xt7kh12v7319 https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7kh12v7319/data/mets.xml The Kentucky Kernel Kentucky -- Lexington The Kentucky Kernel 1974-10-17 Earlier Titles: Idea of University of Kentucky, The State College Cadet newspapers  English   Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. The Kentucky Kernel  The Kentucky Kernel, October 17, 1974 text The Kentucky Kernel, October 17, 1974 1974 1974-10-17 2020 true xt7kh12v7319 section xt7kh12v7319 Vol. LXVI No. 51
Thursday, October 17. 1974

KENTUCKY

an independent student newspaper J

Schorr calls for nation
to face up to Watergate

Hy mu. S'l‘RAl’B
Kernel Staff Writer

CBS News Correspondent Daniel Schoor
told a crowd of about 1,500 people last night
the nation will not solve problems arising
out of the Watergate scandal until people
face up to the “nightmare“.

In an impromptu speech at Memorial
Coliseum, Schorr said the Watergate
chapter of American History books is not
yet closed.

“I‘VE BEEN wallowing in Watergate
for two years now." Schorr said. “I don‘t
think I'm finished wallowing The chapter
of Watergate isn't closed. President
ttleraldl Ford said it is a nightmare he'd
like to put behind us. and yet the feeling
grows this nightmare can't be ended until
we face the nightmare and face what it is
in every detail."

Schorr covered the Watergate scandel
for CBS since the conslusion of the 1972
political conventions. He received an
Emmy Award; television‘s highest honor,
in 1973 for a two-part series aired on the
CBS Evening News entitled “The
Watergate Affair." Schorr‘s persistant
investigations have earned him the
reputation as one of the best reporters on
the Watergate subject

The veteran newsman said there are
three questions that sum up his entire
experience with Watergate: What made
Watergate unique in American History?
Why did justice fail? Can the role of the
press in Watergate be justified?

“IN THE spring of 1972. the thing most
commonly said around this country was,
‘Watergate wasn‘t different from the kind
of dirty tricks people played on each other

Kane' statt photo by Stuart flowman

Fall fishin'

Although yesterday had a drab.
cloudy beginning. skies cleared
enough for Mr. Yellman to enjoy
some late afternoon fishing at
Lakeside Country Club.

during political campaigns.’ It was very
difficult to get the audience to perceive
that Watergate was not just another kind
of dirty trick but that there was something
quite unique about it." Schorr said.

It is one simple word that differentiates
Watergate from the rest, Schorr said. tt
was the first time the word “enemies" was
used in a political discourse.

“The word enemy means somebody or
something that presents a threat to your
entire system or even your life,“ Schorr
said. “Never before did we have an
administration that was made of people
that were so ideologically alike. Not only
did they try to beat people in elections but
they tried to take hold of the government
and reshape it in their own image."

NIXON‘S ADMINISTRATION. accord-
ing to Schorr. acted like they were “under
seige“ along with being suspicious and
baleful. An enemy to Nixon and his
cohorts could be someone who made a
donation to the opposition party, someone
who refused to supply the administration
with Internal Revenue Service informa-
tion to use against other enemies or any
newsmen. Schorr said.

“The suggestion that there are people
around who are not only against you but
are people who must be destroyed
represents a current of American life
which I had never known before and wish
never to see again." Schorr said. “That is
why I feel once you understand the use of
the word “enemy" you can understand
everything else that went along with it."

The stocky, grey-haired reporter knows
something about White House enemies.
He was included on a list of administration

DANlI-Il. SCHORR

enemies that was uncovered during the
Watergate investigations. He was also
investigated by the FBI under strict orders
from the White House. When this
investigation was uncovered the
administration claimed it was reviewing
him for a prospective job.

TRIALS 0F those involved in the
Watergate cover-up have been shunted off
until two years after the incident, Schorr
said, because those whose duty ist was to
see that justice be done were those that
were involved.

“Justice fails when those you entrust in
carrying out and enforcing justice are the
very ones who corrupt the process,“
Schorr said.

I unlimieil on page l2

Women in law
Number of women students increases,

but first year enrollment declines

By NANCY DALY
Kernel Staff Writer

The number of women in the College of
Law has increased over the past year. but
the first-year female enrollment has
declined considerably.

The total percentage of women law
students rose from 15 per cent in 1973-74 to
19 per cent this year. But only 17 per cent
of this year's first-yearclass are women as
compared with 25 per cent last year.

JOSEPH W. RAl'SCll. assistant dean in
the College of Law. said they originally
accepted 49 of 135 women who applied for
this year‘s first-year class. but about 20
eventually chose not to attend law school.

Rausch said today's recruitment
workshop for female law students was
designed to fill in the gap between the
number of women in undergraduate
programs and law school. “The total
number of female applicants tends to be
abnormally low in relation to their
proportion in the undergraduate level." be
said.

The recruitment workshop is being held
911.111.4pm .today in Student (‘enter room
206 and is co-sponsored by the College of
Law and the Women‘s Law Caucus.
Members of the caucus will be on hand to
answer questions about applying to law
school.

NitTlthALLY. MORE women are
attending law school than at any previous
time. a source in the American Bar
Association (ABA) said. The number of
women law students tripled over a ten-
year span from four per cent in 1963 to 12
per cent in 1973. according to ABA
statistics,

ABA also reports dramatic increases in
the enrollment of women in first-year
classes. which rose 35 per cent between
1972 and 1973. Twenty per cent of
first-year students were women in 1973,
which placed UK above the national
average with 25 per cent.

But the total percentage of women
lawyers in the US. has hovered around
three per cent for Several years. an ABA
spokesperson said.

PAM HAM. a third-year law student
and member of the Women's Law Caucus.
said glowing reports of the increase of
women in law school are misleading.

“()bviously the increase in the number
of women entering the field of law is
gratifying.“ said Elam. ”But it‘s not
surprising because you have to go up when
you start from zero." She said until recent
years many law schools refused to admit
women.

Elam attributes the increases to the
the women's movement.
becoming increasingly

growth of
“Women are

University of Kentucky

Lexington. Ky. 40506

Blacks face
unwelcome
atmosphere

By LYN HACKER
Kernel Staff Writer

The main problem that blacks face at
UK is an unwelcome atmosphere, Victor
Gaines told the Senate Council
Wednesday.

Gaines, former special assistant to
President Otis A. Singletary is the author
of the Report on the Inventory of Minority
Students at UK released October third.

GAINES SAID the atmosphere problem
could be resolved if there were more
blacks on campus.

“Blacks don't necessarily want to be
separatists, but the white intensity on
campus makes them feel uncomfortable.“
(taines said.

"Even though there are campus
organizations which try to reach out to
blacks. a lot of blacks don‘t feel
comfortable about going; even though the
whites have the best of intentions." he
said.

ALTHOl'GII HE didn't elaborate,
Gaines said one of the reasons blacks
chose smaller state colleges instead of UK
was because of UK's athletic program.

“It's been a big deterrent,“ he said.

Gaines also said black secondary
education in Kentucky was not the best
and it tended to leave black students ill—
prepared for UK academic activity.

BLACK STUDENTS don‘t feel
comfortable seeking help with their
studies because they think it will add to the
stereotype of the slow black learner, he
said,

Continued on Page 12

aware of their capabilities and
possibilities and are refusing to submit to
the limitations society places upon them.“

Tlll-Z YEAR-01.1) law caucus. which
consists of students and other women
involved with the legal profession. plans to
propose a course on women in the law and
send speakers to colleges throughout the
state for recruitment.

But Elam said their goals are not limited
to merely increasing female enrollment.

“Our purpose is not just to accept
conditions the way they are and to
perpetuate the status quo and fit women
into a male-dominated structure." said
Elam, ”The purpose is to change
conditions so all people will have an
opportunity to go as far as their talents and
ambitions will take them to create a
more humanistic famework for the law
and for society.”

The law caucus also plans to lobby for
more female faculty and staff members. of
which there is only one at present.

"We are eager to increase female
representation on the faculty,“ said
llausch He said law school administrators
will attend an American Association of
Law Schools recrmting conference over
Thanksgiving to select new faculty
members

 

    
    
  
  
  
   
    
    
   
   
    
   
   
   
  
   
   
  
  
   
  
    
   
      
   
  
   
     
   
 
  

Editor-incniet, Linda Carnes
Managing editor. Ron Mitdiett
Associate editor, Tom Moore

' Editorial page editor, Dan Crutcner

Features edlor, Larry Mead
Arts editor. Greg Hotelicn
Sports editor. Jim Mauoni
Photography editor. Ed Gerald

Editorials represent the opinions of the editors. not the University

  

editorials

Rockefeller gifts: buying political power

Submitting a nomination to
Congress is full of political perils for
any President, especially when the
nomination is for vice-president of the
United States.

The man now coveting such
presidential propinquity appeared
headed for an easy confirmation until
recently.

The drive to confirm former New
York Governor Nelson Rockefeller as
vice-president is in trouble and
rightly so. Recent disclosures reveal
that Rockefeller has handed out
nearly $2 million in gifts and loans to
political friends in the past seventeen
years and may have had a part in
underwriting an unflattering book
about his opponent. Arthur Goldberg.
in the 1970 gubernatorial campaign.

The series of gifts and loans
reaffirms Rockefeller‘s image as a
wealthy aristocrat who uses money to
buy his political future. Prominent
among these gifts were a $50000
hand-out to Secretary of State Henry
Kissinger (just before Kissinger left
Rockefeller's staff to join the Nixon
Administration) and a recent $15,000
contribution to Senator Jacob Javits‘
1974 re-election campaign. Javits is
now in a position to vote on
Rockefeller's confirmation which
seems a blatant conflict of interest.
We wonder, also. how much influence
a grateful Kissinger may have
exerted in Ford‘s decision to

nominate Rockefeller for vice-
president.

The.fabled Rockefeller family
wealth arouses issues far beyond the
granting of gifts and loans. It seems
absurd to think that international
business interests would not influence
Rockefeller‘s foreign policy views.

Another damning element in
Rockefeller‘s bid to become vice
president is the disclosure that John
A. Wells. Rockefeller‘s former
presidential campaign manager and
political confidant. recruited Victor
Lasky to write a biography of former
Supreme Court Justice Arthur
Goldberg to be distributed as
campaign material in the 1970 New
York gubernatorial race. The book.
Arthur J. Goldberg. the Old and the
New, was described as
“pornographic" by Goldberg.
Rockefeller reported that his brother.
Laurance. had invested $60,000 in the
book as a "business venture.“ An FBI
report to a House committee
investigating the former governor
indicated that Rockefeller. through
intermediaries. may have been
involved in underwriting the book
Rockefeller issued an apology to
Goldberg. stating that he took full
responsibility for the book. but added
that he knew nothing of the incident at
the time it happened. However. the
ethical implications of this incident
are a serious stumbling block to any
man seeking the vice-presidency.

These recent revelations only serve
to point out once again that massive
wealth and political power all too
often go hand in hand. They have a
mutually symbiotic relationship, each
feeding off the other.

For this reason we are opposed to
the confirmation of Nelson
Rockefeller as vice—president. He
may be able to buy New York but we
hope he isn't able to buy the whole
United States.

Student loans available

While Gerry Ford continues to feed
the country with economic
marshmallows and tough turkey.
aiming to slow the pace of inflation,
students are watching huge chunks of
green lettuce disappear from their
pocketbooks to finance education
costs. The dinner is not pleasant.

The cost of higher education. for
some. is already too much. Others
will soon be priced out of the market if
they can‘t find an aid program to give
them a boost. And. because the
resources for student loans began to
dry up a few years ago. the hunt for
aid has been difficult. 'I‘emporarily.
however. some Kentucky students
may be in for a break.

It was recently reported that the
state cun'ently holds $080,000 for low
interest student loans. According to
Jim Tharp. director of loan programs
for the Kentucky Higher Education
Assistance Authority. this is enough
money to give partial aid to almost
1,000 students. Undergraduates that
have qualified for federal loans but

In reaction to “Fact

14. Kernel).

No, 3“
tComment by Donald Jones. Oct

haven‘t been able to secure them
from a bank are eligible to receive
this money. The interest rate is a low
seven per cent and repayment of the
loan won't begin until nine months
after the student graduates.

Other than receiving loans from
banks. (only First Security National
Bank and Trust to in Lexington
offers student loans), students can
turn to three sources on campus. Jim
tingle. campus director of student
financial aid. reports that funds are
still available through work-study.
Basic ()pportunity (irants and Loans.
and for cligiblestudents in the (‘ollege
of Nursing. Roth l‘Ingle a nd Tharp a re
willing to assist students now in
financial straits

Despite hearing from one I‘K
administrator that the campus tuition
of S240 is expected to remain stable
for the current biennium t through the
1075-70 school year). the overall cost
of education is sure to spiral upwards,
Students seeking aid should act now
before it‘s too late.

Letters to the editor

Guard rail saves life

Monday's Kernel. They probably
saved his life ashe would have hit
the concrete overpass supports
had the guard rails not been

 

 
 
 
  
   
   
  
   
  
 
  
       
       
  
  
   
    
  
  
    
  
   
      
   
    
   
  
  
 

 

Paroxysms of ennui

Marshmallow moderates melt political distinctions

By NICHOLAS VON HOFFMAN

WASHINGTON — The paro—
ysms of ennui with which the
public has responded to this
1r ar’s elections have stirred both
' .nticians and political writers to

.ent anew the decomposition
of the two-party system. The
atomization of our politics, which
tends to make very candidate his
or her own political party.
depresses men like David S.
Broder. the country's most
widely respected political
analyst.

In a recent column Broder
remarked that when you have no
party discipline the way is open
for candidates with personal

political organizations to repeat
what the Nixon people did with
CREEP. He then went on to
regret that recent legislative
efforts to strengthen party
structure have failed. essentially
because only a rapidly diminish-
ing few give a damn about
whether there is or isn’t a
Republican or Democratic party.
Indeed the question is no longer
whether most people are becom-
ing independents but whether
they will vote at all. “Why should
lgo down to the polling place and
help them weave a rope for my
own noose?“ asks a California
voter, and she‘s not alone.

In the face of this. no

formalistic effort to legislate
strength back into the two-party

system is going to work. The
parties weren’t formed as the

result of the passage of laws in
the first place. They were formed
by men who banded together out
of a common interest and belief.
They had substantive content,
and it was one that was
recognized, however crudely. by
the entire electorate. But today
who would seriously assert that
the Republicans are the party of
the rich and the Democrats are
that of the workingman?

Only a ('ultural Stance

The only important division

Why should you say that the
new guard rails on the Bluegrass
Parkway are another “highway
department boondoggle'?" The
guard rails were engineered and
constructed for one purpose , to
save lives.

Only last week a close friend of
mine fell asleep while driving and
banged his car against one of the
guard rails you wrote of in

we’re left wrth is between
“conservatives" and "liberals,"
and that too has lost almost all
meaning. Those labels reflect
little more than a cultural stance.

What‘s a conservative? A chap
with a gruff vorce and an
American flag button on one lapel
and a WIN button on the other. He
has a public aversion to dirty
books and homosexuality and.
while he may detest what he calls
welfare programs. he loves
armament programs.

What's a liberal? He‘s a chap
who used to be for busing and who
puts protein dressing on his
slightly longer hair to puff it up

 

there.

l feel this example justifies the
expenditure by the Ford
administration for construction
of the guard rails and points out
that you (and others) are rather
hasty in your unsupported
generalizations about Governor
Ford.

Mark R. Mathis
Business Admin. senior

and give himself the dry look. He
didn‘t like the war in Vietnam,
but you might just sell him one in
the Middle East.

If that is the spectrum of
electoral politics. it follows that
parties are without meaning and
candidates are mostly vacuous
marshmallows. ()n the other
hand, we‘ve brought much of this
on ourselves by accepting the
idea that the summum bonum of
political personality is someone
who is regarded as a “respon
sible. reasonable, middleof—the-
road moderate.“ Any passion or
deeply fixed convictions are

Continued on Page 3

  

   

  

By BRUCE WINGES
With the objections raised‘ through the
“Letters to the Editor" over Ron
Mitchell’s Three Dog Night review
(Kernel, Oct. 14) one may wonder exactly
what music is and who has the right to tell
who what music is “good” or “bad”.

For one thing, music is an outlet through
which we may express our emotions.
People may enjoy music when they are
happy and may identify with sad
music—the blues, if you will—when they
are depressed.

MUSIC IS ALSO a medium through
which a musician may attempt to
communicate his feelings about a subject
to a listener. This was especially evident in
the 1960's with such songs as Stephen
Stills' “For What It‘s Worth.“

However, music is basically a value
judgement made by individuals Different
people enjoy different forms of music. This
is evident through Mitchell’s review. Some
people like Three Dog Night's music,
others do not.

This may also be proven by the existence
of numerous styles of music. From
classical, to easy listening, to jazz, to
Top40, to the more sophisticated forms of
rock‘n'roll, music offers something for
almost everyone.

SINCE MUSIC IS a value judgement and
since people have a diversity of musical
tastes, who is to be the final judge of what
constitutes “good“ or “bad" music?

A large part of this judgement of music
is left up to the critics. They tell us how
good a particular concert was. which

'Simply a falsehood'

Frank Zappa aficionado
mothers music critics

albums are worth buying. But a critic is
like everyone else. A critic has prejudices
toward music he enjoys and against music
he does not enjoy.

Because of this, the critic’s word should
not always be taken as the absolute truth.

Also, if someone likes an album, he wil
still like that album regardless of how a
critic treats it in a review. The individual
who enjoys the album may change his
image of the critic according to how the
critic reviews the album. But the
individual’s image of the album will
probably remain stable. So sometimes a
critic’s word is not taken for the absolute
truth anyway.

CRITICS SHOULD also be disregarded
when they attempt to criticize an area of
music they are unfamiliar with. For
example. I can tell you almost anything
you want to know about Frank Zappa and
his music. Because of this, I feel justified
in reviewing Zappa albums. I would not
feel justified in reviewing a Turtles album.
The reason for this is not because I despise
the Turtles, but because the only thing I
know about the Turtles is that Mark
Volman and Howard Kaylan (Flo and
Eddie) went from the Turtles to Zappa and
his Mothers.

But when a critic reviews an art form
(such as music) that is within his area of
knowledge, his criticism is valid. If for no
other reason, it is valid because the critic
has past performances or knowledge of
what should be in this area of art as a basis
for judgement.

A critic‘s word is also valid when he
stays away from absolute judgement of an
art form as being either good or bad, right

 

&_

or wrong, and merely attempts to report
the art form on such terms as technical
achievement or what an artist does at an
art event.

CRITICS MAY judge music in terms of
technical ability and creativity of the
particular artist. But people may be bored
with the complexities of Zappa‘s music
and thoroughly enjoy some of the less
complex and less creative music that is
presented on Top40 radio. To these people,
an artist‘s technical ability and creativity
may mean nothing—they know what they
enjoy and what they do not enjoy. And to
that individual a simple form of music is
good music. To others, it may not be so
good.

If the individual should take the critic’s
word or those who know the technical
aspects of music skeptically, then who

  
  
  
  
   
  
   
 
  
  
  
  
   
   
 
  
  
  
   
   
  
    
   
   
 
  
   
  
   
   
   
  
   
  
   
    
  
  
     

 

does have the final say of what constitutes
good or bad music? The answer to this is
that the individual is the final judge and
jury of the quality of music. The individual
should know what kind of music he enjoys
according to his own set of values. Since
individuals have different sets of values,
then each individual should have his own
type(s) or music which he enjoys.

ALSO. IF EACH individual judges music
according to his particular tastes, then he
has no right to degrade other individuals
because their tastes differ. And if an
individual enjoys a particular form of
music, then others have no right to tell him
he is wrong in doing so. By satisfying the
individual, music just may serve its main
purpose as an art form.

 

Bruce Winges is 3 Journalism junior.

Refutes ‘facts' about Jimm Creech case

By STOCKTON B. WOOD

I can't respond to charges —— is —- simply
I am not trying to play politics. rather. “facts" —one through six

bordering on libel.

a falsehood awarded.in competitive bidding, Creech. saying that it was

the contract. by the Nunn impossible to prove the guilt of

    

as Mr. Donald Jones obviously
was in the Oct. 14 Kernel, but I
feel l must accept his challenge
to examine the facts.

in Mr. Jones' article. and have no
wish to. if they are indeed facts.
However, I feel I must expose
“fact" number seven for what it

Point 1: Mr Jones says Jim
Creech was awarded 3160.000 for
moving office furntire.

Refutation: Mr. Creech was

Melting political distinctions

Continued from Page 2

taken to be signs of an unstable
fanaticism.

A recent Evans and Novak
column about Gary Hart. George
McGovern's 1972 campaign man-
ager, will serve as an example.
Hart is running for Senator in
Colorado, and our columnists
fear he wil win because he “is
abandoning abrasive liberal ideo-
logy for a bland moderate
facade.” while “rigidly doctrin-
airc liberals“ have captured the
state Democratic party because
in Colorado “as elsewhere liberal
fire-eaters are shielding their
ideological flames for this
election."

Abandoned Opinions

The unspoken word here is
“Communism.“ but since nobody
in his right mind can consider
Hart a Communist, what Mssrs.
Evans and Novak do is suggest

 

that he has the emotional makeup
of a Red —— “abrasive
ideology." “rigidly doctrinaire."
In other words, an irrational
devotee of a secular religion. We
can hardly be surprised that
reports from the state indicate
that Mr. Hart has done exactly
what the two columnists assert;
namely, pulled in his horns and
abandoned any opinions he might
have had to set him apart from
the 534 other Forgettables with
whom he may serve on Capitol
Hill.

The reverse side of the coin
Evans and Novak are flipping is
the unstated proposition that you
should only vote for people
without an “ideology." The
keystone of American ruling
class ideology is that we don‘t
have an ideology. But if you step
back a minute. it's obvious that
only political cretins don‘t have

  

one; that is. a framework of
values and beliefs.

The most irrational fanaticism
derives from denying the exis-
tence of one's own ideology. It
makes it impossible for people to
distinguish between subjective
and objective truth, or to
recognize our present state.
which an outsider can only
describe as middle-of»the-road
extremism. Having defined all
dissent as psychopathic. and with
the warm bodies of consensus
politics and non-ideological
rationalism surrounding us.
there’s no one and no thing to tell
us that the marshmallow moder-
ates are involving us in the most
horrendous kinds of folly.

Nicholas \‘on Hoffman is a
columnist for King Features
Syndicate.

 

administration (on Oct. 25, 1971)
not for $160000. but for what
amounted to $67.776.13.

Point 2: Mr. Jones says the
prosecutor was Atty. Gen. Ed
Hancock.

Ret‘utation: Special Prosecutor
Woodson T. Wood was named to
try the criminal case of Jimm
Creech.Wood. (father of this
writer). was the elected Presi-
dent of the Kentucky Common-
wealth Attorneys Association at
the time of his appointment. a
fact which underlines his inde~
pendence and competence.

Point 3: Mr. Jones says the
judge dismissed the case declar-
ing the prosecution had neglected
to make a thorough investigation.

Ret‘utation: In the criminal
trial of .limm (‘reech. Judge
Meigs stated that the Special
Prosecutor had tried the case
“ he very best he could with the
materials and evidence made
available to him" and that the
auditor working with the prose
cution did “the very level best
anyone could have done in
attempting to reconstruct long
after the fact records which were
furnished to him...,"

The Judge, however. dismissed
the criminal proceedings against

 

the defendant in such a
complicated case so long after
the fact (one and one-half years).
This is a far cry from Mr. Jones‘
contention that the judge
declared the prosecution had
neglected to make a thorough
investigation.

Point 4: Mr. Jones completely
ignored the civil suit against Mr.
Creech. which actually preceded
the criminal trial by a month. in
the same court with the same
judge presiding. In this case. the
company of which Jimm Creech
was vice-president (All-America
Movers. Inc.) was ordered to
repay the state $299.71'5.92. the
amount (out of a total state
payment of $367,493.05) which
was wrongfully paid to the
defendants as a result of their
fraudulent misrepresentations.

This is just a refutation of one
“fact“ presented as such to the
populace of this campus. I
sincerely hope that all future
commentaries in this newspaper.
regardless of which side of the
political spectrum they repre-
sent. will be researched before-
hand to insure their accuracy.

 

 

Stockton ll. Wood is a [5.0.5.

junior.

 

  
   
  
     
   
    
    
  
  
   
  
  
   
     
    
    
  
   
  
  
    
   
    
  
      
   
   
   

 I—TIIE KENTl't‘KY KERNI‘IL. Thursday. October l7. Itlil

GENERAL CINEMA conponAriom news briefs

n. ‘“‘“‘”°M‘“ n FAVETYEMALL I n rArsiuMAii

1W 77W 77 wen u . .
ON THE MALL mooousvmumwmuum mnousyiiiumwuuiilos F0 rd test If I e s to a y

HARIODSBUIG IOAD L tANI AHIN

. uncover mo “(an
lheres WEEK.

I‘mihigitme now ' one “0" "Demo! WASHINGTON (APir el)emocratic.meinbei's of the House
mOVle 0' SHOWING ' ' ’\ to cure mm '"M'M'me Judiciary subcommittee that will question PreSident Pord about
the year ' and '2: :32) “how,“ his pardon of Richard M. Nixon say they are not expecting to learn
2::th mishaps; WW”... him anything new. . . ‘ . . . ‘
:.;.’;‘,}‘;‘.,v,w.. ~ 332‘} “W" The limited time available for questioningathf nar::w::