xt7n028pgj3z https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7n028pgj3z/data/mets.xml Kentucky. Department of Education. Kentucky Kentucky. Department of Education. 1933-04 volumes: illustrations 23-28 cm. call numbers 17-ED83 2 and L152 .B35. bulletins English Frankford, Ky. : Dept. of Education This digital resource may be freely searched and displayed in accordance with U. S. copyright laws. Educational Bulletin (Frankfort, Ky.) Education -- Kentucky Educational Bulletin (Frankfort, Ky.), vol. I, no. 2, April 1933 text Educational Bulletin (Frankfort, Ky.), vol. I, no. 2, April 1933 1933 1933-04 2021 true xt7n028pgj3z section xt7n028pgj3z . 0 Commonwealth of Kentucky 0 SWEPUCATIONAL BULLETIN. IN THIS ISSUE— ' Page Functional Reorganization of the State Department of Education by James H. Richmond 3 The System of Public Education in Kentucky .................................................. 9 vSuperintcndent Calls Conferences to Discuss Educational Problems ........ 14 Report on Progress of the Kentucky Educational Commission by James W. Cammack, Jr. 15 Typical Disparities in Financial Support of the Public Schools .................. 16 Published By in». DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ' JAMES H. RICHMOND, Superintendent of Public Instruction ISSUED MONTHLY EXCEPT JUNE, JULY, AUGUST Application Pending for. Entry as Second Class Matter at Frankfort, Ky. Vol. 1 0 April, 1933 0 No. 2 UBWTRY iiNiVERSiTY 0i: KE ii’i‘iiflii‘f 11' :" . Co F“: I ORGANIZATION FOR EFFECTIVE SERVICE Education is the most important and far—reaching responsibility of our Commonwealth. No other agency of government affects the lives of as many people as the public schools. It is of primary im— portance, therefore, that there be an effective and economical plan of organization of the agencies engaged in public education. Recommendations will be made by the Kentucky Educational Commission looking toward the reorganization, in this Common— wealth, of public education at all levels along these lines. Undoubt- edly, there are many instances where the consolidation of small school districts and small schools with larger districts and larger schools will effect significant economies. In keeping with former announcements which I have made, and the general program of the Kentucky Educational Commission, we have effected a functional reorganization of the State Department of Education to the end that the services of this office may be more far- reaching and more economically performed. The accompanying article explains this reorganization. The last section of the article will show, graphically, how the existing divisions of the State Department of Education have been grouped for the performance of (A) general services and (B) special advisory and supervisory services. In the first classification are found the services performed by the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Assistant Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Director in charge of the Division of Public Relations, and the services of the closely allied divisions of Research and Statistics, and School Records and Reports. In the second classification fall the services of (1) the various supervisory divisions of the Department, which include the associated divisions of Rural School Supervision, High School Supervision, Li- brary Service and Negro Education, all four having to do with public school supervision; (2) the related divisions of Teacher Training and Certification and Examination; and (3) the virtually consolidated divisions of Finance and Inspection and Accounting. It is apparent already that the State Department of Education will function more efficiently under this plan of organization. ' JAMES H. RICHMOND, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Frankfort, Kentucky. ion, The Functional Reorganization of the State Department of Education By JAMES H. RICHMOND Superintendent of Public Instruction According to the provisions of Section 4396—6 of Kentucky Stat- utes, the following divisions of the State Department of Education are included Within the departmental organization: 1. Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, with one Assist- ant Superintendent of Public Instruction, who is authorized to act in the absence of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Division of Statistics, School Records and Reports. Division of Inspection and Accounting. Division of Certification and Examination. Division of Rural School Supervision. Division of High School Supervision. Division of Negro Education. Division of Vocational Education. The Superintendent of Public Instruction may provide for ad- ditional departments as efficiency of service to the State may de- mand, Within the limits'of the funds available for such service. $090,499???" Under the provisions of “9” above, the following divisions have been added: Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Division of School Buildings and Grounds. Division of Research. Division of Finance. Division of Teacher Training. Division of Public Relations. Division of School Library Service (after July I, 1933). qsrbsvpapsrs These titles imply the type of service to be performed by the respective divisions. The statutory set-up of divisions, including the newer divisions created in the reorganization of the State Department, may be an- alyzed and described in terms of the functional services which they render. On a broad basis, these services may be grouped into the 1wo main types of work performed by the staff of the Department: 3 1!" WP II. III. .f. General Services. Special Advisory and Supervisory Services. Under “A”, we have the three following functions: . General administration and supervision of the system of Educa- tion within the Commonwealth, and the State Department of Education, in relation to the school system of the State. Promotion of the educational welfare of the children of the Com~ monwealth in providing leadership for the cause of education, and in interpreting to the public the actual work of the schools. This service has to do with publicity and the arranging of various types of local, regional, and state conferences in the interests of the advancement of education. Continuous study of state and local school problems through scientific research. This involves the systematic gathering of school data, the securing of superintendents’ annual reports and various other kinds of school statistics. This type of service in- cludes the making of surveys and the supplying of technical sta- tistical advice and scientific direction on research projects carried out by members of the department. Under “B”, we have: . Advisory and supervisory services in relation to the educational administration of the schools and the problems connected with instruction. The two branches of this division include (a) the problems of the schools as instruments of education with their administrative and instructional facilities, and (b) problems with respect to the training and certification of teachers. The performance of the functions under (a) demands a con- siderable amount of field work and, therefore, requires a number of supervisors, each of which is professionally equipped for some special branch of supervision, as, for example, the Public School Supervisor, the Supervisor of Buildings and Grounds, the Super- visor of Vocational Training. The functions covered under (b) fall into three divisions: (1) working with all institutions in the state which are engaged in the training of teachers in order to develop proper curricula for the various types of teaching positions needed in the state; (2) the setting up of proper principles for the certification of teachers and seeing to it that they are carried out in practice through the issuance of certificates; (3) studying the problems of teachers in service to discover whether or not their training is deficient and making proper arrangements for the continued growth of teachers in service. .m. 4 1—!er l 2‘5 )1in SD P—Iu bade .W. II. Advisory and supervisory services in relation to the financial ad- ministration of the public schools call for: (1) auditing and in- specting the records and accounts of school boards; (2) ascertain- ing Whether the provisions of laws having to do with school finances are being carried out; (8) advising with boards in the preparation of financial plans. Another phase of this type of service calls for the keeping of accurate accounts of all funds used in the State Department of Education. All of the types of services mentioned herein are necessary and essential to the carrying out ofi (1) the mandate of the State Con- stitution— “The General Assembly shall by appropriate legislation provide for an efficient system 01' common schools throughout the state." (Section 183, Kentucky Constitution.) and (2) the provisions of the laws of the state relating to the schools. In the following outline the various divisions as provided for by the Kentucky Statutes, including the added divisions, are classified in terms of the functional services given above. Outline of Organization of the State Department of Education In charge: The Superintendent of Public Instruction. A. General Services I. Superintendent of Public Instruction and Assistant Super- intendent. II. Division of Public Relations. III. 1. Division of Research. 2. Division of Statistics, School Records and Reports. B. Special Advisory and Supervisory Services I. Educational. 1. The Schools. Division of Rural School Supervision. Division of High School Supervision. . Division of Negro Education. DivisiOn of Vocational'Education; » Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Division of School Buildings and Grounds. Division of School Library Service. q: rm 9:9 9‘?" 2. Teachers. a. Division of Teacher Training. b. Division of Certification and Examination. II. Financial. 1. Division of Finance. 2. Division of Inspection and Accounting. RECENT LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES AFFECTING SCHOOLS In View of the crisis facing education in the United States, much interest has been centered on measures designed to protect public education. Here are a few of the most recent developments: National: 73rd Congress. Introduced : S. 12. Senator Nye. To aid in reduction of taxes on farm lands and to promote elementary education in rural areas of the United States. Referred to Education and Labor Committee. State: g Illinois—Adopts 3 per cent sales tax. Alabama—“With the prospect of relief through an extraordi- nary session of the Legislature, now convened for the purpose, many of the schools are reopening.”—A. F. Harman, State Superintendent. New York—Representatives of State teachers indicate they will urge adoption of luxury and amusement taxes to escape a cut in State aid to education. Estimated: New taxes of this type will bring in $40,000,000. State Aid: Washington—A new system of financing education whereby State will meet approximately 50 per cent of total cost adopted. New Jersey—Governor Moore announces a tentative plan to allow counties to divert to school support and shore-line protection $6,- 835,000 from motor vehicle receipts hitherto dedicated to local high- way maintenance. .—. FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP OF THE SERVICES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION A. GENERAL SERVICE. I. Superintendent of Public Instruction and Assistant Superintendent James H. Richmond, Superintendent Public Instruction. lGordie Young, Assistant Superintendent Public Instruction. II. Division of Public Relations. W. C. Bell, Director. III. 1. Division of Research. James W. Cammack, Jr., Director. 2. Division of Statistics, School Records and Reports. Moss Walton, Director. B. SPECIAL ADVISORY AND SUPERVISORY SERVICE. I. Educational 1. The Schools. ,a. Division of Rural School Supervision. O. J. Jones, Supervisor. b. Division of High School Supervision. Mark Godman, Supervisor. 0. Division of Negro Education. L. N. Taylor, State School Agent. (1. Division of School Library Service. Ruth Theobald, Supervisor. e. Division of School Buildings and Grounds. John W. Brooker, Director. Hugh Meriwether, Consulting Architect. 33. Division of Vocational Education. G. Ivan Barnes. Director. F. G. Burd, Supervisor Agricultural Education. Ata Lee, Supervisor Home Economics Education. A. N. May, Supervisor Trade and Industrial Education. g. Divis‘Ion of Vocational Rehabilitation. Homer W. Nichols, Director. Cleveland Moore, Supervisor. Olney M. Patrick, Supervisor. 2. Teachers. a. Division of Teacher Training. R. E. Jaggers, Director. b. Division of Certification. A. P. Taylor, Director. II. Financial. 1. Division of Finance. F. D. Peterson, Director. Harold Eades, Bookkeeper. , J. Virgil Chapman, Clerk. 2. Division of Inspection and Accounting. J. C. Mills, Auditor and Inspector. .fl. 7 xv” RELATIO‘J OF THE S'UPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION TO STATE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION _ _ _ _ I. ______ . _____________ r _ _. _ .. Two L STATE ECAHD OF EDUCATION Normal I Boards ——————————————————— School : Collegesl Board of Trustees,University.Lexington' Executive 1 “6:32” 50317133565 sf‘nzgentstmzashgrs 6033535; _G°_un_°1_1_' L — 9 — — 1 Bowling Grsen.Morehead,Murray.Rlchmond' m ' |St.College -9xt Book I LFEsnkfort @m_mi_ss_10_u_l Ina“ Ky_ Superintendent State Board' Indus'wial P blic Igstructi n °f ljaiiu‘iah_ ESSistant 5.1:.1? Examineru Staff . 560‘” s . Sc 9“” County Schools 001g 8 Boards 120 bOO )#20 Members Boards Members w 192 m Boards G) J) Teachers m 960 Teachers '5 Members Elementary 5' o 2 14 p m 3 7 Elena t r S g Teachers 3.5. luoh ; “0'3 Y j; H E1. 1030 . 97 g H.s.,629 'U ‘ t, I High School '° Pupils Pupils 1309 V g . 31. 145166 Elementary 3.3.1h150 133352 Pupils ms. 32679 Elementary . V 372850 High School - 25372 This chart details the relation of the Superintendent of Public Instruc- tion to the public elementary, high school and institutions of higher learning of the Commonwealth. Statistical data are based upon reports of otficials for school year ended June 30, 1932. THE SYSTEM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION 1 IN KENTUCKY This article describes Kentucky’s system of public education as it exists today. No attempt is made to suggest changes, because all phases of public education in Kentucky are now being carefully studied by the Educational Commission. Its final report will point the path toward greater efficiency and economy in public school ad- ministration. v Whatever recommendations the Commission may make in its final report, it is important that thinking people throughout the State should give attention to the facts. In the end, the general public must pass judgment on the report and must act in the best interests of the public schools. The Superintendent of Tile official direcltfly chaggedK witth kthe - - e ucationa we are 0 en uc y’s PUbhc InStrudmn 700,000 children is the Superintendent of Public Instruction, who is elected every four years by popular vote. Responsibility for the administration of the program of public educa- tion is imposed upon him by the Constitution and Statutes. Chapter 58, Acts of 1924, vests authority in the Superintendent to name as- sistants necessary for the legitimate administration of the public schools. After providing for the manner in which the Superintendent of Public Instruction shall qualify and assume ofi’ice, this Chapter of the Acts enumerates some sixty specific duties to be carried out by the Superintendent or, through his direction, by his staff members. Other Acts of the General Assembly impose upon this official a hundred or more specific duties not included in Chapter 58, Acts of 1924. Generally speaking, the duties of the Superintendent are of two kinds— (1) Those having to do with the general administration of the public elementary and high schools, and (2) Those having to do with the various state boards of which he is a 'm'e’m’her. ' “ - , a . . The Three Types of léefore the service rendered through the No. School Districts State Department of Education touches fling the interest of the. 700,000 children in 5m“ the public schools, it must travel a somewhat complicated route. Ad- ministrative procedure emanating from the State Department of Ed— m . C . ,r ,- ucation is relayed first to public school administrators of the 380 school districts. They, in turn, refer the problems thus received to their respective boards of education for instruction in relaying them to the principals and teachers of their elementary and high schools. For administrative purposes, there are three types of school dis- tricts—city school districts, graded school districts, and county school. districts. All three types of districts may be located in a single county. For example, there are four city school districts, four graded school districts, and one county school district in Campbell County. All educational service emanating from the State Department of Edn- cation, before actually touching the interests of the children, must proceed through the administrative officers of the 380 school districts in the State. City School The type of organization provided for city school Districts districts is perhaps the simplest and most direct plan afforded for administration of any of the State’s public schools. Cities of the first, second, third, and fourth classes are organized as administrative school units, each class operat- ing under a charter provided by the legislature. Charters for city school systems provide that the board of education of a first or second class city shall consist of five members; of each third class city, nine members; and of each fourth class city, six members. Members of city boards are elected at large from the school district; the board of education, in turn, selects the city superintendent. In determining the administrative program relating to city school districts, the Superintendent of Public Instruction directs his activities through fifty-three boards of education of fourth class cities, nine boards of education of third class cities, five boards of education of second class cities, and one board of edw cation of a first class city. Thus, the cooperation of sixty-eight city school superintendents and 429 members of boards of edu— cation is involved in the administration of problems related to the interests of the children in city schools. During the school year ended June 30, 1932, city boards of edu— cation employed 3,274 elementary teachers and 1,404 high school teachers. There were enrolled in the city schools 123,352 elementary school pupils and 32,679 high school pupils. City boards of educa- tion collectively realized from district taxation an average of ap- proximately $38.97 per census pupil. This was used to supplement the state school per capita. Graded School Each independent graded school district was Districts formerly provided for by a special Act of the General Assembly. Ultimately an Act was passed setting up uniform conditions under which such districts may be established. The schools of each independent graded school district are administered by a board of trustees, consisting of five members, elected by popular vote from the district at large. In rendering service legally required for the 192 graded school districts, the Superintendent of Public Instruction must proceed through 1.0.2 boards of trustees, having a total member- ship of .960. With few executions, the boards of trustees of graded school dis- tricts employ principals for nine school months, thus leaving more than three calendar months without any assistance from trained ad- ministrators. The responsibility for rendering reports required by law, for looking after the common interests and general welfare of the graded school districts, and for formulating, advocating, and carrying out policies and programs of the public schools, rests alto- gether upon boards of trustees during the vacation months. Fre- quently, the Superintendent of Public Instruction cannot prevail on the secretaries of these boards to prepare and file reports revealing results of the year’s work and conditions in these graded school dis- tricts. During the school year ended. June 30, 1932, boards of trustees of graded school districts employed 1,030 elementary school teachers and 629 high school teachers. There were enrolled 45,166 elementary school pupils and 14,150 high school pupils. The graded school dis- tricts realized from district taxation an average of $25.53 per census pupil. It was used to supplement the state school per capita derived from statewide taxation. County School All the territory in a county lying outside the Districts city School districts and graded school districts is included in the county school district. There are 120 county school districts. Each has a superintendent, employed by a county board of education consisting of five members. The county is divided into five educational districts. One board member is elected from each district. With one exception, problems relating to the county school dis- tricts are administered by the county boards of education. The authority to nominate elementary teachers to be employed by county boards of education is vested“ in subdistrict trustees, three elected at Or. large for each subdistrict in a county. The teacher or teachers in each subdistrict are nominated by its subdistrict trustees. There are, in Kentucky, 6,650 subdistricts: 15,426 subdistrict trustees employ one teacher for each of 5,142 subdistrlcts. . 2,754 subdlstrict trustees employ two teachers for each of 918 sub- districts. ~ 564 subdistrict trustees employ three teachers for each of 188 sub- districts. Thus, 19,950 subdistrict trustees in the 120 county school dis- tricts are vested with authority to name the 9,970 elementary teachers employed in these schools. ‘ In discharging legally imposed duties pertaining to the, county school districts, the Superintendent of Public Instruction must proceed through 120 county superintendents, 600 members of county boards of education, and 19,950 subdistrict trustees. County boards of education employed 9,970 elementary school teachers and 1,309 high school teachers during the school year ended June 30, 1932. There were 372,850 elementary school pupils and 25,372 high school pupils enrolled in these schools. The 120 county school districts collectively realized from district taxation an average of approximately $13.70 per census pupil. It was used to supplement the state school per capita derived from state-Wide taxation. The Superintendent’s Aside from the many duties pertaining Ex-Oflicio Duties directly to the administration of. the public elementary and public high schools, the Superintendent of Public Instruction is, by virtue of his oflice, Chairman of the following Boards: 1. The State Board of Education. 2. The State Board for Vocational Education. '3. The Board of Regents of Eastern State Teachers College, Richmond. 4. The Board of. Regents of Western State Teachers College, Bowling Green. . The Board of Regents of Murray State Teachers College, Murray. 6. The Board of Regents of Morehead State Teachers College, Morer ~head.~v ....- 7. The Board of Trustees of Kentucky State Industrial College for Colored Persons, Frankfort. 8. The Board of Trustees of West Kentucky Industrial College for Colored Persons, Paducah. 9. The State Board of Examiners. 10. The Normal School Executive CounciL 01 .M. 12 .—. He is a. member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Kentucky and Secretary of the State Textbook COmmission. WHAT OUR PRESIDENTS SAY ABOUT EDUCATION CALVIN COOLIDGE: “If there is one thing more than another a citizen has a right to demand from organized society, it is education. ” “Education for the children of all the people, extending from the primary grades through the university, constitutes America’s noblest contribution to civilization. No child or youth in the United States need to be deprived of the benefits of education suited to his age and degree of advancement.” FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT: “We have faith in education as the foundation of democratic government. . . . Our schools need the appreciation and cooperation of all those who depend upon them for the education of our youth—the state’s most valuable asset. Our schools are today enabling America to achieve great results, and they can help her to even greater accomplishments.” WOODROW WILSON: “Popular education is necessary for the preservation of those conditions of freedom, political and social, which are indispensable to free individual development. And . . . no instrumentality less universal in its power and authority than govern— ment can secure popular education. . . . Without popular educa- tion, moreover, no government which rests upon popular action can long endure. The people must be schooled in the knowledge, and if possible, in the virtues, upon which themaintenance and success of a free institutions depend.” 1 HERBERT HOOVER: “To maintain the moral and spiritual fibre 5 of our people, to sustain the skill required to use the tools which great discoveries in science have given us, to hold our national ideals, we must not fail in the support and constant improvement of our school system. From generation to generation, we hand on our vast material 1- equipment, our knowledge of how to run it, and our stock of intellec- g tual and spiritual ideas. If we were to suppress our educational system y_ for a single generation, the equipment would decay, the most of our e_ people would dic of starvation, and intellectually and spiritually, we should slip back four thousand years in human progress. We could 3r recover the loss of any big business in a few years—but not this one. And unless our educational system keeps pace with the growth of our or material equipment, we will slip also.” 13 l, :" .—_. SUPERINTENDENT CALLS CONFERENCES TO DISCUSS EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS Recognizing the crisis that confronts public education in Ken- tucky, the Superintendent of Public Instruction has instituted a series of group conferences for the discussion of educational problems. School administrators, principals and members of boards of educa- tion of city, county and graded school districts have been invited to attend. The first of the conferences was held at Elizabethtown on March 13. More than 200 superintendents, principals and board members from sixteen counties in the vicinity of Elizabethtown responded to the call and participated actively in the conference. At the invitation of President H. L. Donovan, a large group met for a similar confer- ence at Eastern Teachers College, Richmond, 011 March 23—24. On March 27 more than 250 superintendents and board members met at Murray, and a like number attended the conference held at Bowling Green on March 28. These group conferences of school leaders have been called for the purpose of discussing ways and means to operate and maintain the public schools during the school year beginning July 1, 1933. In addressing the meetings, Superintendent Richmond has focused attention on the financial crisis facing education, and has called for the full cooperation of all school forces to guard the educational wel- fare of Kentucky’s 700,000 children. Superintendents, principals and board members in attendance have been invited to participate freely in the discussion of their duties and responsibilities as they are re- lated to the problems facing education. The most recent of these conferences was held at Morehead on April 15, with a large and enthusiastic group of educators in attend- ance. On subsequent dates similar meetings will be held in other sec- tions of the state. A splendid spirit of cooperation has been in evi- dence at each conference, and every feature of the programs gives assurance of a closer relationship between public school adminis- - trators, their boards of education, and the State Department of Edu- cation. c‘f‘t‘f‘H REPORT ON THE PROGRESS OF THE KENTUCKY EDUCATIONAL COMMISSION JAMES W. CAMMACK, JR. Secretary, Kentucky Educational Commission .Five important committee reports were submitted to the Ken- tucky Educational Commission at a meeting held April 8 and 9 at the University of Kentucky, Lexington. James H. Richmond, Superin- tendent of Public Instruction and Chairman of the Commission, pre- sided at the meeting. Two reports were adopted, subject to final modi- fication. They were the report of the Subcommittee 011 Curriculum, of which A. C. Burton, Professor of Education at Western State Teachers College, is chairman, and the report of the Subcommittee on Employed Personnel, of which D. Y. Dunn, Superintendent of Fay- ette County Schools, is chairman. The final report of the Subcommittee on School Costs was pre- sented by H. H. Hill, Superintendent of Lexington City Schools and chairman of that committee and adopted subject to final modification. J. W. Martin, Director of Bureau of Business Research at the Univer— sity of Kentucky, presented the report of the Subcommittee on Finan- cial Support. Members of the Commission present at the meeting were Mrs. James G. Sheehan, President of the Kentucky Congress for Parents and Teachers, Danville; Yancey Altsheler, Louisville; J. W. Bradner, Superintendent of Middlesboro City Schools; President H. H. Cherry, Western Kentucky State Teachers College, Bowling Green; Presi— dent Frank L. McVey, University of Kentucky; H. W. Peters, Super- intendent of Christian County Schools; W. J. Webb, Mayfield; and Ben Williamson, Ashland. Members of the Coordinating Committee who were present included President H. L. Donovan, Eastern Ken- tucky State Teachers College, Richmond; Leo M. Chamberlain, Uni— versity of Kentucky; H. H. Hill; and R. E. Jaggers, Director of Teacher Training, State Department of Education. In addition to the chairman of subcommittees who were present to submit their re- ports, a number of civic and educational leaders attended the meet- ing. These included Honorable Fanniebelle Sutherland, of Paris, Director of Kentucky Federation of \Nomen’s Clubs; President Charles J. Turck, of Centre College; President H. E. Watters, of Georgetown College; President John Owen Gross, of Union College; Harper Gatton, President of the Kentucky Education Association; R. E. Williams, Secretary of the Kentucky Education Association; L. C. Caldwell, Superintendent Boyd County Schools, and President R. A. Kent, of the University of Louisville. Members of the Com- mission expressed themselves as being gratified with the rapid pro- gross which has been made, and only a few reports remain to be submitted. .4 r‘ TYPICAL DISPARITIES IN FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOIS D 7‘ $70 KEY $70 - Read Wolfe County School District 1351‘: 1.5mm Per Capita ------------------ $9.00 (Lines "A" to "8") ‘. 2.District Per Capita————- __________ ii_17, 50 - (Lines "B" to I'D") 6o 3.Per Census Pupil Instruction Cost-10.91;,— (Lines "A" to "0") 50 ' 50 C — T 1‘0 -— — ho a) an . I H u . u . :1 a) H :5 . in , o H .4 .o o .u , a H > u x . u: «:5 . m 30 11 55' '° 3 '2 2 ‘ '2? 0 30 in H 1-1 .0 . o .H h , Ir! H >. o n E' .r: o c . > H a .s: a u) . u: m 0 . .4 o E in 4‘ [N -E Do 31 . F! k 20 ' * 20 _. T . D 10 :l 10 G 3 B A o e __0 >A City Districts Graded Districts County Districts The educational opportunities, especially the quality of instruction, offered to the children of any school district depend directly upon financial support. This Chart pictures strikingly the amazing inequalities which may exist even where school districts levy the same tax rate and receive the same state per capita sup- port. This Chart shows the aggregate revenue, the district revenue, and the instructional cost per census pupil in each of three city school districts, three graded school districts, three county school districts, school year 1931-32. The gross disparities in support are not due to differences in local tax rates, for the board of education of each of these districts levied the same rate—759; nor do thev arise from state-wide taxation, for each district received $9.00 or each census pupil from the state school fund. The amazing inequalities are t..; result of the yideodtifferences