xt7h707wq857 https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7h707wq857/data/mets.xml University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate Kentucky University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate 1969-04-01  minutes 2004ua061 English   Property rights reside with the University of Kentucky. The University of Kentucky holds the copyright for materials created in the course of business by University of Kentucky employees. Copyright for all other materials has not been assigned to the University of Kentucky. For information about permission to reproduce or publish, please contact the Special Collections Research Center. University of Kentucky. University Senate (Faculty Senate) records Minutes (Records) Universities and colleges -- Faculty University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, April 1, 1969 text University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, April 1, 1969 1969 1969-04-01 2020 true xt7h707wq857 section xt7h707wq857    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Minutes of the University Senate, March 24, 1969 (Cont'd)

  
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
   
   

Dr. Adelstein resumed the Chair and further discussion of Article II A,
and B and C followed.

 

On behalf of the Senate Advisory Committee for Student Affairs Dr.
Adelstein presented a motion that the University Senate continue the meeting
until 5:30 p.m., adjourn until 7:30 p.m. and continue to 9:30 p.m. at which
time it adjourn until 4:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 25, adjourn at 5:30 p.m. and
reconvene at 7:30 p.m. and continue to 9:30 p.m., then reconvene again on 2
Tuesday, April 1, at 4:00 p.m. Following a second to this motion discussion [
followed out of which an amendment to the motion was presented that the Chair—
man be asked to decide a suitable meeting time not more than two weeks from the ,
present meeting or less than one week from the present meeting. The Senate ,
approved this amendment. The Senate then approved the original motion as %
amended.

Discussion of the Bill of Rights then continued to 5:34 p.m. when the ,
Senate adjourned to meet next at a time to be called by the Chairman to be ,
not more than two weeks nor less than one week from March 24th. Qaflml

‘ fl
\

Elbert W. Ockerman \?
Secretary

MINUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, APRIL 1, 1969

The University Senate met in special session at 3:00 p.m., Tuesday,
April 1, l969, in the Court Room of the Law Building. Chairman Ogletree (
presided. Members absent: Clifford Amyx, Charles Auvenshine*, Harry V. ?
Barnard, Norman E. Billups, Harold R. Binkley, Ben W. Black*, Gifford l
Blyton*, Frederick J. Bollum, Eugene B. Bradley, Wallace N. Briggs, William ‘
R. Brown, C. Frank Buck*, Virgil L. Christian, David B. Clark*, Robert L. ¥
Cosgriff, Emmett R. Costich*, Eugene C. Crawford*, George F. Crewe, M. Ward
Crowe*, W. C. DeMarcus, Stephen Diachun*, Henry F. Dobyns, John P. Drysdale, {
Louis D. Dubilier*, Phillip A. Duncan, W. G. Duncan, W. W. Ecton*, Roger .
Eichhorn*, Robert 0. Evans*, Thomas R. Ford, Eugene B. Gallagher*, Art
Gallaher*, Jess L. Gardner, Wesley P. Garrigus, Milton E. Gellin*, James L.
Gibson, Anna M. Gorman*, Joseph J. Gruber*, Holman Hamilton*, Omer Hamlin,
Rebekah Harleston*, A. J. Hiatt, Meryle Hutchison, Donald W. Ivey*, Robert
D. Jacobs*, Don R. Jacobson, Mary F. James, Catherine Katterjohn*, John E.
Kennedy, James B. Kincheloe*, Robert W. Kiser, Aimo Kiviniemi*, John A.
Koepke*, James F. Lafferty*, Nancy Lair*, Carl E. Langenhop, John F. Lienhard,
C. Oran Little*, James W. Little, L. Mae McPhetridge*, John L. Madden, Ray
Marshall*, Gene L. Mason*, William G. Moody*, Arthur K. Moore, James T. Moore, ;
Dean H. Morrow? Vernon A. Musselman, Jacqueline Noonan*, Horace A. Norrell*,
Louis A. Norton*, Harold F. Parks*, Bobby C. Pass*, J. W. Patterson, Ronald
E. Phillips, James Prestridge*, William R. Proffit, Stephen Puckette, John L. * ‘
Ragland, J. G. Rodriguez, Robert W. Rudd, Myron G. Sandifer, Gerard E. Silberstein,
Robert H. Spedding*, K. M. Stevens*, Norman L. Taylor, W. C. Templeton*,

Sidney Ulmer*, Daniel L. Weiss, D. R. Wekstein*, James H. Wells, David C.
White", Martin M. White*, Raymond A. Wilkie, Fred Zechman, Claudia Wells*, fl"
“W

 

Annie R. Brownlie*, Alfred Hu*, Lawrence S. Thompson*, Robert L. Lester*,
John W. Schaefer, Ralph Shabetai, William A. Gordon, Michael L. Furcolow,
Herbert Greene, Richard P. O'Neill, J. W. Roddick*, A. D. Albright, William
R. Willard*, Glenwood L. Creech, Lewis W. Cochran, Lawrence A. Allen, Harry
M. Bohannan, Leonard V- Packett*, Marcia A. Dake, George W. Denemark, Robert

*Absence excused

    
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
  
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
  
 
   
  
   

Minutes of the University Senate, April 1, 1969 (Cont'd)

M. Drake, Jr., Harold D. Gordon, Jack B. Hall, Joseph Hamburg, Ellis F.
Hartford, Charles F. Haywood, Raymon D. Johnson*, William S. Jordan*, Paul

gfifiah C. Nagel, J. P. Noffsinger, Howard C. Parker*, Doris M. Seward, John L.
‘J$.;' Sutton, Joseph V. Swintosky*, Wallace Bryan, John C. Robertson*, Robert F. 1
Kerley.

The Senate approved the request of Mary Angela Mueller of the Kernel
to attend the meeting.

, Dr. Adelstein assumed the chair to continue discussion of the proposed ‘1
Student Bill of Rights and recognized Dr. Stuart Forth, Acting Vice President :
‘ for Student Affairs. Dr. Forth read the following statement concerning the
proposed Bill before the Senate for discussion and asked that it be made a
matter of record in the minutes. ‘

 

l. The Student Bill of Rights is only partly that. It is also an
‘ administrative document which suggests, as it is presently pro—
: posed, that an ombudsman is necessary for the protection of
gain. these rights. The whole concept of a university ombudsman is
' one which, in effect, will arouse expectations of action, 11:.
assistance, and effectiveness which will not be fulfilled. It I

Will: 1‘ if)

 

a. Create yet another officer to whom students will be
referred and who may or may not be able to help him.

l b. Establish a curious three—way relationship with the
President as the apex and make him, in effect, the 3
( student affairs man on campus.

 

c. Be dependent on a weak reed who will not know upon M
the basis of day—to—day work over a period of years } M
what student problems are likely to be, what 301— 1‘?
utions are possible, or even, whom to see for help. ‘7:

staff intimately involved with students on a con—

; tinuing day-to—day basis. The structured experience
( of the classroom, the library, and the research .fl
laboratory does not provide even the most sensitive "
and carefully selected ombudsman with the kind of i’
knowledge of a student's non—academic problems he

’ needs to be effective.

 

d. Related to this is the fact that he will not have a ‘
1‘

T 2. The effect of this total document, since it has become an adminis—
/ trative instrument as well as a statement of principles, is to
expect the Office of Student Affairs to have major responsibilities
* f for student life —— for which it was created in 1966 —— without the «A

authority to implement its program. }

r 3. I would remind you that we are concerned with m0st aspects of student

m life —— intramurals, residence halls, counseling and testing, place—
WW‘ ment, the Student Center, student programs and activities, and student
t discipline —— and that an enthusiastic and experienced staff devote

all their time to this work. It is not an area in which amateurs

can lightly tread with any degree of effectiveness.

*Absence excused

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes of the University Senate, April I, 1969 (Cont'd)

4. The document in_toto —— and again, it has become an administrative
document, not a general statement of the principles to which we all
subscribe —— is a strong assertion of "no-confidence" in a total
student affairs office which has been successful in relating to
students, in working for their general welfare, and even, albeit
with proper reluctance, in their relations to some academic
situations. It also implies that our faculty have become so
irresponsible in their academic dealings with students that a
special officer is necessary to handle the problems this has
created.

5. My feeling is that, as we discuss each minor point, the Senate is
involving itself more and more in purely administrative matters
which the faculty as a whole are not interested in working with.
The Senate, if it adopts this as it stands, will have assumed
authority in non—academic student personnel work delegated by
the Trustees and the President to the Office of Student Affairs.

I should note, too, that the Senate Committee on Student Affairs,
as an advisory committee, has gradually come to be a policy—
making group -— if this statement is adopted as it is —— without
a sufficient or sophisticated awareness of what this means to
the University community.

6. Most important of all, having had my day in court, I want to re—
assert that I and my entire staff are in agreement with the idea
that principles of students rights can and should be promulgated.
Such a statement can be of positive value in the work of the
University community with students but the document must, in my
thinking, stick to just that —— a statement of principles which
has the support of the whole University community. The faculty
should concern itself with these principles, and it should remain
the responsiblility of the President and Student Affairs to see
that they are implemented.

Extensive discussions of Article II, D, Article III, A, and Section I,
the University Ombudsman, were held until 5:23 p.m. when the Senate re—
cessed until 7:30 p.m.

The Senate reconvened at 7:30 p.m. with the Acting Chairman, Dr. William
K. Plucknett, presiding. Members absent: Clifford Amyx, Charles Auvenshine*,
Harry V. Barnard, Wendell E. Beals, Norman F. Billups, Harold R. Binkley, Ben
W. Black*, F. J. Bollum, Eugene B. Bradley, Wallace N. Briggs, Herbert Bruce,
C. Frank Buck*, Jacqueline Bull, W. Merle Carter, Virgil L. Christian, Jr.,
David B. Clark*, Maurice A. Clay, Arthur L. Cooke, Robert L. Cosgriff, Emmett
R. Costich*, Alfred L. Crabb, Jr.*, Robert J. DeAngelis, Wendell C. DeMarcus,
Loretta Denman*, Stephen Diachun*, D. F. Diedrich, Henry F. Dobyns, Richard M.
Doughty, John P. Drysdale, Louis D. Dubilier*, Phillip A. Duncan, W. G. Duncan,
W. W. Ecton*, Fred Edmonds, Roger Eichhorn*, Joseph Engelberg, Frank J. Essene,
Robert 0. Evans*, Thomas R. Ford, Eugene B. Gallagher*, Art
Gallaher*, Jess L. Gardner, W. P. Garrigus, Milton E. Gellin*, James L. Gibson,
Will D. Gilliam, Jr., Anna M. Gorman*, Joseph J. Gruber*, Holman Hamilton*,
Omer Hamlin, Rebekah Harleston*, Robert D. Haun, Virgil W. Hays, A. J. Hiatt,
James F. Hopkins, Meryle Hutchison, Robert D. Jacobs*, Don R. Jacobson,
William H. Jansen, Catherine Katterjohn*, James D. Kemp, John E. Kennedy, James
B. Kincheloe*, Robert W. Kiser, Aimo Kiviniemi*, John A. Koepke*, Robert A.

*Absence excused

 

 

  

  
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
  
 
 
 
  
   
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 
    

V‘ - —..~A\ ,7

f

  

 

(Cont'd)

    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
    

Minutes of the University Senate, April 1, 1969

Kuehne, James F. Lafferty*, Nancy Lair*, Carl E. Langenhop, Walter G. Langlois,
Harold R. Laswell, Robert Lauderdale, Jr., Donald C. Leigh, Albert S. Levy,
John F. Lienhard, C. Oran Little*, James W. Little, George L. Luster, Marcus T.
McEllistrem, Michael P. McQuillen*, John L. Madden, M. K. Marshall, Ray
Marshall*, Gene L. Mason*, William G. Moody, Arthur K. Moore, James T. Moore,
Dean H. Morrow, Vernon A. Musselman, Jacqueline A. Noonan*, Horace A. Norrell*,
Louis A. Norton*, Blaine F. Parker, Harold F. Parks*, Bobby C. Pass*, J. W.
Patterson, Ronald E. Phillips, James Prestridge*, William R. Proffit, Stephen
Puckette, John L. Ragland, Daniel R. Reedy, Donald A. Ringe, Thurlow R. Robe,
Sheldon Rovin, Robert W. Rudd, Myron G. Sandifer, Donald E. Sands, George W.
Schwert, Robert A. Sedler, Gerard E. Silberstein*, C. Leland Smith, Emily V.
Smith, Robert H. Spedding*, K. M. Stevens*, Willis A. Sutton, Jr., Norman L.
Taylor, Timothy H. Taylor, W. C. Templeton*, Richard Thurston, Sidney Ulmer*,
Harwin L. Voss, William S. Ward, Gilbert T. Webster, Daniel L. Weiss, D. R.
Wekstein*, James H. Wells, David C. White*, Martin M. White*, Raymond A. Wilkie,
Charles G. Williamson, Jr., Fred Zechman, Cecil Bull, Claudia Wells*, Annie R.
Brownlie*, Alfred Hu*, Lawrence S. Thompson, Hans Gesund, Robert L. Lester*,
John W. Schaefer, Ralph Shabetai, William A. Gordon, Michael L. Furcolow, Herbert
Greene, Richard P. O'Neill, A. D. Kirwan, A. D. Albright, William R. Willard*,
Robert F. Kerley, Glenwood L. Creech, Lewis W. Cochran, Lawrence A. Allen,
Harry M. Bohannan, Leonard V. Packett*, Marcia A. Dake, George W. Denemark,

R. M. Drake, Jr., Harold D. Gordon, Jack B. Hall, Joseph Hamburg, Ellis F.
Hartford, Charles F. Haywood, Raymon D. Johnson*, William S. Jordan, Jr.*,
William L. Matthews, Jr., Paul C. Nagel, J. P. Noffsinger, Elbert W. Ockerman*,
Howard C. Parker*, Doris M. Seward, John L. Sutton, Joseph V. Swintosky*,
Wallace Bryan, Sheryl Snyder, Winston E. Miller, John C. Robertson*.

Dr. Plucknett turned the meeting over to Dr. Adelstein for resumption of
discussion of the Student Bill of Rights. Extensive discussion of Article III,
B, C, D, E, Article IV, A, C, and further discussion of Section I, the
University Ombudsman, continued. In the discussion of Article IV, C, Right
to a Free Student Press, a member of the Senate Advisory Committee on Student

Affairs, presented a minority report as follows which he requested be included:

The student body has the right to a student newspaper that is free
to publish news of general interest.

The Senate voted informally to include this minority report in Article IV, C and
Dr. Adelstein indicated that it would be in the Bill of Rights when it is returned
to the floor of the Senate for final consideration.

The Senate continued discussion to 9:37 p.m. when it recessed to meet again
at 4:00 p.m., Wednesday, April 2, 1969.

The Senate reconvened at 4:05 p.m., Wednesday, April 2, 1969, in the Court
Room of the Law Building. Chairman Ogletree presided. Members absent: Clifford
Amyx, Charles Auvenshine*, Harry V. Barnard, Harold R. Binkley, Ben W. Black*,
Frederick J. Bollum, Eugene B. Bradley, Wallace N. Briggs, William R. Brown,
Herbert Bruce, C. Frank Buck*, W. Merle Carter, Richard A. Chapman, Virgil L.
Christian, Jr., David B. Clark*, Carl B. Cone*, Arthur L. Cooke, Robert L.
Cosgriff, Emmett R. Costich*, Robert J. DeAngelis, Wendell C. DeMarcus, Loretta
Denman*, Henry F. Dobyns, Louis D. Dubilier*, Phillip A. Duncan, W. G. Duncan,
W. W. Ecton*, Fred Edmonds*, Frank J. Essene, Robert 0. Evans, Joseph B. Fugate,
Eugene B. Gallagher*, Art Gallaher*, Milton E. Gellin, James L. Gibson, Anna M.
Gorman*, Joseph J. Gruber*, Holman Hamilton*, Omer Hamlin, Virgil W. Hays, A. J.

*Absence excused

    

 

 

  
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
   
   
  
 
  
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

(Cont'd)

  

Minutes of the University Senate, April 1, 1969

Hiatt, Meryle Hutchison, Donald W. Ivey*, Robert D. Jacobs, Don R. Jacobson,
William H. Jansen, Catherine Katterjohn*, James D. Kemp, James B. Kincheloe*,
Robert W. Kiser, John A. Koepke*, R. A. Kuehne, Nancy Lair*, Carl E. LangenhOp,
Walter G. Langlois, Harold R. Laswell, Robert Lauderdale, Jr., Albert S. Levy, v
John F. Lienhard, C. Oran Little*, James W. Little, George L. Luster, Marcus v
T. McEllistrem, John L. Madden, M. K. Marshall, Ray Marshall, Gene L. Mason, {
William G. Moody*, Arthur K. Moore, James T. Moore, Dean H. Morrow, V. A. L
Musselman, Vincent E. Nelson, Jacqueline A. Noonan*, Horace A. Norrell*, ‘
Louis A. Norton*, Blaine F. Parker, Harold F. Parks*, Bobby C. Pass*, Ronald {
E. Phillips, James Prestridge*, William R. Proffit, Stephen Puckette, John L. ,
Ragland, J. G. Rodriguez, Myron G. Sandifer, Gerard E. Silberstein*, C. Leland /
Smith, Robert H. Spedding, K. M. Stevens*, Paul Street*, Norman L. Taylor, i
Timothy H. Taylor, W. C. Templeton*, Richard Thurston, Duane N. Tweeddale*,
Sidney Ulmer*, Harwin L. Voss, William F. Wagner, Gilbert T. Webster, Daniel L. .
Weiss, D. R. Wekstein*, James H. Wells, David C. White*, Martin M. White*, !
Raymond A. Wilkie, Claudia Wells*, Annie R. Brownlie*, Alfred Hu, Lawrence S. /
Thompson, Robert L. Lester, John Schaefer, Ralph Shabetai, William A. Gordon, 3
Michael L. Furcolow, Herbert Greene, Richard P. O'Neill, J. W. Roddick*, V”
Albert D. Kirwan, A. D. Albright, William R. Willard, Robert F. Kerley, Glenwood $15”

I

l

)

f

(

i

 

L. Creech, Lewis W. Cochran, Lawrence A. Allen, Harry M. Bohannan, Leonard V.
Packett, Marcia A. Dake, George W. Denemark, R. M. Drake, Jr., Harold D. Gordon,
Jack E. Hall, Joseph Hamburg, Ellis F. Hartford, Charles F. Haywood, R. D.
Johnson, William S. Jordan, Jr.*, William L. Matthews, Jr., Paul C. Nagel,

J. P. Noffsinger, Elbert W. Ockerman*, Howard C. Parker, John L. Sutton,

Joseph V. Swintosky*, Wallace Bryan, Sheryl Snyder, Winston E. Miller, John C.
Robertson*.

The Senate approved the requests of Michael Farmer, former Student Government §
ombudsman, and Dana Ewell of the Kernel, to sit in the meeting.

Dr. Adelstein assumed the chair to continue discussion of the Bill of Rights
The Senate completed its discussion at 5:05 p.m. and Dr. Adelstein announced that
the Committee would like to retire for a period of review and incorporation of
many of the suggestions that have been made in this series of discussions and
to bring back to the Senate a final document for recommendation of its adoption.

Chairman Ogletree announced that the next meeting of the Senate would be
the regular meeting of April 14 at which the annual reports of the standing f
committees of the Senate would be presented as well as a recommendation from L
the Rules Committee regarding the registration of freshmen and sophomores in ’
colleges other than Arts and Sciences. He announced further that a special
meeting of the University Senate would be held at 4:00 p.m., Thursday, April 24, ~
1969, to approve candidates for May degrees and to bring the revised Student Bill I
of Rights before the Senate for final consideration.

 

The Senate adjourned at 5:10 p.m.

Elbert W. Ockerman T
Secretary :

 

    

excused

 

*Absence

 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
Lexington

Nhroh 25, 1969

TO MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE

As directed by the University Senate at its meeting of
March 24th the Chairman of the Senate Council is calling a
meeting of the University Senate for 5:00 p.m., Tuesday,
April 1, 1969, in the Court Room of the Law Building. This
meeting will recess at 5:30 p.m. and reconvene at 7:30 p.m.
If consideration of the proposed Student Bill of Rights has
not been completed at the close of that meeting, the Senate
will again meet the following day, Wednesday, April 2, at 4:00 p.m.,
adjourn at 5:50 p.m. and, if necessary, reconvene at 7:30 that

evening.
@6145 W. OofierM

Secretary

 

 NEWS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY

Public Relations Department

For release upon receipt

The University of Kentucky is in the process of adding a student bill of

rights to its student code which was adopted in 1967.

The document is being debated in the UK Senate-~item by item-~in weekly

meetings.

Three principal features are evident in the bill: (l) giving the student
recourse in meeting what he thinks has been an unjust decision by an administra-
tor or a faculty member, (2) establishing an office of ombudsman, a spokesman
to whom students can appeal for assistance on matters pertaining to the stu-
dents‘ rights, (3) placing in writing many provisions heretofore understood, or
implied, so that students would be better informed about them.

Work on the Bill of Rights began in the summer of 1967 shortly after the
student code was adopted. The bill is a supplement to the code. It is com—
posed of an introduction, a preamble and four articles. Each of the articles
is sub-divided into alphabetical designations...A,B,C, and D.

Article I is entitled Right of Admission and Access. It bans discrimina~
tion in admission policy, scholarships, grants—in-aid, and financial aid;
guarantees the student's right to use facilities and services at UK; and pro-
vides that "a student has the right to expect the University to exert its in-
fluence both on campus and in the community to eliminate discrimination on the

basis of race, religion, color or national origin."

 

 Prof. Paul Oberst of the UK College of Law has noted that exerting such
influence is part of the University's responsibility, since "the governor has

issued a statement asking all state agencies to utilize whatever power they

possess to eliminate discrimination."

The new provision of the bill is Article II, known as Rights in the Class-
room. It provides that a student shall have the right to know the content and
standards of a course, to take a ”reasoned exception" to the teacher's views
without suffering penalty, and to receive a grade based only upon a fair and
just evaluation of his performance. This article was deemed a solution to
those relatively few instances where professors have been hostile toward par-
ticular students for petty or personal reasons.

Right of privacy is guaranteed in Article III. It bans unreasonable in-
trusions upon the student, illegal search and seizure, and grants the student
the right to have his academic, COunseling and disciplinary records held con-
fidential unless he gives his written premission. The artickeoalso stipulates
that ”a student has the right to have his character evaluated only by individ-

ual with a personal knowledge of him."

Exceptions to the disciplinary, academ—*
ic and counseling records are granted when "the information is required by
authorized University personnel for official use."

Article IV is entitled Right to Learn. It grants freedom of speech, in-
cluding peaceful picketing, the right (to registered student groups) to invite
and hear guest speakers, and the right to a free student press. Section I of
Article IV provides for the appointment of an ombudsman who will hear griev-

cances, report directly to the president any significant problems, recommend

policies, and submit an annual report to the UK Senate Council.

(more)

 

 Section II of the article encompasses the Student Rights Board, to be
formed on the same basis as the present University Appeals Board, which is

composed of three student representatives and six faculty members.

Under the heading of jurisdiction, the section states that "the Student

Rights Board shall have jurisdiction over all cases involving violations of
rights provided students in this document." Authority is given to deal with any
violations as stipulated in the Bill of Rights.

The document was formulated by the University Senate Advisory Committee
for Student Affairs. Faculty members are: Michael E. Adelstein, chairman;
Robert G. Lawson; James D. Kemp; Richard Hanau; Ellwood Hammaher; Charles
Dickens; Thomas Olshewsky, and Raymond Wilkie. Student members are Taft Mc—
Kinstry, Winston Miller, Sheryl Snyder, and O. K. Curry.

Earlier consideration by the UK Senate included approval of two additional
disciplinary offenses to the student code.. They were unauthorized interference
with University activities or preventing passage in or out of buildings, and
forging, altering or falsifying official University records or documents. A
previous report that these two provisions received an affirmative vote by a
narrow margin was in error, Chariman Adelstein noted. He said the vote was
nearly unanimous. The split vote was on the particular wording of a sentence

in the Bill of Rights, not in the disciplinary offenses, he said.

Wadi/it