minutes of the University denate e February 10, 1941

the Registrar would send Senate a summary of such

 

rules and uolicies before

   

aaééLA/mj

Lecretary

LY SENATE

- m
March 10, 114

L 4
:3,
I

The University Senate met in the Assembly Room of Lafferty Hall
March 10, 1941. Fresident Cooner nresided.

The minutes of February 10 were read and annroved.
On recommendation of the University Council, the Senate ape
tion for an organization to be known as the Students” Art C
«L ‘r
' r

petition had been submitted in accordance with the Senate

and carried the signatures of 69 eligible students.

In the absence of a formal report for the month, Chairmen R. H, Weaver
informed the Senate that the Curriculum Committee had given considera~
tion to the request for apprOVal of Hygiene 51a and 51b. He stated that
the Committee had voted not to annrove Hygiene 51a, but that on request
of the College and the Department, additional time had been granted for
submitting more information on this course. He added that action on this
course would be reported at a later meeting of the Senate.

Chairman R. H. Weaver made the following report on the work of the Curric—
ulum Committee since its establishment:

“The Curriculum Committee was established at the March, 1938, meet”
ing of the University Senate. The committee consists f the chairman,
elected by the Senate, and nine other members, aptointed by the chairman,
subject to the apDIOVal of the President of the University. There are
five members from the College of Arts and Sciences, including one from
the social sciences, including nsychology, one from the physical sciences,
and one from literature, philosophy and the arts, and one from each of
the other colleges.

The function of the committee, to quote the resolution which estabw
lished it, is 'to examine existing courses and to make recommendations
to the Senate as to the need for and desirability of these courses; to
recommend to the Senate the action to be taken by that body to eliminate
duplication of courses between denartments and between colleges; and to
examine all pronosed new courses or changes in courses and to recommend
to the Senate the action to be taken to prevent future duplication of
courses and unwise expansion of the curriculum.‘