10.4 4.3 3.9 4.3
30- 0- 0 3 30.5 --- --- 0.3 --- --—