xt7mpg1hj76f https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7mpg1hj76f/data/mets.xml Lexington, Kentucky University of Kentucky 19371114 minutes English University of Kentucky Contact the Special Collections Research Center for information regarding rights and use of this collection. Minutes of the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees Minutes of the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees, 1937-11-dec14-ec. text Minutes of the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees, 1937-11-dec14-ec. 1937 2011 true xt7mpg1hj76f section xt7mpg1hj76f Minutes of the Meeting of the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees of the University of Kentucky, Tuesday, Decem- ber 14, 1937, called on that date by the Chairman of the Commit- tee, Richard C. Stoll, for the purpose of acting on any and all business of the University of Kentucky ready for consideration of the Board of Trustees or Executive Committee. The Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Uni- versity of Kentucky, a quorum being present, met in President hic- Vey's office at the University, Tuesday, December 14, 1937, at 10:30 a.m. The members of the Committee present were Chairman Ri6hard C. Stoll, James Park, and R. Miller Holland. Louis Hil- lenmeyer, Commissioner of Agriculture Garth Ferguson and Dr. George Wilson, members of the Board of Trustees, were present. President Frank L. McVey, D. H. Peak, Secretary of the Board, and Dean James H. Graham were present. The Secretary stated that he had received a telephone message from the secretary of Mr. J. B. Andrews, in which she regretted that Mr. Andrews could not attend the meeting on account of illness. During the meeting a tele- phone message was received from Judge John Cooper, in which he said that he had hoped to attend the meeting but found he was not well enough to do so. Judge Cooper is slowly recovering from an illness of several months. The members present regretted the absence of Mr. Andrews and Judge Cooper caused by illness and expressed hope of speedy recovery. 1. Approval of Minutes. The minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee of November 24, 1937, were approved as published. 2. President's Report. The President's quarterly report to the Board of Trustees was ordered recorded in the Minutes. The report is in words and figures as follows: QUARTERLY REPORT PF THE PRESIDENT to The Board of Trustees December 14, 1937 The University in the past week has lost two men long asso- ciated with it. One was Professor Enoch Grehan and the other J. S. Barnes, farm foreman at the Robinson Sub-Station at 4uick- sand. Professor Grehan was an effective man for the University. He built up a large department and managed the business of it with ability. He had the missionary spirit and a gentle, genial at- titude that endeared him to students. For many years Mr. Barnes lived at the Robinson Sub-Station. He understood the people of the area and he rendered an invaluable service. He will be greatly missed. The University grieves 2. over the death of these men. Problems It has been the custom in presenting the Presidentis quarter- ly statement to review the condition of the University, This time I wish to call the attention of the Board to a series of problems that are pressing for consideration. First among these is the increasing demands that are being made upon the Universi- ty. Hardly a week passes that the University is not only asked but urged to make some additional commitment. Many of these things are most worth-while, and some of them are important. They range from the use of buildings and office space to research pro- posals and the creation of new schools. All of them require money and no difference how worth-while the proposal may be, the answer is readily at hand. Such restrictions however, cannot go on indefinitely without leaving the University behind in activi- ties it should carry on, Salaries The increasing student body and the growth in numbers of graduate students bring at once many questions, such as adequate teaching staff, more laboratory facilities and supplies, better library provisions and housing facilities. In the long run the reputation and standing of the University rest four-souare upon its faculty. This means good Judgment in selecting men and money with which to pay them. The Board is familiar with the salary situation end it may be noted in passing that the University has been criticized in paying too low salaries when a recent inspec- tion was made of one of the colleges. There are directly before us the alternatives of reducing the size of the staff, or of get- ting more money to pay salaries. The sources from hich income might be obtained are additional student fees or larger appropria- tions for general operation. Unfortunately, student fees are as high as it appears wise to make them at this time, and as to ad- ditional appropriations, the needs of he University have been pressed upon the administration. The University may seek young men who promise well for places on the staff, and then lose them to institutions that can offer them more. In the long run such a procedure must leave a possibly devoted, but only an average group. The standard of salaries prevailing in 1931 at the Uni- versity of Kentucky was reduced ten per cent in the following year, Since then costs of living have gone up, leaving the scale less than it was in 1932. Pressure of Student Population In the requests presented to the State Finance Board a con- siderable sum was asked for capital expenditures to provide apua- ratus, equipment, and books. This request has been sympathetical- ly received and there is hope that a sum of 0150,00 annually will be provided. The new buildings and the old ones will require additional equipment before they can be used effectively. The 3. acquirement by the Library of many State documents reouires at once a considerable construction of stacks to provide storage for this material. The present Library completed a few years ago is now nearly filled, unless storage can be found elsewhere. At the last meeting of the Executive Committee the basement of Memorial Hall was designated for that purpose. The problem of storage grows with new accessions to the library, but tnis may be solved by using new photographing devices and storing the films which may be shown by projectors. The cost of such equip- ment is lees than $1,000. While I am speaking of films I may call attention to the new demands made upon the Department of University Extension. For some time this department has collected films usually given to it by some industrial concern, but the new development of teaching films is bringing to the University from all parts of the State requests to rent films for school purposes. The University has no sound equipment, but it is asked to buy and recommend such equipment, so that standard sets may be used in the State. To finance this important work would cost 6,000. The needs of other departments for equipmentare Dressing heavily upon the budget of the University. The Department of Physics is better housed than it has been in the past, but it needs equipment. The same is true of Chemistry; while Bacteriol- ogy will be better housed in the partly completed Biological Sci- ences building, its equipment is old and in many instances obso- lete. Other science departments are in need of greater sums for their annual supplies. Home Economics as a department has never had the space required to do the best work, and if there is a de- partment that needs space this is one, a need recognized in plac- ing its requests in the urgent capital list presented to the coming legislature, The most amazing growth in numbers of students is to be seen In the College of Conunerce which now has 620 regis- trants. Hroused in White Hall, a former dormitory known to all of the older alumni, it shares these quarters with the Department of Botany. This college is cramped and its usefulness hampered by inadequate quarters. The removal of the Department of Botany to other quarters will help the situation, but not adequately. The Agricultural College has passed the 500 mark In enrollment, which in itself is gratifying but calls for additions to teaching staff, Housing of Students In the early history of the University when it was a state college, an attempt was made to house all the students who came from outside of Lexington, As the University has grown this de- sirable policy could no longer be followed, and students were forced to find living quarters outside of the oampus, To house the 2700 students who live outside of Fayette County is impossi- ble for many years to come, but the University must provide enough housing facilities to maintain standards and keep prices down. 4. To that end two dormitories were placed in the capital list. As things look at this writing, it is doubtful if the funds can be had for their construction. It is, however, possible to finance a building for the women from the earnings of the present and the new building since there is no debt against the women's halls. I am, therefore, recommending that plans both for building and fi- nancing be authorized at this meeting so an addition may be made to Boyd Hall. By completing the fourth story of Boyd Hall and adding a wing, about 140 women can be accommodated in the hall, in addition to those already living there, The buildinx can be financed on a 5% basis and the income would carry the interest and the amortization charges. Indebtedness Twenty years ago the UnIversity had a small current debt and no bonded obligations. Times have changed and under federal and state legislation, building operations have been undertaken with borrowed money. The construction of two residence halls for men in 1926, the building q ogram of the past year, and the pur- chase of the warehouse and two minor buildings, explain the indebtedness of the University today. As a matter of information, a table of' the present debt is included in this report. Statement of Indebtedness Cost Debt Residence Halls Two 1926 8270,000 5198,577 Warehouse Purchase 1930 120,000 45,300 New Constructions 1936-1937 1,100,000 619,000 Experiment Station Annex 1936-1937 915,000 12,000 Laboratory 1936-1937 11 000 11 000 $ 1,594,000 * 885,857 Provision has been made for the debt in each instance, so that in the course of ten years all obligations will be met, except the present bond issue, which continues for twenty years more (1966). The addition of $150,000 to the debt would not make it unwieldy. The Justification for such financing is to be found in the inabil- ity of the University to secure funds from current appropriations. New Buildings I reported to the Board of Trustees at a meeting last year that the sum or 825,000 had been given to the University for the purpose of carrying on research in the field of eye diseases of horses, and another *q5,000 was given by other donors. The University found it quite impossible to carry on this work without an addi- tion to its laboratory space, so a temporary building was author- ized at a meeting of the Executive Committee October 20. In the long run, the work cannot proceed satisfactorily without space, and for that purpose $150,000 was asked, so that an adequate building can be constructed. This is Can example of what I 5. referred to in previous pages as an important demand made upon the University for research. I should like to have the Board give this matter consideration, and I am sure they will do so sympathetically. The building program which was inaugurated last year is Dro- ceeding apace at the present time. Three buildings have been accepted, a fourth is completed and the Student Union building will pvssibly be finished in three more months. This leaves one building under construction. This building known as Biological Hall will remain two-thirds unconstructed until some future time. The first third now under construction should be ready some time during the summer. The difficult procedures with the numerous contracts numbering about 59, as well as the relations with the State and Federal authorities have been carried on with effective- ness under the direction of James H. Graham, as set up in the College of Engineering. Inspections During the past year the University has been under inspection by three different agencies. These agencies have to do with engineering, library science and music. The reports upon the latter two have not been made, but the one upon the Engineering College has been received. In this report two courses in the College of Engineering were omitted from approval in mechanical engineering. The committee that made the report passed the other courses upon a two years basis, and will return later to inspect the courses. The policy which the University has been following in the past generation has been to emphasize shop work, and to omit from the courses work in the fields of economics and the so- cial sciences. The committee found also considerable inbreeding, overloading of instructors and low salaries. Their report was based upon the catalog of 1934-35, and the changes made since then were not given the consideration they should have been given. This committee criticized also the work done in chemistry, indi- cating that it is too elementary and intimating that the instruc- tion may not be as good as it might be. All these matters are before the College of Engineering and it is hoped that another year when the College is housed in its own new buildings, much of the chaos of the last two years will be removed and perhaus the necessary changes made toward meeting the requirements of the committee. It is hoped that inbreeding, overloading, and low salaries will be eliminated. Another inspection has been made recently in the work carried on in the Department of Ilbsic. This inspection arises out of the application of the Department to the National Association of Music Schools. The report has not yet been received at the University, but will be received in the near future. A study is being made by Professor van de Wall in connection with the work offered by the Department and its relation to the comniunity and is well under way and bearing some fruit. Out of this should come results that are helpful and of a far-reaching character. 6. The third Inspection referred to above which took place in the same week in December was made by the American Library Asso- ciation. The University is pressing its claims for recognition as an institution doing one full year of work in library science. The outcome of this inspection is important to the University, because it puts it in or out of the list of recognized institu- tions. The maintenance of standards requires some addition to staff and some expenditure of money for books. In Engineering it will be necessary to provide what the College has never had: a considerable amnount of equipment, if the plans now in mind are carried out. In the Department of Miusic there is need for a considerable number of books, and the same statement applies to Library Science. The Music Department is handicapped for lack of space. It is crowded already and any new growth is impossible. The members of the staff have been patient and cooperative under very difficult circumstances. The New Commons In the construction of the Student Union building nrovision has been made to transfer the Commons to that builcing. In the past year I have been endeavoring to find out thru the assistance of Mr. Shropshire, Mr. Peak and the managers what it costs to car- ry on these enterprises. It is hoped from the studies being made that we can find out the facts about our difficulties, be able to meet them and to prevent losses. The advice and recom- mendations of Mrs. Natalie MacIntosh, a nationally recognized food expert from New York, have been sought. She comes to the Uni- versity all the week of December 6, and should give us some ade- quate ideas of how to proceed. Definite suggestions should be made in connection with the management of the Commons. Care of the Campus One matter which has been brought to the attention of the Executive Committee from time to time has been that of the care of the campus, so that some order and better procedure may follow in the making of walks and roads and the planting of trees and shrubs. I have appointed a committee comoosed of N. R. Elliott, chairman; M. J. Crutcher, and D. V. Terrell, This committee has brought to my attention quite forcibly the need to feed trees on the campus. They have been neglected, many have been lost, and unless action is taken in the next few years, more trees will be lost. They estimate it will cost in the neighborhood of 83,000. They also suggest some new planting and a definite boundary which shall be restricted by the Botanic Garden. The committee has recommended that it be extended from the walk which toes north from White Hall thou the area south of the stadium to Rose Street. This is a considerable area and would require care involving an- nual expenditures, and the committee on the Botanic Garden has asked the University to budget the sum of O1200 a year for the maintenance of the garden. Unless something is done the garden grows steadily less attractive. 7. Departmental Reorganization There are other matters that might be brought to the atten- tion of the Board at this time. These relate to the instruction- al side of the University work. For some time we have been dis- cussing a more definite organization of what we call the upper and lower levels of the College of Arts and Sciences. There is a considerable group of the ninth and tenth decile students who are a definite college risk. We have been placing these students under the direction of an adviser, Mr. Lysle Croft, and something quite definite has been done in improving the standing of these students. In some institutions a definiWe college has been set up with two year courses for students who will not go on farther. This college in the Univerwity of Minnesota is now in the fourth or fifth year, and some experience has come out of this college which may be helpful here. In the College of Engineering fresh- man students are required to spend a certain amount of time in study hall each day. This has been helpful. The faculty is en- deavoring to deal with such problems in a definite way. Conclusion So I come to the conclusion of a rather long report, ihich deals with some of the problems of the University. I have not discussed the financial situation, since the University is under the biennial budget, and has carried on under the provisions of that budget. It is always a matter of anxiety as to how we will come out, and every endeavor is made to keep the institution with- in the income. The University has made a number of contributions to the wel- fare of the State, especially thru the services of the members of its staff, who are giving time and effort to the problems which are brought to their attention. Recently the Department of Wel- fare asked the College of Agriculture to make an extensive survey of its lands, in connection with the rotation of crops, and the working out of a long time plan, so as to improve the land and pro-- vide enlarged production from its farms. The committee has some data and has gone forward with plans that will be satisfactory and helpful. 3. Financial Report The financial report for November 1937 was filed by the Bus. iness Agent. It was examined by the Committee and was ordered inserted in the Minutes. 8. Statement of Income and Expenditures Month of November 1937 Previously Reported Current Month General Fund Income Fed. Appro.-Morrill-Nelson Vocational Ed. Board State Appro.-Summer School Special Agr. Appro. State Appro.-General State Appro.-Repairs to Bldgs. Federal Appro.-Bankhead- Jones Student Fees Student Fees - Sum. Sch. Student Fees - U.H.S. Student Fees - El.Tr.Sch. Student Fees - Un. Exten. Miscellaneous Receipts Rentals Men's Dormitories Total Expenditures Instruction Administration Exp. & Maintenance Additions and Betterments Total Excess of Income over Ex- penditures Patterson Hall Income Board Miscellaneous Receipts Room Rent - Summer School Total Expenditures Expense Excess of Income over Ex-a penditures General Ledger Income General Ledger Expenditures 5,713.33 7, 413. 23 8,000.00 8,000.00 221,290.96 3,910.58 3,924.99 119,016.20 62,288.15 4,730.00 3,760.00 5,251.18 2,434.45 308.00 8. 322 24 5,713.33 3,041.70 2;000.00 85,803.43 369.45 3,924.99 4,671.29 30.50 105.00 170.00 2,407.15 445.19 415.00 568.59 11,426 66 10,454 93 8,000 00 10,000.00 307,094.39 4,280.03 7,849.98 123,687.49 62,318.65 4,835.00 3,9930.00 7,658.33 2, 879. 64 723.00 8. 390. 83 464, 363. 3 1 100,665.62 574,028.93 262,251.29 77,455.35 339,706.64 82,474.66 37,137.82 112,612.48 6,145.50 3,392~12 95 6 _350,871.45 117,985.29 468,856.74 113, 491.8{6 _(a ,319. 67 ) 15172.19 15,835.40 14,097.00 20,932.40 .50 .50 1,932.56 1,932.56 17,768.46 14,097.00 31,865.46 8,195.65 2,268.70 10,464.35 9, 57281 11,828.30 21,401.11 482,131.77 123,762.62 605,894,39 359,067.10 120,253. 99 479,321^09 Excess of General Fund Income over Expenditures 123,064.67 Excess of Expenditures over Receipts for General Ledger accounts (102,906.48) Accounts Payable (190802. 10 Excess of Expenditures over Receirpts for the Fiscal Year to Date - General Fu;0( 3,508.63 126,573.30 (8,947.19) (111,853.67) 19,802.19 (5,438) (5M082L.56 Fiscal Year to Date 9. Excess of Expenditures over Receipts for the fiscal year to date - General Fund Cash in Bank July 1, 1937 - General Fund Cash in Bank November 31, 1937 - General Fund Experiment Station Income Hatch - Federal. Appro. 7,500.00 Milk and Butter - Cash Re- ceipts 3,448.45 Beef Cattle Sales 73.00 Dairy Cattle Sales 580.13 Sheep Sales 546.50 Swine Sales 117.73 Poultry Sales 543.22 Farm Produce Sales 502.47 Horticultural Sales 812.27 Seed Test 317.75 Seed Inspection 9,145.55 Rentals 478.68 Miscellaneous 154.35 Fertilizer - Fees 17,877.50 Public Service - State Appro. 6,776.88 Public Service - Misc.Rec. 20.00 Feeding Stuffs - Fees 22,142.27 Adams - Federal Aopro, 7,500.00 Serum - Sales 1,354.29 Serum - Virus Sales 131.95 Serum - Supply Sales 70.57 Serum - Misc. Receipts 25. 51 State Appro. 16,144.49 Creamery - License Fees 9,437.46 Creamery - Testers Licenses 2,049.89 Creamery - Glassware Tested 292.97 Robinson - State Appro. 4,013.72 Robinson - Misc. Receipts 1,295.10 West Ky. - State Appro. 5,475.49 Wuest Ky. - Misc. Receipts 6,377.24 Purnell Federal Appro. 30,000.00 Bankhead-Jones - Fed. Appro. 29,601.76 (5,082, .56) 89,70"3S 13 84,705, .5 7 7 ,5 01..0 857.79 4,3306.24 73.00 171.94 752.07 546.50 117.73 109.41 652.63 109.78 612.25 207.75 1,020.02 106.62 424.37 879.76 10,025.31 94.67 573.35 13.29 157,64 725.00 18,602,50 1,881.56 8,658,44 35.00 55.00 4,790.64 26,932.91 7,500.00 171.80 1,526.09 12.48 144.43 3.50 74.07 25.51 2,515.50 18,659.09 64.50 9,501.96 66.00 2,115.89 14.90 307.87 1,871.78 5,885.50 239.94 1,535.04 894.38 6,369.87 398.96 6,776.20 30,000.00 29,601.76 Nursery Inspection - State Appro. Nursery Inspection - Fees total Expenditures Expense Additions and Betterments Total 720.00 1,380.00 186, 907, 19 180.00 190.00 16,606.95 900.00 1,570.00 203, b14.14 123,483.74 38,028.06 161,511.80 3,727,61--_ 690.12 4,417,73 127,211.35 38,718.18 165,929.53 10. Excess of Income over Ex- penditures 5 Excess of Receipts over Expend. for General Ledger accounts Accounts Payable (1 Excess of Receipts over Expenditures 4 Excess of Receipts over Expenditures for the fiscal year to date - Experiment Station Cash In Bank July 1, 1937 - Experiment Station Cash in Bank November 30, 19! Experiment Station Extension Division Income Federal Bankhead-Jones I Federal Smith-Lever Federal Supplementary Federal Capper-Ketcham State Smith-Lever County and Other Total Expenditures Expense Excess of Income over Expenditures 9,695.84 l830 I 1 R. or (22,111.23) 37,584,61 3,434.35 5,515.65 ..(1It; 7- C; Q .L * ovtJL . 6#JJ ;__i_________________/ 8,241.89 (18,676.88) 29,565.01 29,5G5 01 37~~~~~~b _7 bE05?,46 .83,365.25 183,365,25 74,154.38 74,154,38 13,272.76 13,272.76 18,400.49 18,400.49 43,403.37 11,252.91 54,656.28 5,274.16 4,341.93 9 616 09 337,870.41 15,594.884 353,465.25 225,592.14 54,901.64 282,493,78 112278. 27 j41,306.80) 70, 971. 47 Excess of Income over Ex- penditures for the fiscal year to date - Extension Division Cash in Bank July 1, 1937 - Extension Division Cash in Bank November 30, 1937 - Extension Division Trust Fund Income Student Loan Fund Student Notes Paid Total Receipts 801.29 642.41 1,443.70 Expenditures Expense Student Notes 100.00 Total Expenditures 100.00 Excess of Receipts over Expenditures 1,343.70 Excess of Receipts over Ex- penditures for the fiscal year to date - Trust Fund Cash in Bank July 1, 1937 Trust Fund Cash in Bank November 30, 1937 - Trust 70,971.47 2,672.00 313.57 1,114.86 368.23 1,010 4 681.80 24125.50 9.00 9.03 25.00 125,0O 34.00 134. 00 647.80 1,2991. 0 1,991.50 4,267,53 Fund 6,259.03 _.- - -11, .. . __. --t - I 11. Summary General Fund Income Experiment Station Inc. Extension Division Inc. Trust Fund Income Total General Fund Expend. Experiment Sta.Expend. Extension Div. Expend. Trust Fund Expend. Total Excess of Income over Expenditures Accounts Payable 482,131.77 186,907.19 337,870.41 801.29 1 007,710.66 359,067.10 127,211.35 225,592.14 711.8?0. 59- 295,840.07 (31, 337,44) Excess of Expenditures over Receipts for General Ledger accounts (102,825.18) Student Loan Fund Notes_ Excess of Receipts over Ex- penditures for the fiscal year to date - Combined Fund 1 542.41 62,219.86 123,762 a62 16,606. 95 15,594.84 605,894.39 203,514.14 353,465.25 313.57 1,114.86 156,277.98 1, 1363, 986. 4 120,253.90 479,321,09 38,718.18 165,929.X3 56,901.64 282, 493.78 9.00 9.00 215,882.81 927,753.40 (59,604.83) 236,235.24 (31,337.44) (5,512.84) (108,338.02) 343.23 885.64 (64, 774. 44) 97 445.42 Excess of Receipts over Ex- penditures for the fiscal year to date - Combined Fund 97,445.42 Cash in Bank and on hand July 1, 1937 - Combined Fund Cash in Bank and on hand November 30, 1937 - Combined Fund 222 . 845.M? Abstract of item shown on Statement of Income and Expenditures as "Excess of Expenditures over Receipts for Gen- eral Ledger accounts $108,338.02" Debit Cred't Accounts Receivable Sundry Account 8 10O,474,06 100,474.06 1,136.04 108,338,02 1.136.04 125,400.11 ''2 4. Requisition Committee Report The Requisition Committee filed written report of its action each week from November 18, 1937, to December 8, 1937, inclusive. The report showed orders made by the Business Office on the au- thority of the Requisition Committee in the manner prescribed by the Board of Trustees and State laws, running from No. 3292 to No. 3700. The report was examined, and on motion and second the orders named therein were ratified and approved and payment on said orders were authorized and approved, The following additional budget aupropriations were aoproved and allowed: Heating Plant, 8292.20; Business Office, desks, $62.66. 5. Budget for Next Biennium Discussed. President McVey presented the following consolidated state- ment of requests far appropriations for the University of Ken- tucky for biennium 1938-1940, made to State Division of Budgets. He commented on the University's needs of such appropriations, but stated that due to the condition of State finances, favorable action on the requests in entirety is not probable. General discussion followed. CONSOLIDATED STATENENT BUDGET FOR BIENNIUM 1938 -- 1940 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY Next Biennium COLLEGES 1936-38 Now 1938-39 1939-40 General Support : 660,000 : 993,240 993,240 Summer Session : 8,000 20,000 20,000 Repairs : 8,000 : 45,000 : 45,000 Agr. Courses 24,000 30,000 30,000 Capital Outlay, Equipment & Builds.: 586,760 416,760 Total 700,000 1,675X000 :1,05,000 EXPERIMENT STATION _ 'General Support 48,000 : 60,000 : 60,000 Public Service Labs: 21,000 27,000 27,000 Nursery Inspection : 2,000 2,000 : 2,000 Princeton Substa. : 14,000 : 20,000 20,000 Quicksand Substa. : 14,000 20,000 20,000 Capital Outlay Buildings . 150,000 : 20,000 Total 99,000 279,000 149 000 - 13. BUDGET FOR BIENNIUM, 1938-40, (Continued) * 1936-38 (Now) Next Biennium 1938-39 1939-40 Agricultural Ex- : 8120,000 . $155,000 : f155,000 tension;Maintenance and Support These amounts are in addition to University revolving funds. 6. Student Loan Fund Investment. Letters from Mr. Gordon: December 9, 1937 Senator D. H. Peak Business Agent University of Kentucky Lexington, Ky. Dear Senator Peak: I have your letter of November 24th, enclosing Stu- dent Loan Fund Report revised as of October 31, 1937. At the last meeting of the Executive Committee, I promised to attempt to get some recommendations from some men in Louisville whose advice in investment matters is generally good, as to how the University should invest the cash of something more than $18,000 which is now in the Fund, From inquiries which I have made, I rather think that the best thing to do is to leave the cash item of 813,000 on deposit at inter