xt7mgq6r2f7b https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7mgq6r2f7b/data/mets.xml University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate Kentucky University of Kentucky. University Senate University of Kentucky. Faculty Senate 1972-09-11  minutes 2004ua061 English   Property rights reside with the University of Kentucky. The University of Kentucky holds the copyright for materials created in the course of business by University of Kentucky employees. Copyright for all other materials has not been assigned to the University of Kentucky. For information about permission to reproduce or publish, please contact the Special Collections Research Center. University of Kentucky. University Senate (Faculty Senate) records Minutes (Records) Universities and colleges -- Faculty University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, September 11, 1972 text University of Kentucky University Senate (Faculty Senate) meeting minutes, September 11, 1972 1972 1972-09-11 2020 true xt7mgq6r2f7b section xt7mgq6r2f7b 5)

6)

MINUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE, SEPTEMBER 11, 1972 3416

The University Senate met in regular session at 3:00 p.m., Monday, September 11,
1972, in the Court Room of the Law Building. Chairman Flickinger presided. Members
absent: Staley F. Adams*, A. D. Albright, Lawrence A. Allen*, James R. Barclay*,
Charles E. Barnhart, Thomas G. Berry, Norman F. Billups*, Harold R. Binkley*,

Wesley J. Birge*, Harry M. Bohannan, Louis L. Boyarsky*, Garnett L. Bradford*,

Mary R. Brown*, Sally Brown, Lowell P. Bush*, S. K. Chan*, Jose M. Concon*,

Alfred L. Crabb, Larry Craft*, Glenwood L. Creech, Stephen Diachun*, George A.
Digenis*, R. Lewis Donohew*, Anthony Eardley, Jannette Fallen, Paul G. Forand,

Joseph R. Fordham*, Michael B. Freeman*, James E. Funk*, Eugene Gallagher*, Richard E.
Gift*, John V. Haley, Jack B. Hall, Joseph Hamburg, Charles F. Haywood*, Andrew J.
Hiatt*, Raymon D. Johnson, Robert F. Lawson, John L. Madden, William L. Matthews,
Thomas P. Mullaney*, Vernon A. Musselman*, J. W. Patterson*, Nicholas J. Pisacano,
Sheldon Rovin*, John S. Scarborough, Eugene J. Small, Dennis Stuckey, Shelby Thompson,
Nancy Totten*, S. Sidney Ulmer*, H. Mac Vandiviere, Jacinto J. Vazquez*, M. Stanley
Wall, Daniel L. Weiss, David R. Wékstein*, Harry E. Wheeler*, Raymond A. Wilkie*,

Paul A. Willis*, William W. Winternitz*, and Leon Zolondek*.

The minutes of May 8, 1972 were approved as circulated.

The Chairman asked the newly elected Senators to stand and they were welcomed
by the Senate.

The members of the Senate Council were introduced. They are Dr. Garrett
Flickinger, Chairman; Dr. Michael Adelstein, Chairman-elect, who will assume the
Chairmanship effective January 1, 1973; Dr. Staley F. Adams, Dr. Timothy H. Taylor,
Dr. Sheldon Rovin, Professor Paul Oberst, Dr. Constance P. Wilson, Dr. Jacqueline
Noonan, Dr. Stanford Smith, Mr. Howell Hopson, student member, Mr. Scott Wendelsdorf,
Student Government President; and a vacancy created by the resignation of Wendy
McCarty, student member, which is yet to be filled.

The Chairman also introduced the Secretary and Recording Secretary of the
University Senate, and the secretary in the office of the Sénate Council.

Dr. Flickinger presented Dr. Otis A. Singletary, President of the University
of Kentucky, who addressed the University Senate. The context of his address follows:

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Senate:

It is a pleasure to be here this afternoon for this first meeting
of the Senate in this school year, to have an occasion to welcome you
back, and to say something about what has been and is going on on this
campus in some areas that you may or may not be aware of. You may recall,
those of you who were members of the Senate last year, that at the opening
session I gave a somewhat formal talk that had to do with a ten-year look
at the institution and some projections for the future. About the best
thing that can be said about that is we only have to do it once a decade.
It does not have to be repeated now. However, in a less formal way, I
would like to pursue some of the topics that were broached a year ago.
I hope to do this in the future, as we look at this institution in the
context of what we have already enunciated as goals, or concerns, or
objectives. Certainly, I believe we are in general agreement on a number
of things that need to be done. I would like to make sure that there is
at least some awareness in the community of what is being done and what,
hopefully, might be done.

*Absence explained

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

%
1
:_
i

 

 

3417 Minutes of the University Senate, September 11, 1972 - cont

A year ago I talked about academic programs and their future
on this campus —— what was likely to happen. I am happy to say
that since that time there are some new programs around, and most of
you are aware of some of them, but I am not sure that you are aware ®
of all of them. 5

The Bachelor of General Studies degree which took up a good
bit of the time of this body last year is one clear example. Another
is the masters program in Computer Science. I hope you are aware
of the fact that the University moved last year in the UYA program,
an experiential learning program, the University Year in Action. You
should, I think, be aware of the development of a joint UK—U of L pro—
gram in Musicology at the graduate level. If you have not read it in
the newspaper, we are creating a Department of Family Practice to be
activated in July of this coming year. We have located the Chairman
and are now trying to ready facilities and recruit the staff. A
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine is also being created, in the
Medical Center but the Chairman has not yet been named.

In the area of undergraduate studies, a number of things have a
happened that I think are noteworthy. The Senate's Report on
Accelerated Programs was a very helpful step in giving some emphasis
to wider use of things like the CLEP program, Advanced Placement, and
special examinations of one kind or another. Advising, which plagues
all large institutions and, I suspect, a large number of small ones,
continues to be a problem here. The Advising Information Center was
created on this campus last year. We are hopeful that it will be of
some help, at least to a student who, having reached the point where
he or she wants to find out something, can go to that place and find
it out. The idea is to keep some up—to—date information in one specific
spot on this campus about the academic programs. We are hopeful
that there will be a University Advisor's Handbook published this year.
John Stephenson is working on that. We are looking forward to the pub—
lication of another issue of the Special Academic Opportunities at the
University, a supplement that was put out last year. I think we tend to
assume that students know about lots of programs on this campus that
actually they really do not know about. I think we are going to see
a Committee on the Freshman Year at work during this school year; and ‘
also, if we can put the resources together, the creation of an Instruc—
tional Resources Unit that we hope will be helpful to members of the
faculty and to teaching assistants.

There are a number of other things that probably bear mentioning
that are related to the academic area —— the newly—created Institute
for Mining and Minerals Research, state-funded, is in its first year
of operation. The Tobacco and Health Program, which also comes from
state funds, is under way. We are now looking at the possibilities
of some kind of new facility or structure in which these operations
can take place.

A number of other things —— a special education program which has
had considerable outside support and is engaged in a number of important
activities. Whether you know it or not, the University Press of Kentucky gai
has had its best year in history in terms of volume of sales and pub— ‘
lications, and the University's Research Foundation has had the highest
dollar volume of extramural support, in this past year in the University's
history —— the previous high being the year, 1969.

 Minutes of the University Senate, September 11, 1972 — cont 3418

All of these things, I think, bear some tidings for future
developments and, I hope, some brightness of outlook.

We also said a year ago something about graduate and pro—
fessional education at this University and the basic assumption
we made was that we were not turning our backs on this -— that it
was an appropriate role for the state University -- and I repeat
that as a statement now.

I will not bother to talk about the new degree programs in the
University and in the Allied Health areas, in particular. There are
a couple of international programs that you, perhaps, know about;
the one that has to with Thailand, which centers in the College of
Agriculture and the Venezuelan project that centers in the College of
Education. I think there are about four Ph.D. programs that are in
various stages of consideration within the University, and what we will
do with these is really not yet clear. I say this because the Council
on Public Higher Education has declared a moratorium on all new degree
programs, and I think we will have to have something other than our own
preferences and desires to get such programs through. We have managed
to get one M.A. program through since the moratorium was declared, and
we did that on the basis of demonstrated need for that program, here
and now. I would hope that in this year we are going to get under way
in the business of evaluating graduate programs——and undergraduate
programs, for that matter—~but I think we have got to give a fairly
hard look at the range of graduate offerings and answer those difficult
questions: Are we doing what we ought to be doing and, if we are, are
we doing them the way we ought to be doing them? Dean Royster has a
very clear commitment to move in the direction of evaluation of the
graduate offerings.

I might also say something about that perennial topic of interest
to all of us, the financial situation at the University. Clearly that
problem is not going to go away; it is going to come back to us annually
and, more pointedly, biennially, and I think we need to have some view
in front of us constantly about what the currents at play are. In terms
of state appropriation, you know that in the last legislature, while we
did not get what we wanted, and, in some cases, what we needed, we did
get a continuation budget with some fairly carefully—selected areas of
new program money. I suspect that kind of scrutiny is going to continue,
and perhaps tighten, in our state. We have also seen in this year an
increase in tuition, and another one has been established for next year.
Tuition for in—state students has gone up $75 a year this year and will
go up another $75 a year next year. This was action taken by the Council
on Public Higher Education during the past year, and I think it is going
to have some implication for this and the other campuses in the state.
There is a point where suddenly the question of being able to pay the
fees of the institution becomes a determining factor as to who goes and
who does not go. I think it is time we began to get more concerned
about this question because I fear that we are seeing this country of

ours in an escalation of costs -— not by any escalation of dollars for
student loans, grants or scholarships —— that is going to take a toll.
With reference to federal programs —— I am probably more informed than

you are about what actually happened. Higher education and legislation
in the past, as is usually the case, have been a lot longer on authori—
zation than they have on appropriation. It is also true that we got

a letter not long ago that verified what we all suspected, that it would

 

  

 

 

3419 Minutes of the University Senate, September 11, 1972 — cont

be too late for these programs to be affected favorably this year.

Therefore, it is going to be business as usual in the appropriation
of monies.

I would like to report to you something that I suspect is
not very widely known and that is the developments on the front of
attempting to secure private money for this University. You have
heard me say before that there has been no wide-scale tradition of
giving to the University of Kentucky. I make that statement as a
matter of fact, and not as a matter of condemnation. We have tried
in the last couple of years to create a University development group
and to get various programs under way. I think it should be of interest
to you that they are, in fact, under way. For example, there is the
University Fellows Program. The University Fellow is someone who has
given the University $10,000 or more. There are several ways they can
do this. But the point I would mention to you now is that we have
approximately 119 University Fellows at this time. We have developed
an Annual Giving Program, an organized systematic way to go at the
question of annual gifts to the University, and I am pleased to re—
port to you here that in this first year we already have over 232
people who belong to the so—called Hundred Club, who give $100 or
more to the annual giving program of the University. For comparative
data, in the last six months of last year we received something like
1800 gifts for a total of $72,000. This was the over-all picture of
gifts to the University. So far in the first eight months of this
calendar year we have over 3100 gifts and over $134,000 in annual
giving specifically; that does not include the general development.
When you take all the development gifts, grants, requests, combined we
have, so far, over 4200 gifts and slightly more than a half-million
dollars given to the University. The reason I take the trouble to
give you these facts is that I think it shows what we have suspected all
along, and that is that if we could make an effort to organize and develop
such a program, we could, in fact, expect some reasonable level of
support from our graduates, corporations, foundations, and other sources.
I find that very encouraging, and I hope that you will.

We talked a year ago about the hope that the physical facilities
of this University could be paid some attention, and I am pleased to
say to you that, to the degree this is possible, we are doing so.
There is something in the vicinity of twenty-five million dollars
worth of construction now under way of academic facilities in the System.
Such buildings as the Animal Sciences Building, which is nearing com—
pletion, the Health, Physical Education and Recreation Building, the
Library Addition which you see, a Community College at Madisonville
under construction, the whole utilities complex that you know about,
because I am sure that you stumble and fall at the open trenches, and
hide behind the earthworks, as everybody else does, going to and from
your duties, but that is likely to continue for a while or, hopefully,
it is going to continue for a while because these disaccommodations are
signs of some good things going on, and I hope that you can tolerate the
temporary disability. In addition to that 25 million dollars, there are
two other projects under construction here in Lexington that are primarily
and principally with funds from another source -— the often—discussed
stadium being one of those with the state's nine—million dollar bond
issue, and the new Veterans Administration Hospital which will be finished
in this year that we are entering. I am told that about the best

N: .

l

 'fh‘

Minutes of the University Senate, September ll, 1972 — cont 3420

estimate one can make is that that hospital, when it opens, will
represent about a seventeen—million dollar facility, and it is
going to have some real impact on our programs and services.

Looking to the future in terms of the physical facilities,
I would say that we could sit down and very easily tot up a score
of another thirty—million dollars worth of projects that we would like
to see constructed -— Biological Sciences, an addition to the hospital,
Family Practice space, nursing. Believe me, when I tell you there
are many, many, many needs and requests for space. Along with that
we are now spending, in this year, about a million dollars in re-
novation, and I hope that you have noticed. Those of you who are
back have seen some of the changes that have taken place. The renova-
tion dollars help make it possible for us to improve old and declining
facilities and make them somewhat more useful. If you have not seen
what has been done with the old Porter Memorial Church, you ought to
look at it. If you have not seen some of the labs in Funkhouser, and
classrooms for that matter, I hope you will look at them. And then
some of the older buildings here in the Quadrangle. We have to con-
tinue to put a certain number of our dollars into the renovation and
improvement of existing buildings. We simply cannot afford to tear
down or to let them remain fallow. I have a feeling that we are in
relatively good shape as far as our physical facilities are concerned.

The Medical Center? Everybody's goal, I think, can reasonably
be the making of a better and more serviceable Medical Center and I
think that some things have happened in this last year that indicate
our movement in that direction. I mentioned the two new programs.
The Student Health Service has had, I think, a right significant
milestone. I am not sure that this figure is precise and that I
will not be held accountable for it, but I think we have something
like 75 per cent voluntary cooperation in that part of the Student
Health Center Service that represents expanded service, where the
students, themselves, are coming in and paying a certain number of
dollars to provide a certain level of coverage. And that is all to
the good. The V.A. Hospital is going to do a great deal to increase
the range of services, programs, activities, in the medical field, and
one of the most striking figures, because this not happening all over
the country, is that we have seen an increase in the size of the in—
coming class in the Medical School. Everybody knows the crying need
for more doctors, and other needs, such as the distribution of doctors,
in this country, but it is at the medical school level where something
has to be done about training more doctors. In the last four years we
grew from an entering class of 75 up to an entering class of 103—105,
and in the next two years we will move that up probably in the range
of 115 or so. But at any rate, we do see that the opening of the V.A.
Hospital and the rest of it has given us the necessary resources to
train some additional medical students, and we are moving to d2_that.

I would go on beyond that somewhat to talk about the Community
College System. We have the Lexington Technical Institute as an in-
tegral part of this campus, right here. In Lexington, we tend not to
see or hear too much about the Community Colleges but we ought to be
aware of the fact that, as part of our University System, there is
this Community College System that is doing, I think, a very impressive
job. The things that have happened there in the last year help, I think,

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

3421 Minutes of the University Senate, September 11, 1972 — cont

to settle some of the dust around. We have issued a new Policy State—
ment which is the basic document approved by the Board of Trustees

for the Community Colleges. We have also gotten the question of
academic titles settled there. We have issued a document on appoint—
ment, promotion, termination, and tenure for Community College faculty
members and relied very heavily on the basic document used on the
Lexington campus. We have instituted the division structure, and in-
corporated Fort Knox. It was rated before sort of as a Community College,
and the plain fact is it is now offering work through the College of
Arts and Sciences on this campus and no longer is a part of the
Community College System. In turn, up at Southwest Jefferson, we have
created a new Community College campus as a satellite, you might say,

of Jefferson Community College, to deal with that population. I haven't
seen the enrollment figures for Southwest Jefferson, but I suspect

that we will have a hard time meeting the need. You might be interested
to know that we are now offering through the state some 36 associate
degree programs in the Community College structure and that about one—
fourth of the students in that System are in those associate degree
terminal programs. The remainder are in the college—parallel
curriculum. The Council on Higher Education has appointed a committee
of which Vice President Wall is chairman, to do something about this
problem, if there is one, of articulation between the Community Colleges
and all the four—year institutions, not just the University. That
committee is at work, and we are hoping that they will facilitate a much
smoother transition to the four year institutions. Certainly, we have
every reason, I think, to be proud of the Community College movement

in this state. When one realizes the limited resources that have been
available to it, I think the achievements, in terms of the programs,
personnel, recruiting and staffing of those facilities within such a
short time, are phenomenal. We are probably going to have something
like 11,000 students in the Community Colleges in the University's
System this year. I believe that the Community Colleges really do re—
present the best of two worlds. On the one hand they have the advan—
tages that come from University affiliation, and our contribution from
this campus to the Community College System has been significant. But
in addition to that, they also, through their local advisory boards,
have a measure of autonomy and local concern that gives them the ability
to respond to the felt needs in their community and I think that is a
system that is hard to beat.

We are now preparing for the next round in the annual evaluation
and methods of performance review. A committee is, in fact, already at
work. What we want is feedback from those of you who are interested,
and I gather almost everyone is interested in this business of faculty
evaluation and performance review. I am not sure there is any ultimate
solution to this but we are willing to keep finding out what it is that
is wrong with that system the last time around and trying to eliminate
it the next time around; and giving you the opportunity to find out what
new is wrong with it, so we can try and deal with that. The fact of the
matter is there is a very strong feeling in favor of performance review.
We simply are not sure that we have come up with any good way to do it.
The Committee will do the work, and any of you who have input to that
committee that you want to make, I hope you will do so. Certainly you
will be interested to know that we have recently appointed a committee
to draft and, hopefully, soon publish a faculty—staff retirement benefit
book. There just isn't any such thing around on this campus, and we are
hopeful that, in the course of this year, we will get both the content

a

r

 Minutes of the University Senate, September 11, 1972 — cont 3422

decided upon, and some kind of publication available to members of
the faculty and staff about retirement benefits.

We have continued the summer program and grants for the improve—
ment of teaching and we have just had the second of our graduate
teaching assistant orientation programs and from what I saw of the one
this year, I thought it was probably very helpful and certainly hope
that is the case.

In the case of students, I think you will be interested in an
overview of the enrollment situation. I begin this by saying that
we did not, and are not going to have, the kind of enrollment increase
that we anticipated as recently as 90 days ago. This is I suppose,
not so surprising since it is the national trend. Two years ago we
had a nine per cent increase, and last year, 10 per cent. I don't
know what it is going to be this year yet, but I don't think that it
is going to approximate those figures at all, and I think there are
a number of reasons. I mentioned tuition awhile ago. Tuition, by
itself, probably, is not what keeps youngsters out of school, but as
these costs go up, and it isn't just tuition —— everything —— the
whole inflation of this economy is affecting students as well as
everybody else. And the cost is a very serious factor. It is by no
means the only one. There are a lot of people who, for one or another
reason, have just opted out, some through disenchantment, who do not
happen to believe that what is going on here is relevant to their
purposes, and, that being the case, are opting for other things. Some
who are deciding on other kinds of educational opportunities, some
going into community college terminal and vocational programs. Many,
many things, I think, go into this, but the fact is that what is a
national phenomenon, is affecting HE as much as it is anybody else,
and I will await with interest to see what happens here and in the rest
of the state, in the enrollment area.

You will be interested in this. Figures indicate that we have a
significant drop in Education and Engineering in the number of students;
and a fairly stable enrollment in the Graduate School, Business and
Economics, in Architecture and in Arts and Sciences —— not too much
plus or minus. And a very high level of enrollment increase in Home
Economics, Allied Health, in the Social Professions, in Agriculture,
and in Nursing; in fact, the pressure on the Nursing school is just
fantastic, and I suspect is going to continue.

We also have undertaken some efforts to improve UK's performance
in the area of the minority student. Last year we created, as you will
recall, the Office of Minority Student Affairs. That office has had
a person added to its staff this year. In addition, the University is
participating in a federally financed talent search grant, which we
hope will bear some fruit. A new assignment has been made in the Registrar's
Office, where we can have some focal point where the problems of
registration, etc., can be handled. We are moving to do what we can and
I hope that these efforts will be productive. I would add one word
about another group of students here -- what, for lack of a better phrase,
I would call the academically—talented student. We don't do much at
this University in the way of providing encouragement for the really
superior student to come to this institution. We get a lot of them,

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

3423 Minutes of the University Senate, September 11, 1972 — cont

I am happy to say, and they come, I suspect, from certain natural
attractions this place has. Not all academic, I suspect, but in
any event, they are very real. The Honors Program does, however, g5;
get a relatively small grant out of whatever funds are available,
and I think last year we had about 10 small scholarships that we
were able to offer in competition. We not only got the 10 that
were chosen but I suspect a number of others who were competitors
in that program, and I received a report no later than this morning
about that with the request that those funds be made available. I
suspect Professor Evans knew that today would be a good day to make
that request. I will tell you that before you get an answer, in
writing, I will give it to you verbally, and the answer is "yes",

I think we should continue.

A number of things I would classify in the general area of
administrative developments, things that I am not at all sure that
you are aware of but things that I believe you should be aware of.
You, no doubt, are aware of the fact that we had a banner year in
deans last year. We had great turnover in the Deans' Corps: Dean
Royster beginning his first year as Graduate Dean; Art Gallaher has
taken over in Arts and Sciences; Dean Funk in Engineering, replacing
Bob Drake, who resigned his deanship; Dean Eardley in Architecture,
who is here on campus in his first year; Dean McKenna in Nursing;
we've had a rather significant turnover in Deans within the last year.
I would like to see that problem get somewhat more stabilized than this.
We are still in the process of looking for two. We are looking now,
and are fairly well down the road, I think, in the identification of
candidates for the Home Economics deanship, and the Search Committee
of the Law School is still at work in identifying candidates for that
position. I would hope that we can settle both before we get too far
into this academic year.

S.
1 i
/

Another thing happened just before school let out that probably
either went unnoticed by you or, if you noticed it at all, it was to
be outraged by bureaucratic heavy-handedness. That was the publica— 5%
tion of the Governing Regulations and Administrative Regulations. ‘”'
This has a story that is worth repeating. When I came here, in reading
literature, I was made aware of the fact that there were three sources
of all wisdom on this campus, the Governing Regulations, the Senate 3
Rules and Regulations, and the Administrative Regulations. I got the
Governing Regulations very fast since they were being re—written. Now
they were a matter of very real interest to everybody on this campus
at the time so I did get some familiarity with them. And then I did
locate the Senate Rules and was able to look at those and read them.
And then I began looking for the Administrative Regulations that were
the thirdcomponent, and after considerable fencing, it was finally made
abundantly clear to me that there weren't any and that there never
had been. There were some documents floating around that were Policy
Statements, but there was no compilation of any of these in any
systematic way. Well, we determined to do something about it, and
the result is the publication of a number of Administrative Regulations fl
that were issued and we waited till we got a rather substantial number,
to promulgate. As a matter of fact, if this does sound like just a
bunch of bureaucratic nonsense, let me tell you there are some very
important documents in there and it was high time that this was done.

 Minutes of the University Senate, September 11, 1972 — cont 3424

I will say further that it was largely through the efforts of

a member of this body, Professor Paul Sears, who is on part—

time assignment to my office. Paul Sears did yeoman's work in
getting these identified and getting them renwritten and cleared
through the various bodies that had input to them and I am hope—
ful that we now are beginning to have available, in print, the
things you can refer to when you have questions pertaining to,

I think, some very important matters. If I may take a minute, I
will bore you with this because I suspect that for some of you it
may turn out to be important. First of all, we have about 10 ab—
solutely new regulations, or interpretations, in there. There is
one in there that you won't believe, but you can go ahead and look
at it. It describes the responsibilities of the officers of
Central Administration. When you have nothing else to do, you can
read that for kicks. The policy for faculty performance review

is in there; you had better read it fast because it will come out
and another one will go in very shortly; budget policies and pro-
cedures; consulting and overload employment; enrollment of post-
doctoral scholars, interns, residents, and clinical fellows; copy—
rights and property rights; educational opportunities for University
employees; the Community College faculty document I mentioned a
moment ago; management and allocation of space for the renovation
of existing structures; policies for receiving gifts, etc. We also
revised a number that were already around, and some of these, I
suspect, are very important: A part of the so—called Garrigus
Committee report which has been looked over very carefully and is
there for you. There have been questions about what the policies
were or ought to be. Now, at least, there is something specific
for you to look at: a Policy Statement on the Community College
System, etc. We still have a number of others—~ones that had already
existed that were included in there: the off-campus speaker policy
that you recall from an earlier time; a policy about appearing
before the Board of Trustees, etc. We are working on a number of
others that I suspect will be considered in the course of this year
and, as adopted, will, in fact, be issued; for example, the use of
Memorial Coliseum, Memorial Hall, time, place, and manner, which
has been kicking around for over a year, policies and procedures for
the review of educat