University of Kentucky———C0llege of Agriculture . . . EXTENSION DIVISION THOMAS P. COOPER, Dean and Director . Circular No. 251 December, 1931 Published in connection with the agricultural extension work carried on by cooperation of the College oi Agriculture, University of Kentucky, _ with the U. Department of Agriculture, and distributed in further- ance of the work provided for in the Act of Congress of May S, 1914. Variation in the Butterfat Content of Milk and Cream By FORDYCE ELY Milk and cream are usually bought and sold on the basis of the percent of butter fat they contain. This is determined by the Babcock test,'a simple routine laboratory operation which when properly con- ducted offerswlittle opportunity for error. It is natural for variations to occur in the butterfat content of milk from a herd of dairy cows. Frequently dairymen fail to realize that certain conditions normally tend to increase or decrease the butterfat content of milk and cream. Failure to recognize these con- - ditions often leads to a lack of confidence between buyer and seller and sometimes an unjustiiiedrchange inpatronage. The purpose of this circular is to explain some of the common causes of the varia- tions in the butterfat test of milk and cream. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE PERCENT OF BUTTERFAT IN MILK 1. The breed of the cows in the herd. Considerable variation exists in the percent of butterfat in the milk from cows of different dairy breeds. Usually Jersey milk is richest in butterfat and Holstein milk contains the least. The butterfatt coritcnt of the milk of tl1e leading dairy breeds ranks in the following order: Jersey, Guernsey, Ayrshire and Holstein. In the amount of milk produced usually the ranking is exactly reversed. Therefore, little difference exists between the breeds in butterfat production. Obviously, if a number of Jersey cows are added to a herd the butterfat test of the milk produced will have a tendency to rise, whereas, if Jersey cows are replaced Iby 1 Holsteins, a larger volume of milk of lower butterfat test will result. ‘ 2. The individual cow. It is the rule rather than the exception I \.· ___ _ _ _ {A