xt7mkk94bg75 https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7mkk94bg75/data/mets.xml The Kentucky Kernel Kentucky -- Lexington The Kentucky Kernel 1975-11-10 Earlier Titles: Idea of University of Kentucky, The State College Cadet newspapers  English   Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. The Kentucky Kernel  The Kentucky Kernel, November 10, 1975 text The Kentucky Kernel, November 10, 1975 1975 1975-11-10 2020 true xt7mkk94bg75 section xt7mkk94bg75   

Vol. LXVII No. 70
Monday, November 10 1975

Ker

EN TUCKY

an independent student newspaper ——1

     

e] University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky

Council approves $23 million biennial increase...

By GINNY EDWARDS
Managing Editor

‘RANKFORT ——The Council on Public
Higher Education recommended Friday
an approximate $23 million increase in
state support for UK for the 1976-78
biennium. UK had requested about a $31
million increase.

During its two day meeting. the Council
also voted to recommend an approximate
$16 million increase in state support for the
University of Louisville for the biennium
beginning July 1. 1976.

A philosophical argument erupted
Thursday between the presidents of U of L
and UK over the council's recommenda-
tions for state support for the two schools.

UK President ()tis A. Singletary cal-
culated that U of L would receive more
state support per student than UK if the
council approved the recommendation. He
also expressed fears that the council‘s
recommendations were aimed at making
U of L another UK.

Higher education status differentiating
between the two institutions state:

(KRS 1641815) “The University of Louis-
ville shall continue to be a principal
university for the conduct of research and
service programs without geographical
limitations, but subject to the implied
limitation of KRS 164:125.”

(KRS 164:125) “The University of Ken—
tucky shall continue to be the principal
state institution for the conduct of state-
wide research and service programs."

The Thursday night meeting, which
lasted nearly six hours, was held betWeen
Singletary, U of L President James Miller

and the council staff. Singletary requested
the meeting “to understand the basis of the
council’s calculations as they relate to UK
and U of L."

David Carter. council associate director
for fiscal affairs, made a report to the
council Friday concerning the meeting.
“The basis that the figures were arrived at
for U of L and the basis that the figures
were arrived at for UK are now more
understandable.“ he said.

After reviewing council and UK figures
the council determined U of L would
receive $175 more per student than UK by
the end of the biennium.

The council suggested. however. that U
of L‘s recommended budget be approved
for four reasons:

—U of L's increase is not comparable to
any other university. Carter said. They
needed a special allocation which sprang
from serious financial conditions:

—the respective missions of UK and U of
L were not considered by the council staff
in deriving the recommendation —nor
should it be implied that they were.

—Carter continued by saying, the pro-
posed increase in U of L funding is
designed to get them through 1977 —fur-
ther allocations will be determined later;

——the recommended increase in U of L's
budget does not mean UK is still not
considered as the primary state institu-
tion, Carter concluded.

In response to Carter’s remarks. Single~
tary said he did not object to the
recommended increase for U of L, but was
concerned about the effects it would have
on UK.

He also reiterated his concern over the
inclusion of U of L and Northern Kentucky

State College (NKSC) into the state’s
higher education system. Singletary said
he is concerned about the effects state
funding for U of L and NKSC will have on
UK funding.

Looking good

Miller said, “I am distressed that this
has gotten to the point that everything is
not being looked at as a whole system.”

Continued on page 5

 

——8rian Tlrpdt

UK defenders sack Vanderbilt Quarterback
Fred Fisher on this play but he came back to

thread the Wildcat defense with sharp

for now

passing

in the Commodores 13-3 upset

As UK budget process moves a step further

By GINNY EDWARDS
Managing Editor

After nearly eight months of examining.
questioning and amending. the University
Biennial Budget Request was submitted to
the(‘ oum ii on Public Higher Education for
consideration.

The council recommended approxima-
tely $23 million in increased state support
for the [976-78 biennium about an $8
million cut from the University request.

 

Analysis

The biennial request. which outlines the

 

University's expected monetary needs
from July 1. 1976. to June 30, 1978. was
approved by the University Board of

Trustees at its October meeting.

State appropriations comprise just less
than half of the total $402.5 million
University budget request.

The other half of the money is received
from student fees. gifts to the University
—grants and endowments. interest on
University investments and federal ap—
propriations.

Now that the council has evaluated and
made its recommendations concerning
llK‘s budget request. the recommenda-
tions and the original ['K request will be
sent M the Kentucky Executive Depart-
ment of Finanie and Administration.

 

according to Ed ‘ter. University budget

director.

“But the whole 1, uget process starts
long before the request is submitted to the
Board of Trustees." Carter said.

“Last March President ()tis A. Single-
tary put out a budget call through all the
vice presidents." he said. Singletary
stipulated that all budget-request infor-
mation be presented in a specific format
established by the council.

In the actual budget request document. a
letter of transmittal by Singletary explains
that the council wanted the request to be
displayed in a functional rather than
organizational format.

Keeping this in mind. the seven UK vice
presidents contacted each division within
their responsibility and requested an

 

estimation of monies needed to operate
during the 1976-78 biennium.

In some cases. division heads contacted
sub-divisions within their authority to
obtain budget estimations.

Each unit. division and office evaluated
its specific situation and made recom-
mendations to respective vice presidents.
Carter said. The seven University vice
presidents then decided what items to
support and those to cut from the
individual recommendations.

”The president in conjunction with the
vice presidents. looked at the institution‘s
needs as a whole. After viewing all
recommendations. a system of prioritizing
the requests began." Carter explained.

The actual budget document was pre-
pared in September for presentation to the
University Board of Trustees at its Oct. 7
meeting.

Along with the approved University
budget request. council recommendations

have now been forwarded to the state
Department of Finance. which includes
the governor‘s budget staff.

Gov. Julian Carroll, working with the
Finance Department, will draft the Ken-
tucky Executive Budget which will include
his budget request for UK.

The Kentucky General Assembly. which
convenes in January for 90 days, will act
on the governor's budget.

“()nce action is taken. the institutions
then know the amount of state appropri—
ations on which to build an operating
budget.“ (‘arter said.

Since the final state appropriation is
usually less than the original request.
Singletary and his cabinet will be required
to make further priority decisions. “The
president says. ‘Here’s what I can give
you.‘ He (Singletary) then delegates the
budgetary management function to the
various vice presidents,“ Carter said.

Working much the same way as they did
originally, the vice presidents will allocate
“X amount of dollars“ to each division
within their responsibility.

Singletary must give final approval to
all proposals for each unit, division and
office. Once these proposals are approved.
a final operating budget is drawn up for
each year of the biennium.

Carter said he hopes that the final
operating budget will be ready to present
to the Board of Trustees at its April
meeting.

  

Editorials do not represent the opinions of the University.

editorials

Susan Jones
Editorial Page Editor

Bruce Winges
Editor-in-Chief
Letta'sandSpectruma’ticlesstnitdbeadd’essed tothe Editwiat Page Editu',

Room "4 Joix'nalism Building. They stmld be typed. Mean! an sigma.
Lettasshould not exceedmwurdsand Spectrumarticlesmm

Jack Koeneman
Associate Editor

Ginny Edwards
Managing Editor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scholar

needs
correcting

 

By Shelley Pulliom

 

I have recently been sending a friend
of mine who lives in Atlanta, 6a., the
latest happenings on campus concern.
ing the issue of homosexuality and have
included the various comments which
appeared in the Kernel. She presented.
in a letter, her views as a Christian. Her
letter read as follows:

Some true believer needs to correct
that "Bible Scholar“ Ted Chudnick
(Kernel, Oct. 21, ”Jesus loves us, yes
we know”) in the bright and broad
column of Spectrum (if it’s the Lord’s
will). Someone needs to tell him that
the Old Testament is law, the New
Testament is by grace; that the Bible
does not contradict itself but the Old
Testament was written for propheSy to
the Messiah promised, and the New
Testamentatter He has come; that the
Christian message is not what you
should do in this life, but the fact that
God loves you so much that He gave His
only begotten Son to die for us that
whoever believes in Him should not
perish but have everlasting life; that
men’s own fight against change is not
what God is pleased with, but men’s
surrender to God’s way of change — the
only way through prayer to God the
Father through Jesus Christ the Son, in
the power of God the Holy Spirit; that
homosexuality’s coming recognition is
not an issue in itself to be fought by us
(in our own power) but is iust another
fulfillment of the prophesy of God in the
second and soon coming of Jesus
Christ.

Y0u know what I mean? I cannot in
my own self as a woman and fellow
person deny the right of any other
person to a chance of expressing
themself, but I can as a true believer
band together in fellowship with other
true believers to pray that God would
save the president of the Gay Students’
Coalition in a mighty way, as He truly
wants to.

We cannot iudge. Homosexuality is
not the issue we as Christians need to be
concerned with. It is the fact that God
does not wish that any should perish,
but that all should come to repentence.

When we as Christians fight the act of
homosexuality, we come up against
accusations that we are unfair. But
when we as Christians let God fight sin
(the God who says: “Come let us
reason together. . . . ”l and we as
Christians be ambassadors, witnesses
of the true Saviour in love, then the
Holy Spirit convicts of sin, of need in
our lives, of lack of purpose, and peace
in our lives, until we know Him.

In your prayer and Bible study group,
see ”their” need. When you see ”their"
rebellion, know "their" need. When you
pray for ”their” salvation, trust in God.
Fight the real issue: the need of all
mankind to come to God in repentence
and to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.

4A

Shelley Pulliam is a social work iunior.

 

 

 

1“,. ___.-._J'

a rig/fl
I , .,
/

 

 

 

OF EUROPE!’

 

-- Letters

(Editor’s note: Because of the number of letters and commentaries received by
the Kernel, there is no editorial today. In cases where a number of letters and
commentaries are received about one or several subjects, more space is
devoted to readers' views. All letters and Spectrum articles should be typed,
double-spaced and signed. Letters should not exceed 250 words and Spectrum

articles 750 words.)

 

 

i.

Free U

Editor:
I am sorry to read about the dif-

ficulties of Free University. Once again
Free U offers discussion groups on a
wide variety of interesting topics and
how-to courses in subiects ranging
from the practical to the esoteric. The
program isa definiteasset to the people
of the community; those who originated
it and those who have kept it alive
deserve our gratitude.

I am sympathetic to the reasons
given by Student Government (86)
President Jim Harralson for vetoing
funding of Free U. 56 helps worthy
student organizations get started, but
cannot be expected to fund them all
year after year. However, Free U is
unique among studentorganizations. It
is not a special interest group, but
rather is a general public service to any
group of students interested in any
subject they wish to pursue. Support
such a program seems just the sort of
thing SG is for. I hope SG will help keep
Free U alive.

Wayne H. Davis

continues its present war on all big
business athletics. Suppose that be-
cause the campus voice opposes foot.
ball and homecoming queens we cannot
recruit decent football players as we
have in the past. Then what happens? i.
The Kernel wins. 2. Big time athletics
falls apart at UK. 3. Attendance drops
at the games. So what?...you say.

At $8 a head, that’s money. At $5 a
meal from obtoftowners, that’s mon—
ey. At $25 a night for lodging, that's
money. Clothes? Entertainment? That
is money. Millions. It’s also publicity
wnationwide —and that can mean
grants, scholarships, a lot of donations,
and decisions to put that next office in
Lexington instead of Knoxville.

What this all means is iobs. It could
very well be yours or mine. I'm not
talking ab0ut sports jobs alone. Every
merchant, service, communications
medium, factory and bank is affected.
I’m here to prepare myself for a job. I
don’t want a dumb-ass campus news-
paper phasing 0ut empIOyment in the
area.

Jim Stone
Engineering senior

Biology Professor Memory

'Trash'

Editor:

The currently published piece of
trash called the Kernel does not repre-
sent the attitude of the majority of
students with which I am acquainted.
The slanted reporting and poor journal-
istic content of your newspaper is
embarassing to me. I can imagine the
outrage it should cause the alumni and
the community as a whole.

Consider only the financial impact on
the local economy if the Kernel

Editor:

With the memory of our tragic
Vietnam involvement still lingering in
our public conscience, it is important
that we heed the lessons of this
experience and avoid similar future
confrontations. But we as Americans
must also be wary of opponents who use
Vietnam to divert constructive foreign
policy to their own ends. I speak of the
Palestine Liberation Organization
(PLO) its proponents (Mason Taylor,
Kernel, Oct. 8) who oppose a peaceful
settlement between Egypt and Israel,
and then try to convince the American

people that another Vietnam is start
ing. ,

The differences are obvious. In
Vietnam we involved ourselves with
one side in a military situation. In the
Middle East we are working with both
sides to create a peaceful settlement.
The technicians (not advisors) will be
trying to maintain a peace, and not to
teach the two sides about war.

Unlike Vietnam, neither lsrael nor
Egypt has asked for American troops.
All major public Israeli officials have
clearly stated that they don’t want
Americans to fight their war. All they
ask for is the ability to obtain weapons
capable of defending themselves a-
gainst their opponents’ Russian-sup-
plied equipment.

There has been no new sudden UK
support of Israel since 1973 as Taylor
asserts. All Presidents since Truman
have affirmed their support for Israel.
She has bought arms from the US
steadily since 1967 (prior to that lsrael
bought most of her military supplies
from France.) The $26 million to which
Taylor refers, is US foreign aid to Israel
from 1948-1972, (a figure far less than
what was given to the Arab govern-
ments) and not in arm sales. Most of
the 2.5 billion made available in 1973, as
well as the $2 billion in the recent
agreement is in the form of a loan, and
Israel is one of the few countries who
does pay back US loans. Taylor also
fails to realize that lsrael had to fight
sophisticated Russian weapons sup-
plied to the Arabs during the 1973 War.
ln order for Israel to survive she had to
obtain sophisticated American wea-
pons as well as replacements for
damaged weapons. The bill for these
weapons was, and is, very high.

In supporting lsrael, we are support-
ing a democratic nation (not a corrupt
dictatorship as in Vietnam), in her
struggle to live peacefully with her
neighbors. Both we and Israel have the
common interest in developing peace in
the Middle East. Let us not be swayed
by people whose idea of peace in this
troubled area is the destruction of the
Jewish State.

Howard Kat:
Plant Physiology graduate student

 

«A a. M-w~'- ‘

-mtw

”MW-I ~J .i

"V‘M'"

«(a

kmmn—AAA

l

QammS‘D-r-Om

TlQ'OfiQJ‘OiDd

 \fiz an

an);

 

.. ~ ._‘,..,.. -

w

 

,I‘
7

an.‘ “,4 M-~.'“ -,

may

‘,-JWV M .. .-

' V‘M‘"

~ a..- \-

 

 

 

spectrum

 

 

 

By C. Joseph Greene

Occasionally one hears the expression of
views so repugnant to one’s personal
sensitivities that he feels obligated to
speak out in oppostion. Mr. W. J. Kearney
lll’s recent letter in the Kernel (”Blind
Justice,” Oct. 29) was such an assault not
only upon my own convictions, but upon
any belief in the personal freedom of the
individual.

In his letter Kearney voiced the proposi»
tion that he has the ”Right” to recognize
homosexuals in any crowd. Therefore he
suggested that members of the gay
coalition wear armbands identifying them-
selves according to their sexual prefer-
ence. Kearney went on to state that:
”Christians also have the right not to lunch
with homosexuals.” Therefore he said that
the cafeteria should have a partition to
segregate any gay diners from these
Christians. In addition, since ”we also
have the right to avoid close physical
proximity with homosexuals on crowded
buses and other means of transport,”
Kearney argued that the University should
provide “equal but separate means of
transportation.”

Kearney w0uld not have had to go very
far back in history to come up with these or
similar suggestions. They are almost
identical to measures which the German
National Socialists took against another
minority group—the Jews this time—in the
early stages of the Nazi christian crusade
against Judaism. You see, the Jews were
different, too, and were the target of the
dominant culture’s fear and hatred be-

 

'Repugnant' e}
letter insults‘:3 t???
convictions ’ '*

cause of this difference.

i am not gay, for the very same reason
thatour'militantchristian, Kearney, is not
gay—l was lucky in the accidental
circumstances of my early environment.
The sexual orientation of gay people is the
result of their early conditioning, just as
our sexual orientation is. To make pariahs
of gays because of their sexual orienta-
tion——a condition for which they are not
responsible and could not change if they
wished—makes as much sense and is as
moral, as persecuting blacks on account of
their color, or paraplegics on account of
their particular deviation from the norm.
Of c0urse, Kearney’s ”right“ to recognize
deviants isn’t denied by these minorities:
the black’s skin color and the paraplegic’s
wheel chair make them easy to spot and
avoid in any crowd.

If one takes the christian symbol of the
cross and bends the ends of all four
projections in the same direction, a
swastika results. Let us hope that
Kearney’s concept of Christianity is equal.
ly twisted. I am not gay, but I would far
rather be homosexual (a condition for
which I could not be held ethically culpable

 
    

 

by any rational human or God) than an
adherent of such a twisted creed. Any God
who would make someone a homosexual
and thereby subject to all the perseCUtions
that gays in our society are subject to —
and further condemn them for what they
can not help—would be a particularly
fiendish character for even sick, irrational
human beings to dream up. If God were
really such a fiend, and condemned
homosexuals to a hell for being what they
are, I would unhesitatingly opt to live in
that hell with my gay brothers and sisters
rather than enter into this twisted God’s
twisted heaven.

Furthermore, if the day should ever
come when gays would be compelled by
the ”Christian” majority to wear arm-
bands declaring their sexual preference, I
will have no choice but to wear such an
armband also. When Henry David
Thoreau went to prison rather than pay
taxes to support what he considered an
immoral war with Mexico, Ralph Waldo
Emerson visited him in the Concord jail
and asked his friend why he was in prison.
Thoreau reportedly responded: "My dear
Emerson, why are y0u not here?” Prison,

   

it appears, is sometimes the only proper
place for men of conscience, just as the
day may come when anyone on the side of
dignity for all human beings must wear
one of Kearney’s armbands.

Kearney hasn’t yet succeeded in intro-
ducing his christian reform program into
practice, but can we afford to wait for that
day? Such repugnant ideas must be
identified as the assault on civilization
that they are. ”Christians“ sat by smugly
as the Nazis began carrying their reforms
through, and such apathy eventually
resulted in the extermination of six million
Jews. Silence is too often implied consent.
l am sincerely disappointed in all the
members of our University community
who have not responded in any way to
either Kearney’s letter or the numerous
letters of those with similar anti-gay
prejudices. Yes, every one of y0u—from
the Ioftiest full professors to the humblest
part time freshperson—has a responsi-
bility here. Can you really believe that the
process in which we are all supposedly
engaged—the education of ourselves and
each other—~is so unimportant as to be
properly restricted to the classroom
syllabus, or that ignorance and intolerance
of this kind we are seeing are such minor
vices as to not be any danger to us all?

As for myself, I confess that my motive
here is a selfish one. I now h0pe I may be
able both to get some decent sleep tonight
and to get back to my studies tomorrow
refreshed, after having done my best
effort to put Kearney behind me.

 

C. Joseph Greene is an English graduate
student.

 

Busing involves democratic rights

 

(Editor’s note: The following statement
concerning busing to achieve school
desegregation was adopted by the second
National Student Conference Against Ra-
cism in Boston Oct. 10, ii and 12. The
statement was submitted to the Kernel by
Russell Pelle, UK Student Coalition
Against Racism spokesperson.)

 

A national campaign is underway, led by
President Gerald Ford and the leaders of
the United States Congress, against busing
to achieve school desegregation. The
purpose of this racist campaign is to
weaken and divide the Black community
and to help push back many of the social
and economic gains that Blacks and other
minorities have won over the past two
decades.

At our founding conference in February,
1975, the National Student Coalition A-
gainst Racism (NSCAR) took a strong
position in support of busing as a means of
achieving school desegregation. At this
conference, we sh0uld reaffirm that
position and launch a national campaign to
defend school desegregation and fight
Racism.

The issue involved is not busing, but
rather the democratic rightof Blacks to go
to any school of their choice and their right
to go to the best schools that the city, state
and federal governments can provide.

Today, the fight for this right is still
squarely on the agenda. Forces opposed to
busing have continued to mobilize and
have gained new allies in Congress and the
White HOuse.

Boston still remains at the center of the
fight for school desegregation as a national
test for both the racist antibusing forces

and for the supporters of desegregation.

The racists in Boston have not given up.
They are still mobilizing to crush the
c0urt-ordered desegregation plan, and
they have joined ranks with racists in
Louisville and other cities to mobilize
against busing, school desegregation and
the rights of Black peOple in general.

Whatever tense “calm” that prevails in
Boston thus far this fall is due to the strong
show of force by city and state cops. But
the racists have continued their mobiliza-
tions and their violent attacks against
Black pe0ple.

It is well known by the President,
Congress and the leaders of the antibusing
forces that only three per cent of all
students bused in this c0untry are bused
for the purposes of desegregation.

Blacks are seeking busing to leave
segregated areas of cities and towns where
they are stuck with the worst school
facilities. They are demanding to go to
where better schools existwhich happen to
be predominantly white. Busing is a
means to get better education not availa-
ble in the all-Black schools. Because of the
racism of local school authorities, it should
be up to Black peOple themselves to decide
which schools are the better schools and it
is up to the 90vernment to provide them
the means to get them there. For Blacks to
get an equal education, we must support
their right to go to any school they want.

The reason why Black people support
busing of whites to formerly white schools
is not to force whites to attend inferior
schools. it is to pressure the local school
committees to improve these schools so
that Blacks and whites can get the best
education possible.

Support to busing for desegregation,

... -. M . . ,. r .h. 4.1.. s .
v a. g . )j ‘ wen—saw up

however, is not at all counterposed to the
rights of other oppressed minorities ~for
example, Chinese, Puerto Ricans and
Chicanos —especially in regard to their
rights to maintain bi—lingual, bi-cultural
education programs and to take steps to
win equal education. NSCAR activists
sh0uld be crystal clear that any busing
plan which cuts across the rights of other
minorities must be amplified to uphold the
rights of all Oppressed minorities.

The fight for equal education takes
many forms. NSCAR supports the right
and the struggles of Blacks, Puerto
Ricans, Chicanos, native Americans and
Asian Americans to control their own
schools. Struggles to implement this right
are directed against racist, segregated
educational systems. The fight for the
rightof students of oppressed nationalities
to attend any school they want via busing
is bound up with the fight of the same
students to attend schools controlled by
their Own communities. Racist forces
Oppose both. To be fully effective in
Opposing the bigots, we must take them on
at each front, championing both busing
and community control.

Many if not most peOple are confused
ab0ut busing. Recent polls indicate that 74
per centot the people say they are opposed
to busing. Our job must be to go on a
national education and action campaign to
win mass support to school desegregation.
We mustwin the majority of the American
people to an understanding that busing is
necessary to implement school desegre-
gation.

The way to do that is for the supporters
of desegregation and busing to outmobilize
the racists in street actions and meetings
and to win over the majority of peeple of

all nationalities to the antiracist struggle.

We have to launch a massive public
campaign for Black rights and school
desegregation that can force the govern.
ment hfederal, state and city —to enforce
its own laws that protect the democratic
rights of Black people. This includes
demanding that the government use all
necessary force to enforce its laws,
including city police, state troopers, the
national guard, and federal troops.

The 74 per cent opposed to busing can be
turned around and won to our cause. The
Dec. 14 Freedom March and the May 17
march for school desegregation initiated
by the NCAAP, which together mobilized
over 30,000 people in Boston, show the way
to crush the racist antibusing movement:
a campaign of mass education, mass
mobilization and struggle.

The focal point of our fall activities
should be nationally coordinated activities
to defend school desegregation and fight
racism on Nov. 22. This date can be
preceded by an educational campaign in
the high schools and universities and
throughout the population in support of
school desegregation and to answer racist
attacks against busing.

On Nov. 22, IOrAI areas can organize
forums, teach-ins, picket lines, demon,
strations, rallies and other activities
involving Black, Puerto Rican, Chicane
and Asian American student organiza-
tions, community, civil rights and individ-
uals willing to support the rights of
oppressed peoples.

The theme of these activities 5:" mild be:
Keep the buses rolling! stop n...- rs .31
attacks on Black students! Dwseqr
the schools now!

For more info call 266 05.40 L

L

.5

 4—THE KENTUCKY KERNEL. Monday. November 10. 1975

What a week we’ve

got for you!

Tuesday - Phil Copeland and Foxfire

Wednesday & Thursday - Apocrypha

Saturday — Locomotive

Come on down to Chevy Chase
and enjoy the fun

Chevy Chase 21 and over

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raymond appeal denied

The final appeal for release of a former UK student jailed for
refusing to testify before a Fayette County grand jury was denied
Friday.

In denying the motion for the release of Jill Raymond, US.
District Judge Bernard T. Moynahan stated it was “frivilous.
without merit and a blatant attempt to trifle with the court."

Raymond and five other present or former UK students were
jailed March 8 for refusing to testify before the Grand Jury
investigating two fugitives who allegedly lived in Lexington.

The other five were released after testifying about their
knowledge of Susan Saxe and Katherine Power, who were sought
by the FBI in connection with a 1970 Boston bank robbery.

Raymond, denied release by the US. Sixth Circuit Court of
Appeals and denied appeal by the US. Supreme Court, has now
apparently exhausted all legal recourse for release. '

‘Greek Sing’ upcoming

Preliminary judging to select the four fraternities and five
sororities that will participate in the second annual Chi Omega
“Greek Sing" will be held tonight and tomorrow night.

Six fraternities will be judged tonight to select the final four. The
sorority prelimary competition will be held tomorrow night.

The charity contest will be held Nov. 12 at 8 .m. in the Student
Center Ballroom. according to Charlene Elam. Greek Sing chair-
person.

Elam said the 14 Greek organizations that originally entered the
competition were required to pay a $10 entrance fee. Proceeds from
the sing Wafter the cost of the trophies and a fee for use of the
ballroom is extracted vwill be given to United Way of the
Bluegrass.

Elam said the group anticipates exceeding last year's donation of
$150 to the United Way. Admission to the show is free. though
donations will be taken at the door.

A panel of four judges will select the winning group. judging
originality, Showmanship. musical quality and costumes. Content
of the acts is decided by the individual groups and the only limits
are that the performance last at least 10 minutes. involve a
minimum of 15 participants and that the act include song and dance
sequence.

Sigma Nu won the fraternity division last year and Alpha Zeta
Delta was the sorority champion. The sweepstakes winner. the

overall best performance. was awarded to Gamma Phi Beta
sorority.

Poll shows Humphrey in '76

WASHINGTON (AP) —Next Antitrust action against the

news briefsl

 

 

“will/E & m“ CoNCE
. hum b

 

   

  
  
  

ul
er one contemporary so

 

e t . ‘
Danniebelle Hall \79‘“

   

Bill Maw,”

 

   

 

 

Nov. 13

a P.M. THURSDAY HENRY CLAY HIGH SCHOOL

Tickets Lexington
$3.50 in advance Available At 54.00 at the door

MOfiRN SOUND CO. 235 Bolivar St.-MRNEY MLLER‘S 232 E Nbit't
BEREAN m STORE 2179 Versailta Rd.—VAR|ETY REmRDS Turflatd Mall
STIFFLER’S PIANO (I). Eastlam 9min Garter
DAWAHARE’S Fayette Nb", Ginsu WM enter LLexington Mal
WALLACE’S m STOREJSS S. LINN-PAM LY ”OK STORE Fayette Nb"

torintormatim: KenMnity, me'tcoordimtorZSSfisoorvS-m
resented by
CAMPUS ACTION 5. WJIVM

 

 

year's Democratic ticket will be
Sen. Hubert Humphrey and Jim-
my Carter. 3 poll of 162 members
of the Democratic National Com-
mittee indicates.

Humphrey polled a resounding
49 per cent in response to the
question of who committee mem-
bers thought would win their
party's presidential nomination.

Humphrey‘s closest competitor
in the US. News and World
Report poll was Sen. Henry M.
Jackson of Washington with 14
per cent. followed by Sen. Ed—
ward Kennedy of Massachusetts.
8 per cent; Sen. Birch Bayh of
Indiana, 6 per cent and Rep.
Morris Udall of Arizona. 5 per
cent.

Mao impaired

NEW YORK (AP) —Newsweek
magazine reported Sunday that
Communist Chinese party Chair-
man Mao Tse-tung‘s speech is
impaired to the extent that he